Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Medical Oncology, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 Jul 7;77(14):1118-1127. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxaa135.
The primary objective of the study described here was to compare rates of patient adherence to anticancer medications filled at an internal health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) vs external specialty pharmacies. The primary outcome was the medication possession ratio (MPR), and the secondary outcomes included proportion of days covered (PDC), and time to treatment (TTT).
A retrospective chart review was conducted to compare the MPR, PDC, and TTT for patients who received oral anticancer therapy using prescriptions claim data. A t test or Wilcoxon test was used to explore the effect of demographic and other factors on adherence and TTT. A multiple regression model with backward elimination was used to analyze significant factors to identify covariates significantly associated with the outcomes.
Of the 300 patients screened for study inclusion, 204 patients whose records had complete MPR and PDC data and 164 whose records had TTT data were included in the analysis. There were significant between-group differences in mean MPR and mean PDC with patient use of the HSSP vs external pharmacies (1.00 vs 0.75 [P < 0.001] and 0.95 vs 0.7 [P < 0.001], respectively). Pharmacy type (P = 0.024) and tumor type (P = 0.048) were significantly associated with TTT.
The multiple regression analysis indicated that oncology patients who filled their anticancer medication precriptions at an internal HSSP at an academic medical center had significantly higher adherence, as measured by MPR and PDC, and quicker TTT than those who filled their prescriptions at an external specialty pharmacy.
本研究旨在比较在内部医疗系统专科药房(HSSP)和外部专科药房配药的癌症患者的药物依从率。主要结局是药物使用剂量(MPR),次要结局包括用药天数覆盖比例(PDC)和治疗时间(TTT)。
采用回顾性病历审查比较使用处方索赔数据接受口服抗癌治疗的患者的 MPR、PDC 和 TTT。采用 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 检验探讨人口统计学和其他因素对依从性和 TTT 的影响。采用向后消除的多元回归模型分析显著因素,以确定与结局显著相关的协变量。
在筛选的 300 名符合研究纳入标准的患者中,204 名患者的 MPR 和 PDC 记录完整,164 名患者的 TTT 记录完整,纳入分析。与使用外部药房相比,使用 HSSP 的患者 MPR 和 PDC 平均值存在显著差异(1.00 对 0.75 [P < 0.001] 和 0.95 对 0.7 [P < 0.001])。药房类型(P = 0.024)和肿瘤类型(P = 0.048)与 TTT 显著相关。
多元回归分析表明,在学术医疗中心内部 HSSP 配药的癌症患者,其药物依从性(通过 MPR 和 PDC 测量)更高,TTT 更快,而在外部专科药房配药的患者则较低。