Department of Pharmacy, Methodist Health System, 1441 N Beckley Ave, Dallas, TX 75203. Email:
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Dec 1;26(12):e380-e387. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88544.
To assess adherence to specialty medications for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at an integrated health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) and identify characteristics associated with adherence.
Single-center, retrospective cohort study.
Study patients were adults with RA who filled at least 3 prescriptions for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) between July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, at an integrated HSSP. Data were collected from pharmacy claims and electronic health records. The primary outcome, adherence, was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC). Proportional odds logistic regression was used to test association between PDC and age, gender, race, insurance type, and out-of-pocket costs.
We included 675 patients: 77% were female, 90% were White, 29% were naive to treatment at initial dispensing, 60% held commercial insurance, and the median age was 56 years. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient out-of-pocket cost per fill was $1.50 ($0-$5). Median (IQR) PDC was 0.95 (0.84-1.00); 80% of patients achieved PDC of 0.80 or higher. Higher adherence was more likely in patients who were male (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% CI, 1.15-2.18; P = .005], naive to specialty medication treatment (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 2.21-4.18; P < .001), and older in age (per 10 years: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.32; P = .008), and adherence had a significant nonlinear association with average cost per fill (P = .006); associations with race and insurance type were not significant.
At an integrated HSSP, patients with RA paid low out-of-pocket costs for bDMARD therapy and achieved high treatment adherence. Data suggest that integrated HSSPs assist patients in removing financial barriers to treatment.
评估综合医疗系统专科药房(HSSP)中类风湿关节炎(RA)专科药物的依从性,并确定与依从性相关的特征。
单中心、回顾性队列研究。
研究对象为 2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间在综合 HSSP 至少开具 3 种生物疾病修饰抗风湿药物(bDMARD)处方的 RA 成年患者。数据来自药房理赔和电子健康记录。主要结局为依从性,通过比例天数覆盖(PDC)来衡量。使用比例优势逻辑回归检验 PDC 与年龄、性别、种族、保险类型和自付费用之间的关联。
我们纳入了 675 名患者:77%为女性,90%为白人,29%在初始配药时对治疗无经验,60%持有商业保险,中位年龄为 56 岁。每名患者每次配药的中位(四分位距[IQR])自付费用为 1.50 美元(0-5 美元)。中位(IQR)PDC 为 0.95(0.84-1.00);80%的患者达到 PDC 0.80 或更高。男性(比值比[OR],1.58;95%可信区间[CI],1.15-2.18;P=0.005)、对专科药物治疗无经验(OR,3.04;95%CI,2.21-4.18;P<0.001)和年龄较大(每 10 岁:OR,1.17;95%CI,1.04-1.32;P=0.008)的患者依从性更高,且与平均每次配药费用呈显著非线性关系(P=0.006);种族和保险类型与依从性之间无显著关联。
在综合 HSSP 中,RA 患者的 bDMARD 治疗自付费用较低,治疗依从性较高。数据表明,综合 HSSP 有助于患者消除治疗的经济障碍。