Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Butte, CO 81224.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):15112-15122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919377117. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
Many animals have the potential to discriminate nonspectral colors. For humans, purple is the clearest example of a nonspectral color. It is perceived when two color cone types in the retina (blue and red) with nonadjacent spectral sensitivity curves are predominantly stimulated. Purple is considered nonspectral because no monochromatic light (such as from a rainbow) can evoke this simultaneous stimulation. Except in primates and bees, few behavioral experiments have directly examined nonspectral color discrimination, and little is known about nonspectral color perception in animals with more than three types of color photoreceptors. Birds have four color cone types (compared to three in humans) and might perceive additional nonspectral colors such as UV+red and UV+green. Can birds discriminate nonspectral colors, and are these colors behaviorally and ecologically relevant? Here, using comprehensive behavioral experiments, we show that wild hummingbirds can discriminate a variety of nonspectral colors. We also show that hummingbirds, relative to humans, likely perceive a greater proportion of natural colors as nonspectral. Our analysis of plumage and plant spectra reveals many colors that would be perceived as nonspectral by birds but not by humans: Birds' extra cone type allows them not just to see UV light but also to discriminate additional nonspectral colors. Our results support the idea that birds can distinguish colors throughout tetrachromatic color space and indicate that nonspectral color perception is vital for signaling and foraging. Since tetrachromacy appears to have evolved early in vertebrates, this capacity for rich nonspectral color perception is likely widespread.
许多动物都具有辨别非光谱色的能力。对于人类来说,紫色是非光谱色最明显的例子。当视网膜中的两种色锥细胞(蓝色和红色)受到非相邻光谱灵敏度曲线的强烈刺激时,就会感知到紫色。紫色被认为是非光谱色,因为没有单色光(如来自彩虹的光)可以引起这种同时刺激。除了灵长类动物和蜜蜂外,很少有行为实验直接研究非光谱色的辨别能力,对于具有三种以上类型的色光感受器的动物的非光谱色感知知之甚少。鸟类有四种色锥细胞(而人类只有三种),可能会感知到额外的非光谱色,如 UV+红色和 UV+绿色。鸟类能否辨别非光谱色,这些颜色在行为和生态上是否相关?在这里,我们通过全面的行为实验表明,野生蜂鸟可以辨别各种非光谱色。我们还表明,与人类相比,蜂鸟可能会将更大比例的自然色感知为非光谱色。我们对羽毛和植物光谱的分析揭示了许多对鸟类可见但对人类不可见的颜色:鸟类额外的色锥细胞不仅使它们能够看到紫外线,还能够辨别额外的非光谱色。我们的结果支持鸟类可以在四色光谱空间中区分颜色的观点,并表明非光谱色感知对信号传递和觅食至关重要。由于四色觉似乎在脊椎动物早期就已经进化,因此这种丰富的非光谱色感知能力可能很普遍。