Suppr超能文献

坎地沙坦预防偏头痛:一项回顾性真实世界研究的结果。

Candesartan in migraine prevention: results from a retrospective real-world study.

机构信息

Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.

Neurology Unit, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2020 Nov;267(11):3243-3247. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09989-9. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Abstract

Randomized studies have reported a positive effect of candesartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in migraine prevention. The aim of our study was to explore patient subjective efficacy of candesartan in a real-world sample of migraine patients and try to identify predictors of candesartan response. We audited the clinical records of 253 patients who attended the King's College Hospital, London, from February 2015 to December 2017, looking specifically at their response to candesartan. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of headache benefit. Odds ratios (OR) with confidence intervals (CI) 95% were calculated. Eighty-one patients (chronic migraine, n = 68) were included in the final analysis. Thirty-eight patients reported a positive response to candesartan, while 43 patients did not have a meaningful therapeutic effect. The median dose of candesartan was 8 mg and the median treatment period was 6 months. In a univariate logistic regression model, the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.96, p = 0.04). In multivariate logistic regression model, younger age (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.98, p = 0.006) and longer disease duration (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03) were associated with a good response to candesartan, while the presence of daily headache was associated with reduced odds of headache benefit (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.71, p = 0.01). Having failed up to nine preventives in patients did not predict a treatment failure with candesartan as well. Candesartan yields clinical benefits in difficult-to-treat migraine patients, irrespective of previous failed preventives.

摘要

随机研究报告称,血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂坎地沙坦对偏头痛预防有积极作用。我们的研究目的是在偏头痛患者的真实样本中探索坎地沙坦的患者主观疗效,并尝试确定坎地沙坦反应的预测因素。我们审核了 2015 年 2 月至 2017 年 12 月在伦敦国王学院医院就诊的 253 名患者的临床记录,专门观察他们对坎地沙坦的反应。我们使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来确定头痛获益的预测因素。计算了优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。81 名患者(慢性偏头痛,n=68)纳入最终分析。38 名患者报告坎地沙坦有积极反应,而 43 名患者没有明显的治疗效果。坎地沙坦的中位剂量为 8 毫克,中位治疗期为 6 个月。在单变量逻辑回归模型中,每日头痛的存在与头痛获益的可能性降低相关(OR 0.39,95%CI 0.16-0.96,p=0.04)。在多变量逻辑回归模型中,年龄较小(OR 0.92,95%CI 0.87-0.98,p=0.006)和较长的疾病病程(OR 1.06,95%CI 1.01-1.12,p=0.03)与对坎地沙坦的良好反应相关,而每日头痛的存在与头痛获益的可能性降低相关(OR 0.16,95%CI 0.04-0.71,p=0.01)。在患者中失败了多达九种预防药物也不能预测坎地沙坦治疗的失败。坎地沙坦对治疗困难的偏头痛患者有临床获益,与以前失败的预防药物无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验