• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diabetic patient assessment of chronic illness care using PACIC.使用 PACIC 评估糖尿病患者的慢性病护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5.
2
Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management.慢性病照护患者评估(PACIC)在糖尿病患者中的应用:与患者特征、照护接受情况及自我管理的关系
Diabetes Care. 2005 Nov;28(11):2655-61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2655.
3
Evaluation of Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Multimorbid Patients Using PACIC+ Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study.采用 PACIC+问卷评估多病共存患者对医疗保健服务的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):276. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020276.
4
Reliability and validity of the Greek translation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care + (PACIC-PLUS GR) survey.希腊语翻译的患者评估慢性病护理+(PACIC-PLUS-GR)调查的可靠性和有效性。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01192-z.
5
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
6
Diabetes care: Comparison of patients' and healthcare professionals' assessment using the PACIC instrument.糖尿病护理:使用患者激活护理指数(PACIC)工具对患者与医疗保健专业人员评估的比较
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):803-811. doi: 10.1111/jep.12720. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Patients' assessment of chronic illness care: a validation study among patients with type 2 diabetes in Finland.患者对慢性病护理的评估:芬兰2型糖尿病患者的一项验证性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 5;18(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3206-7.
8
Alignment of patient and primary care practice member perspectives of chronic illness care: a cross-sectional analysis.患者和初级保健实践成员对慢性病护理的观点的一致性:一项横断面分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 29;15:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-57.
9
Transcultural adaptation and validation of Persian Version of Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC-5As) Questionnaire in Iranian older patients with type 2 diabetes.跨文化调适与验证伊朗 2 型糖尿病老年患者使用慢性疾病关怀患者评估问卷(PACIC-5As)波斯语版
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11557-0.
10
Implementing elements of a context-adapted chronic care model to improve first-line diabetes care: effects on assessment of chronic illness care and glycaemic control among people with diabetes enrolled to the First-Line Diabetes Care (FiLDCare) Project in the Northern Philippines.实施适应情境的慢性病护理模式要素以改善一线糖尿病护理:对菲律宾北部一线糖尿病护理(FiLDCare)项目中登记的糖尿病患者慢性病护理评估和血糖控制的影响。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Sep;16(5):481-91. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000553. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding patients' perceptions of chronic illness care, self-management support needs and their relationship with telehealth preferences: a cross-sectional study in Vietnamese primary care.了解患者对慢性病护理的认知、自我管理支持需求及其与远程医疗偏好的关系:越南初级保健领域的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 24;15(6):e090734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090734.
2
Effects of a health education intervention based on the behavior change wheel on fear of hypoglycemia behavior in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a randomized controlled pilot trial.基于行为改变轮的健康教育干预对2型糖尿病患者低血糖恐惧行为的影响:一项随机对照试验
Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00592-025-02549-5.
3
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Its Influence on Patient Compliance With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者评估慢性疾病护理 (PACIC) 及其对高血压患者依从性的影响:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277445. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277445.
4
Evaluation of Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Multimorbid Patients Using PACIC+ Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study.采用 PACIC+问卷评估多病共存患者对医疗保健服务的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):276. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020276.
5
Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and its associations with quality of life among Swiss patients with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study.患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其与瑞士系统性硬化症患者生活质量的关系:一项混合方法研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jan 9;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02604-2.
6
Using a brief web-based 5A intervention to improve weight management in primary care: results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.采用基于网络的简短 5A 干预措施改善初级保健中的体重管理:一项群组随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01404-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9 edition.2019 年全球及各区域糖尿病患病率估算值及 2030 年和 2045 年预测值:国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集(第 9 版)的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
The prevalence and treatment patterns of diabetes in the Greek population based on real-world data from the nation-wide prescription database.基于全国处方数据库的真实世界数据,希腊人群中糖尿病的患病率及治疗模式。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016 Aug;118:162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
3
Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO-DAS II) in Greek and its added value to the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in a sample of people with or without disabilities.世界卫生组织残疾评定量表(WHO-DAS II)在希腊语中的效度及其在残疾和非残疾人群样本中相对于简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)的附加价值。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Jul;9(3):518-23. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
4
Congruency of diabetes care with the Chronic Care Model in different Swiss health care organisations from the patients' perspective: a cross sectional study.从患者角度看瑞士不同医疗保健机构中糖尿病护理与慢性病护理模式的一致性:一项横断面研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Sep 10;144:w13992. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.13992. eCollection 2014.
5
Diabetes and depression.糖尿病与抑郁症。
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Jun;14(6):491. doi: 10.1007/s11892-014-0491-3.
6
Measuring chronic care management experience of patients with diabetes: PACIC and PACIC+ validation.测量糖尿病患者的慢性病管理体验:PACIC 和 PACIC+ 的验证。
Int J Integr Care. 2012 Oct 1;12:e194. doi: 10.5334/ijic.862. Print 2012 Oct.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of diabetes and risk of physical disability and functional impairment - protocol.糖尿病与身体残疾和功能障碍风险的系统评价和荟萃分析 - 方案。
Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;1:47. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-47.
8
Psychometric properties of the Patient Assessment Of Chronic Illness Care measure: acceptability, reliability and validity in United Kingdom patients with long-term conditions.患者评估慢性疾病护理量表的心理测量特性:英国长期疾病患者的可接受性、信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 31;12:293. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-293.
9
The chronic care model: congruency and predictors among patients with cardiovascular diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Netherlands.慢性病护理模式:荷兰心血管疾病和慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的一致性和预测因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 7;12:242. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-242.
10
Disease management projects and the Chronic Care Model in action: baseline qualitative research.疾病管理项目和慢性病照护模式的实践:基线定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 11;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-114.

使用 PACIC 评估糖尿病患者的慢性病护理。

Diabetic patient assessment of chronic illness care using PACIC.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Perifreiakh Odos Larisas, Trikalon, TK 41110, Larisa, Greece.

General Public Hospital of Volos "Achillopouleio", Athanasaki 3, TK 38222, Volos, Greece.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05400-5
PMID:32546232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7296774/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care plus is used in order to assess whether provided care is congruent with the Chronic Care Model, according to patients. The purpose of this study was to correlate PACIC+ and the revised 5As "ask, advise, agree, assist and arrange" scoring of a sample of DM patients, with their QoL, depressive symptomatology, demographic and disease characteristics, self-management behaviours of healthy eating and physical activity.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study where data were collected between January and April 2018 by using three questionnaires (PACIC+, SF-36, CES-D) from a sample of 90 DM patients treated at a Public General Hospital of Central Greece. Anonymous self-completed questionnaires were used to collect the data. Data was processed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants with DM was 52.8 years (SD = 21.2 years), with cardiovascular disease and arterial hypertension scoring as the most frequently reporting chronic comorbidities. The healthcare received by DM patients has been correlated with their QoL. More specifically SF - 36 and PACIC+ scale scores showed a positive and low correlation in several subscales. The total score of PACIC+ scale as well as the Patient activation score were increased in higher scores of vitality (p = 0.034 & p = 0.028 respectively), hence both scores correlate significantly with latter. In addition, Delivery System / Practice Design score was increased in higher scores of mental health (p = 0.01) and MCS (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The shift from hospital care focusing on the disease to a more patient-oriented approach puts forward a dynamic holistic approach to chronic diseases and the reduction of their impact. Finding evidence-based and effective strategies to promote health, prevent and manage chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus is deemed to be crucial and necessary. PACIC+, which is a tool of a patient-level assessment of CCM implementation, can be used by countries which intend to apply changes in the way their health systems provide chronic care and specifically wish to improve the quality of chronic disease care and the QoL of their patients.

摘要

背景

根据患者的评估,慢性疾病关怀加是用来评估所提供的护理是否符合慢性护理模式。本研究的目的是将 PACIC+与修订后的 5A“询问、建议、同意、协助和安排”评分与 DM 患者样本的生活质量、抑郁症状、人口统计学和疾病特征、健康饮食和身体活动的自我管理行为进行相关分析。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,于 2018 年 1 月至 4 月期间,从希腊中部一家公立综合医院接受治疗的 90 名 DM 患者中使用三个问卷(PACIC+、SF-36、CES-D)收集数据。匿名自填问卷用于收集数据。数据在社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)中进行处理。

结果

DM 患者的平均年龄为 52.8 岁(标准差=21.2 岁),心血管疾病和动脉高血压是最常见的慢性合并症。DM 患者接受的医疗保健与他们的生活质量相关。更具体地说,SF-36 和 PACIC+量表评分在几个子量表中呈正相关且相关性较低。PACIC+量表的总分以及患者激活评分在活力得分较高时增加(p=0.034 和 p=0.028 分别),因此两者与后者呈显著相关。此外,在心理健康(p=0.01)和 MCS(p=0.03)得分较高时,交付系统/实践设计评分增加。

结论

从以疾病为中心的医院护理向更以患者为中心的方法转变,提出了一种针对慢性疾病及其影响的动态整体方法。寻找基于证据的有效策略来促进健康,预防和管理糖尿病等慢性疾病被认为是至关重要和必要的。PACIC+是评估 CCM 实施情况的患者水平评估工具,希望改善慢性病护理质量和患者生活质量的国家可以使用它来改变其卫生系统提供慢性病护理的方式。