• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者评估慢性疾病护理 (PACIC) 及其对高血压患者依从性的影响:一项横断面研究。

Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Its Influence on Patient Compliance With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277445. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277445.

DOI:10.1177/00469580241277445
PMID:39245935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11382249/
Abstract

The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a framework that supports the proactive, planned, coordinated and patient-centered care of chronic diseases. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) scale is a valuable tool for evaluating patients' perspectives on chronic care delivery based on the CCM. Few studies have examined its application in China. This study assesses hypertension care in Chinese patients and explores how PACIC scores relate to patient compliance. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Hangzhou, China, from June to August 2021, including 253 hypertensive patients from 5 county hospitals and 13 primary healthcare centers. The study used the PACIC scale to assess hypertension care delivery and the Compliance of Hypertensive Patients scale (CHPS) to measure patient compliance. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between demographic characteristics and the total and domain scores of PACIC, as well as the association between CHPS and the domain scores of PACIC. The mean value of overall the PACIC score was 3.12 (out of 5). Problem solving/contextual domain had the highest average score for each item, while follow up/coordination domain had the lowest. Patient activation had negative effects on intention (β = -.18,  < .05), attitude (β = -.21,  < .05), responsibility (β = -.17,  < .05), and the total score of CHPS (β = -.24,  < .01). Delivery system design/decision support was negatively associated with lifestyle (β = -.21,  < .05) and the total score of CHPS (β = -.26,  < .01). Hypertensive patients perceived that they sometimes received hypertension care consistent with the CCM in Chinese primary healthcare settings. A higher level of PACIC score was beneficial for improving hypertensive patient compliance.

摘要

慢性病管理模式(CCM)是一种支持主动、计划、协调和以患者为中心的慢性病管理的框架。慢性病患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)量表是一种评估患者基于 CCM 的慢性病照护体验的有价值工具。很少有研究在中国进行过应用研究。本研究评估了中国高血压患者的照护情况,并探讨了 PACIC 评分与患者依从性的关系。本研究采用横断面研究方法,于 2021 年 6 月至 8 月在杭州市 5 家县级医院和 13 家基层医疗卫生中心纳入 253 例高血压患者。研究使用 PACIC 量表评估高血压照护的提供情况,使用高血压患者依从性量表(CHPS)评估患者的依从性。采用多元线性回归分析方法,探讨人口统计学特征与 PACIC 总分和各维度得分之间的关系,以及 CHPS 与 PACIC 各维度得分之间的关系。PACIC 总分的平均值为 3.12(满分 5 分)。每个项目中,解决问题/情境维度的平均分最高,而后续/协调维度的平均分最低。患者激活对意图(β=-0.18,<0.05)、态度(β=-0.21,<0.05)、责任(β=-0.17,<0.05)和 CHPS 总分(β=-0.24,<0.01)有负面影响。交付系统设计/决策支持与生活方式(β=-0.21,<0.05)和 CHPS 总分(β=-0.26,<0.01)呈负相关。高血压患者认为,他们在基层医疗卫生机构有时会接受符合 CCM 的高血压照护。较高的 PACIC 评分有助于提高高血压患者的依从性。

相似文献

1
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and Its Influence on Patient Compliance With Hypertension: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者评估慢性疾病护理 (PACIC) 及其对高血压患者依从性的影响:一项横断面研究。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241277445. doi: 10.1177/00469580241277445.
2
Validity and reliability of the patient assessment on chronic illness care (PACIC) questionnaire: the Malay version.慢性病照护患者评估问卷(PACIC)的效度与信度:马来语版本
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0807-5.
3
Alignment of patient and primary care practice member perspectives of chronic illness care: a cross-sectional analysis.患者和初级保健实践成员对慢性病护理的观点的一致性:一项横断面分析。
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Mar 29;15:57. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-57.
4
Seen through the patients' eyes: quality of chronic illness care.从患者视角看:慢性病护理质量
Fam Pract. 2018 Jul 23;35(4):446-451. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmx123.
5
Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study.新加坡初级保健网络中糖尿病护理的患者视角:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):1445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10310-3.
6
Assessment of Compliance Status and Its Determinants Among Hypertensive Patients From County Areas in Zhejiang, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国浙江县域高血压患者依从性状况及其影响因素评估:一项横断面研究
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;42(1):104-112. doi: 10.1111/phn.13466. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
7
Patients' experience of chronic illness care in a network of teaching settings.患者在教学网络环境下对慢性病护理的体验。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Dec;58(12):1366-73.
8
Assessment of hypertension chronic care model: Pacic application in Bosnia and Herzegovina.高血压慢性病护理模式评估:在波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的太平洋应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0202250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202250. eCollection 2018.
9
Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and its associations with quality of life among Swiss patients with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study.患者评估慢性病照护(PACIC)及其与瑞士系统性硬化症患者生活质量的关系:一项混合方法研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jan 9;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02604-2.
10
The Chronic Care Model: congruency and predictors among primary care patients with osteoarthritis.慢性病照护模式:骨关节炎初级护理患者中的一致性及预测因素
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):442-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022822.

引用本文的文献

1
"Patient-Centered" Self-Efficacy and Chronic Disease Management: Associations with Doctors' Intentions and Perceived Treatment Effectiveness.“以患者为中心”的自我效能与慢性病管理:与医生意图及感知治疗效果的关联
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251368004. doi: 10.1177/00469580251368004. Epub 2025 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The WHO Global report 2023 on hypertension warning the emerging hypertension burden in globe and its treatment strategy.世界卫生组织 2023 年全球高血压报告警告全球新兴的高血压负担及其治疗策略。
Hypertens Res. 2024 May;47(5):1099-1102. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01622-w. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
2
Patient perspectives of diabetes care in primary care networks in Singapore: a mixed-methods study.新加坡初级保健网络中糖尿病护理的患者视角:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):1445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10310-3.
3
The relationship between hypertensive patients' satisfaction with hypertension care and their antihypertensive medication adherence.高血压患者对高血压护理的满意度与他们的降压药物依从性之间的关系。
J Vasc Nurs. 2023 Sep;41(3):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 25.
4
Implementation Strategies to Improve Blood Pressure Control in the United States: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American Medical Association.提高美国血压控制水平的实施策略:美国心脏协会和美国医学协会的科学声明。
Hypertension. 2023 Oct;80(10):e143-e157. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000232. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
5
2023 ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension: Endorsed by the International Society of Hypertension (ISH) and the European Renal Association (ERA).2023ESH 动脉高血压管理指南 欧洲高血压学会动脉高血压管理工作组:得到国际高血压学会 (ISH) 和欧洲肾脏协会 (ERA) 的认可。
J Hypertens. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1874-2071. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003480. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
The association between Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Scores and quality of life in type 2 diabetes patients.2型糖尿病患者慢性病照护的患者评估得分与生活质量之间的关联。
J Res Nurs. 2023 May;28(3):199-211. doi: 10.1177/17449871221144899. Epub 2023 Apr 30.
7
Depressive primary care patients' assessment of received collaborative care.抑郁性初级保健患者对接受的协作式护理的评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29339-9.
8
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China, 2004-18: findings from six rounds of a national survey.2004-2018 年中国高血压的流行、知晓、治疗和控制情况:来自六轮全国调查的结果。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 11;380:e071952. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071952.
9
Patients' Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC): Validation and Evaluation of PACIC Scale among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Hungary.患者对慢性病护理的评估(PACIC):匈牙利2型糖尿病患者中PACIC量表的验证与评估
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Aug 8;22(3):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6010. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
10
Psychometric Properties and Effects on Health Outcomes of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) in Korean Hemodialysis Patients.韩国血液透析患者慢性病护理患者评估量表(PACIC)的心理测量特性及其对健康结局的影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;10(6):1149. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061149.