• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚乙二醇与匹可硫酸钠在结肠镜检查患者肠道清洁效果及患者耐受性方面的比较

Effectiveness in Bowel Cleansing and Patient Tolerability of Polyethylene Glycol versus Sodium Picosulphate in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.

作者信息

Jaiswal Amit Kumar, Chaudhary Shatdal

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Siddhartha Nagar City Hospital, Bhairahawa, Nepal.

Department of Internal Medicine, Universal College of Medical Sciences, Bhairahawa, Nepal.

出版信息

Adv Med. 2020 May 30;2020:1234341. doi: 10.1155/2020/1234341. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/1234341
PMID:32551324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7277063/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Colonoscopy is considered as a gold standard investigation for screening of colorectal cancer and other lower gastrointestinal pathologies. Adequate bowel preparation is absolutely necessary for a fruitful colonoscopy. Various bowel cleansing agents are being used for his purpose. The aim of the present study was to compare the two bowel cleansing agents: a single dose of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) solution and a split dose of Sodium Picosulfate (Na PICOSUL) tablet with regards to cleansing efficacy and tolerability among the patients scheduled for colonoscopy.

METHODS

It is an open-label hospital-based observational study. A total of sixty-four patients were grouped randomly into two groups of bowel cleansing agents that are PEG and Na PICOSUL during the study period between 1 December 2015 and 30 November 2016. Patients' tolerability was evaluated using a structured questionnaire, and the bowel cleansing efficacy was evaluated using the Aronchick Bowel Preparation Scale (ABPS).

RESULTS

The group that received PEG solution was found to have better efficacy than that which received Na PICOSUL tablet (63.3% versus 29.4%, respectively, with a value < 0.028) with excellent grade as per ABPS. The Na PICOSUL group was found better in terms of tolerability than the PEG group as nausea/vomiting was encountered significantly higher in the PEG group than in the Na PICOSUL group (43.3% versus 11.8%, respectively, with a value < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic preparation with a split dose of Na PICOSUL tablet was better tolerated than the evening before regimen of PEG solution. However, PEG solution was found to be more efficacious in bowel cleansing, but procedural performance and lesion detection were similar for both agents.

摘要

引言

结肠镜检查被认为是筛查结直肠癌和其他下消化道疾病的金标准检查方法。充分的肠道准备对于成功的结肠镜检查绝对必要。为此使用了各种肠道清洁剂。本研究的目的是比较两种肠道清洁剂:单剂量聚乙二醇(PEG)溶液和分次剂量的匹可硫酸钠(Na PICOSUL)片剂,比较其在结肠镜检查患者中的清洁效果和耐受性。

方法

这是一项基于医院的开放标签观察性研究。在2015年12月1日至2016年11月30日的研究期间,共有64例患者被随机分为两组肠道清洁剂组,即PEG组和Na PICOSUL组。使用结构化问卷评估患者的耐受性,并使用阿龙奇克肠道准备量表(ABPS)评估肠道清洁效果。

结果

发现接受PEG溶液的组比接受Na PICOSUL片剂的组具有更好的效果(分别为63.3%和29.4%,P值<0.028),根据ABPS为优秀等级。发现Na PICOSUL组在耐受性方面比PEG组更好,因为PEG组中恶心/呕吐的发生率明显高于Na PICOSUL组(分别为43.3%和11.8%,P值<0.01)。

结论

分次剂量的Na PICOSUL片剂进行结肠准备比PEG溶液的前夜方案耐受性更好。然而,发现PEG溶液在肠道清洁方面更有效,但两种制剂的操作表现和病变检测相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abd7/7277063/677c5190c318/AMED2020-1234341.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abd7/7277063/677c5190c318/AMED2020-1234341.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abd7/7277063/677c5190c318/AMED2020-1234341.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness in Bowel Cleansing and Patient Tolerability of Polyethylene Glycol versus Sodium Picosulphate in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.聚乙二醇与匹可硫酸钠在结肠镜检查患者肠道清洁效果及患者耐受性方面的比较
Adv Med. 2020 May 30;2020:1234341. doi: 10.1155/2020/1234341. eCollection 2020.
2
Oral sodium phosphate solution: a review of its use as a colorectal cleanser.口服磷酸钠溶液:用作结肠清洁剂的综述。
Drugs. 2004;64(15):1697-714. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464150-00009.
3
A randomised controlled trial of a new 2 litre polyethylene glycol solution versus sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.一项关于新型2升聚乙二醇溶液与比沙可啶钠+枸橼酸镁溶液在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的随机对照试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Feb;24(2):481-8. doi: 10.1185/030079908x260844.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of 2-L polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid versus sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate: a randomized controlled trial.2-L聚乙二醇与抗坏血酸对比比沙可啶肠溶片与枸橼酸镁的疗效及耐受性:一项随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;33(5):541-548. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2989-7. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
5
Comparison of a split-dose bowel preparation with 2 liters of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and 1 liter of polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid and bisacodyl before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前,对比 2 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 与 1 升聚乙二醇加维生素 C 和比沙可啶的分剂量肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Aug;86(2):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
6
A single or split dose picosulphate/magnesium citrate before colonoscopy: comparison regarding tolerance and efficacy with polyethylene glycol. A randomized trial.结肠镜检查前单次或分次服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:与聚乙二醇在耐受性和疗效方面的比较。一项随机试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.vk1.
7
A randomized controlled trial comparing polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid with sodium picosulphate + magnesium citrate solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.一项比较聚乙二醇+抗坏血酸与匹可硫酸钠+枸橼酸镁溶液用于结肠镜检查前肠道准备的随机对照试验。
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;184(4):819-23. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1182-4. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
8
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Effectiveness of very low-volume preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective, multicenter observational study.结肠镜检查前极低容量准备的效果:一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1950-1961. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1950.
10
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.

引用本文的文献

1
Pre-colonoscopy special guidance and education on intestinal cleaning and examination in older adult patients with constipation.结肠镜检查前针对老年便秘患者肠道清洁及检查的特殊指导与教育
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug 27;14(8):778-787. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.778.
2
The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation.确定理想肠道准备方法的未满足需求。
JGH Open. 2021 Sep 17;5(10):1135-1141. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12653. eCollection 2021 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation.聚乙二醇与匹可硫酸钠/枸橼酸镁用于结肠镜检查前准备的比较
Endosc Int Open. 2014 Dec;2(4):E230-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377520. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
2
Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC) Plus Laxative Is a Good Alternative to Conventional Large Volume Polyethylene Glycol in Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Randomized Single-Blinded Trial.含枸橼酸镁的比沙可啶钠(SPMC)加泻药在肠道准备中是传统大容量聚乙二醇的良好替代方案:一项多中心随机单盲试验
Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):494-501. doi: 10.5009/gnl14010.
3
A single or split dose picosulphate/magnesium citrate before colonoscopy: comparison regarding tolerance and efficacy with polyethylene glycol. A randomized trial.
结肠镜检查前单次或分次服用比沙可啶/枸橼酸镁:与聚乙二醇在耐受性和疗效方面的比较。一项随机试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;23(2):141-6. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.232.vk1.
4
Efficacy and acceptability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate vs low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colon cleansing: a randomized controlled trial.聚乙二醇电解质散/枸橼酸镁钠与低渗聚乙二醇加维生素 C 用于肠道清洁的疗效和可接受性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Sep;15(9):1145-53. doi: 10.1111/codi.12246.
5
Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.影响结肠镜检查肠道准备质量的因素。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb 16;5(2):39-46. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i2.39.
6
Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline.结肠镜检查的肠道准备:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南。
Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):142-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326186. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
7
4-Liter split-dose polyethylene glycol is superior to other bowel preparations, based on systematic review and meta-analysis.4 升分剂量聚乙二醇优于其他肠道准备,基于系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Nov;10(11):1225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.08.029. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
8
Usefulness of colonoscopy in ischemic colitis.结肠镜检查在缺血性结肠炎中的作用。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010 Jul;102(8):478-83. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082010000800004.
9
Multi-institution hospital-based cancer incidence data for Nepal: an initial report.尼泊尔基于多机构医院的癌症发病率数据:初步报告。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Apr-Jun;10(2):259-62.
10
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4 Suppl):S16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.02.021.