Türkoğlu Ahmet, Oğuz Abdullah, Yaman Gizem, Gül Mesut, Ülger Burak Veli
Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):273-277. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4276. eCollection 2019 Dec.
Various techniques are used in the management of splenic hilum during laparoscopic splenectomy. Among them, the most used ones are polymer clips, en-bloc stapling and ultrasonic devices. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature comparing the results of clip and stapler techniques. This study was aimed to compare our results of clip ligation and en-bloc stapling of the splenic hilum.
The records of 67 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy between December 2012 and October 2017 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method (stapler group: 26 patients and clip group: 41 patients). Patient age, sex, diagnosis, surgical technique, operation time, spleen dimensions, perioperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, blood transfusions, postoperative thrombocyte and hemoglobin levels were recorded.
Operating time was median 115 min (75-230) in the stapler group and 120 min (60-210) in the clip group, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p= 0.2593). There were no significant difference between the groups in terms of the postoperative complications (p= 0.59). Postop- erative hospital stay was median 3.5 (2-8) days in the stapler group and 3 (2-6) days in the clip group with no significant difference (p= 0.0733).
Clip ligation and en-bloc stapling techniques have no superiority over each other. Our results also showed that both techniques are safe and feasible. We suggest opting for the method according to the surgeon's experience and hospital facilities.
在腹腔镜脾切除术中,脾门处理采用了多种技术。其中,最常用的是聚合物夹、整块缝合器和超声设备。据我们所知,文献中尚无比较夹子和缝合器技术结果的研究。本研究旨在比较我们采用夹子结扎和整块缝合脾门的结果。
回顾了2012年12月至2017年10月期间67例行腹腔镜脾切除术患者的记录。根据手术方法将患者分为两组(缝合器组:26例患者;夹子组:41例患者)。记录患者的年龄、性别、诊断、手术技术、手术时间、脾脏大小、围手术期并发症、术后住院时间、输血情况、术后血小板和血红蛋白水平。
缝合器组手术时间中位数为115分钟(75 - 230分钟),夹子组为120分钟(60 - 210分钟),两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.2593)。两组术后并发症方面无显著差异(p = 0.59)。缝合器组术后住院时间中位数为3.5天(2 - 8天),夹子组为3天(2 - 6天),无显著差异(p = 0.0733)。
夹子结扎和整块缝合技术彼此并无优势。我们的结果还表明,两种技术都是安全可行的。我们建议根据外科医生的经验和医院设施选择方法。