Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜脾切除术:钛夹结扎还是整块吻合器切除?

Laparoscopic splenectomy: clip ligation or en-bloc stapling?

作者信息

Türkoğlu Ahmet, Oğuz Abdullah, Yaman Gizem, Gül Mesut, Ülger Burak Veli

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Dicle University School of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):273-277. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4276. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Various techniques are used in the management of splenic hilum during laparoscopic splenectomy. Among them, the most used ones are polymer clips, en-bloc stapling and ultrasonic devices. To the best of our knowledge, there is no study in the literature comparing the results of clip and stapler techniques. This study was aimed to compare our results of clip ligation and en-bloc stapling of the splenic hilum.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The records of 67 patients undergoing laparoscopic splenectomy between December 2012 and October 2017 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method (stapler group: 26 patients and clip group: 41 patients). Patient age, sex, diagnosis, surgical technique, operation time, spleen dimensions, perioperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, blood transfusions, postoperative thrombocyte and hemoglobin levels were recorded.

RESULTS

Operating time was median 115 min (75-230) in the stapler group and 120 min (60-210) in the clip group, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p= 0.2593). There were no significant difference between the groups in terms of the postoperative complications (p= 0.59). Postop- erative hospital stay was median 3.5 (2-8) days in the stapler group and 3 (2-6) days in the clip group with no significant difference (p= 0.0733).

CONCLUSION

Clip ligation and en-bloc stapling techniques have no superiority over each other. Our results also showed that both techniques are safe and feasible. We suggest opting for the method according to the surgeon's experience and hospital facilities.

摘要

目的

在腹腔镜脾切除术中,脾门处理采用了多种技术。其中,最常用的是聚合物夹、整块缝合器和超声设备。据我们所知,文献中尚无比较夹子和缝合器技术结果的研究。本研究旨在比较我们采用夹子结扎和整块缝合脾门的结果。

材料与方法

回顾了2012年12月至2017年10月期间67例行腹腔镜脾切除术患者的记录。根据手术方法将患者分为两组(缝合器组:26例患者;夹子组:41例患者)。记录患者的年龄、性别、诊断、手术技术、手术时间、脾脏大小、围手术期并发症、术后住院时间、输血情况、术后血小板和血红蛋白水平。

结果

缝合器组手术时间中位数为115分钟(75 - 230分钟),夹子组为120分钟(60 - 210分钟),两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.2593)。两组术后并发症方面无显著差异(p = 0.59)。缝合器组术后住院时间中位数为3.5天(2 - 8天),夹子组为3天(2 - 6天),无显著差异(p =  0.0733)。

结论

夹子结扎和整块缝合技术彼此并无优势。我们的结果还表明,两种技术都是安全可行的。我们建议根据外科医生的经验和医院设施选择方法。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic splenectomy: clip ligation or en-bloc stapling?
Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):273-277. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4276. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy.
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):192-196. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19.
3
En-bloc stapling of the splenic hilum in laparoscopic splenectomy.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(6):360-2. doi: 10.1080/13645700701699414.
5
En bloc stapling of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.037.
6
Current status of en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Sep;20(7):631-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0435.
7
Advantages of en bloc hilar ligation during laparoscopic extirpative renal surgery.
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1503-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0380.
9
Goldfinger bypassing and en bloc stapling without dissection of renal vessels during laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Dec 27;94(4):380-383. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.4.380.

本文引用的文献

1
20 years' experience with laparoscopic splenectomy. Single center outcomes of a cohort study of 500 cases.
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:285-292. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.042. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenia.
Surg Today. 2018 Feb;48(2):180-185. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1570-2. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
3
A two-step control of secondary splenic pedicles using ligasure during laparoscopic splenectomy.
Int J Med Sci. 2012;9(9):743-7. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4862. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
4
Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure or clip ligation?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Apr;22(2):136-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318246d9a4.
5
6
Laparoscopic Splenectomy Using LigaSure.
JSLS. 2010 Oct-Dec;14(4):547-52. doi: 10.4293/108680810X12924466008286.
7
The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia.
Blood. 2011 Apr 21;117(16):4190-207. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-302984. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
8
En-bloc stapling of the splenic hilum in laparoscopic splenectomy.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(6):360-2. doi: 10.1080/13645700701699414.
9
Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency: LigaSure device.
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jun;20(6):991-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0470-5. Epub 2006 May 11.
10
Laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of splenomegaly.
Am J Surg. 2004 May;187(5):618-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验