• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾血管控制技术的比较
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):192-196. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19.
2
Efficacy and safety of en bloc ligation of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术中肾门整块结扎的疗效与安全性
Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):226-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.046. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
3
Does the stapler for en bloc resection of renal pedicles during kidney removal surgery increase the risk of arteriovenous fistula?在肾切除术的整块切除肾蒂手术中,订书机是否会增加动静脉瘘的风险?
J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;82(3):221-224. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000032.
4
Advantages of en bloc hilar ligation during laparoscopic extirpative renal surgery.腹腔镜肾切除术中整块肾门结扎的优势
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1503-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0380.
5
En bloc ligation of renal vessels is safe and reduces duration of surgery.肾血管整块结扎是安全的,并且可缩短手术时间。
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
6
Comparative analysis of pedicular vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy: en bloc stapling or separate ligation?腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾蒂血管控制技术的比较分析:整块缝合钉合还是分别结扎?
Urol Int. 2015;94(1):79-82. doi: 10.1159/000363250. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Safety of en bloc ligation of the renal hilum during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌时肾门整块结扎的安全性:一项随机对照试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):489-94. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0444. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
8
En bloc stapling of renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术和肾输尿管切除术期间肾蒂的整块缝合钉合术
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.05.037.
9
Laparoscopic splenectomy: clip ligation or en-bloc stapling?腹腔镜脾切除术:钛夹结扎还是整块吻合器切除?
Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):273-277. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4276. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Prospective radiographic followup after en bloc ligation of the renal hilum.肾门整块结扎术后的前瞻性影像学随访。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1888-91; discussion 1891. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of En Bloc Renal Hilar Vascular Staple Ligation: A Meta-Analysis.整块肾脏肾门血管吻合钉结扎的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):175-181. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
2
En bloc ligation of renal vessels is safe and reduces duration of surgery.肾血管整块结扎是安全的,并且可缩短手术时间。
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
3
Simplifying laparoscopic nephrectomy: the inferior approach with en bloc stapling of the renal hilum.简化腹腔镜肾切除术:经下途径整块缝合肾蒂。
JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00029.
4
Comparative analysis of pedicular vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy: en bloc stapling or separate ligation?腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾蒂血管控制技术的比较分析:整块缝合钉合还是分别结扎?
Urol Int. 2015;94(1):79-82. doi: 10.1159/000363250. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
5
The risk of arteriovenous fistula formation after en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies.经腹腹腔镜肾切除术中肾门整块缝合后动静脉瘘形成的风险。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):80-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f6721.
6
Safety of en bloc ligation of the renal hilum during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌时肾门整块结扎的安全性:一项随机对照试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Jun;23(6):489-94. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0444. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
7
The unacknowledged incidence of laparoscopic stapler malfunction.腹腔镜吻合器故障的未被承认发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):86-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2417-y. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
Current status of en bloc stapling of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy.腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾门整块缝合钉合的现状
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Sep;20(7):631-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0435.
9
Advantages of en bloc hilar ligation during laparoscopic extirpative renal surgery.腹腔镜肾切除术中整块肾门结扎的优势
J Endourol. 2009 Sep;23(9):1503-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0380.
10
Prospective radiographic followup after en bloc ligation of the renal hilum.肾门整块结扎术后的前瞻性影像学随访。
J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1888-91; discussion 1891. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.042. Epub 2007 Sep 17.

腹腔镜肾切除术期间肾血管控制技术的比较

A comparison of renal vascular control techniques during laparoscopic nephrectomy.

作者信息

Koc Gokhan, Ekin Gokhan Rahmi, Ergani Batuhan, Ilbey Yusuf Ozlem

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tepecik Teaching and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Urla Government Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):192-196. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19.

DOI:10.4103/jmas.JMAS_287_19
PMID:33723183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8083737/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared outcomes of en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum with separate Hem-o-lok polymer clip ligation of the renal vessels during laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical data of patients who underwent LN for renal surgery from January 2009 to December 2015 were collected. Operation time, estimated blood loss, device malfunction rate, open conversion rate, complications and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) formation were evaluated.

RESULTS

En bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation were performed in 64 and 66 patients, respectively. The mean operative time was 106.8 ± 20.8 min (range: 70-165) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 112.5 ± 24.1 min (range: 70-180) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.147). The mean estimated blood loss was 141.4 ± 124.1 ml (range: 25-600) in the en bloc stapler ligation group compared with 147.6 ± 112.4 ml (range: 25-450) in the separate clip ligation group (P = 0.767). The open conversion was required in 7/64 (10.9%) and 2/66 (3.0%) patients in the en bloc stapler ligation and separate clip ligation groups, respectively (P = 0.093). Stapler device malfunction occurred in 6 patients (9.3%). There were no statistically significant differences in overall complications (P = 0.726), minor (Grade 1-2) complications (P = 0.698) and major (Grade 3-5) complications (P = 0.716). No patient was diagnosed with AVF formation during overall median 33-month (interquartile range: 30, range: 24-96) follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum during nephrectomy is an effective and safe technique. Although there is no reported AVF formation with en bloc stapler ligation of the renal hilum, longer follow-up is necessary.

摘要

背景

我们比较了腹腔镜肾切除术(LN)期间肾门整体吻合器结扎与肾血管单独使用Hem-o-lok聚合物夹结扎的效果。

材料与方法

收集2009年1月至2015年12月因肾脏手术接受LN的患者的临床资料。评估手术时间、估计失血量、器械故障率、开放手术转换率、并发症及动静脉瘘(AVF)形成情况。

结果

分别对64例和66例患者进行了肾门整体吻合器结扎和单独夹闭结扎。肾门整体吻合器结扎组的平均手术时间为106.8±20.8分钟(范围:70 - 165分钟),而单独夹闭结扎组为112.5±24.1分钟(范围:70 - 180分钟)(P = 0.147)。肾门整体吻合器结扎组的平均估计失血量为141.4±124.1毫升(范围:25 - 600毫升),单独夹闭结扎组为147.6±112.4毫升(范围:25 - 450毫升)(P = 0.767)。肾门整体吻合器结扎组和单独夹闭结扎组分别有7/64(10.9%)和2/66(3.0%)的患者需要进行开放手术转换(P = 0.093)。吻合器器械故障发生在6例患者(9.3%)。总体并发症(P = 0.726)、轻微(1 - 2级)并发症(P = 0.698)和严重(3 - 5级)并发症(P = 0.716)方面无统计学显著差异。在总体中位33个月(四分位间距:30,范围:24 - 96)的随访期间,无患者被诊断为AVF形成。

结论

肾切除术期间肾门整体吻合器结扎是一种有效且安全的技术。尽管尚无肾门整体吻合器结扎导致AVF形成的报道,但仍需要更长时间的随访。