Suppr超能文献

腹部触诊和叩诊手法不影响肠鸣音。

Abdominal palpation and percussion maneuvers do not affect bowel sounds.

作者信息

Çalış Ayşe Sena, Kaya Esra, Mehmetaj Lijana, Yılmaz Büşra, Demir Elif Nurdan, Öztuna Derya, Üstüner Evren, Açar Halil İbrahim, Tokgöz Serhat, Akkoca Muzaffer, Kuzu Mehmet Ayhan

机构信息

Medical Student, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Biostatistics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):309-313. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4291. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Medical textbooks suggest that the frequency of bowel sounds may be altered by performing auscultation after palpation or percussion. We hypothesize that the frequency of bowel sounds is not affected by the order of abdominal examination.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Both healthy volunteers (n= 80) and patients (n= 100) were enrolled in this crossover randomized study. Two different examination orders, one as inspection, palpation, percussion, auscultation (IPPA) and the other order as inspection, auscultation, palpation, percussion (IAPP) were used by two observers, one of which was blinded to the order of the physical examination and only performed auscultation. Bowel motilities of 40 participants were analyzed with duplex Doppler USG by a radiologist. The effects of changing the order of abdominal examination and palpation-percussion maneuvers on the frequency of bowel sounds were evaluated.

RESULTS

Gender distribution was similar between the healthy patients and controls, and mean age of the entire study population was 47 (18-60) years. Differences between the mean bowel sound frequencies for abdominal examinations in order IPPA-IAPP versus IAPP-IPPA were evaluated for both healthy subjects and the patients. There were no differences between the first and second listening, nor were there differences between examinations performed in either order. Duplex Doppler Ultrasonographic (USG) assessments were performed on 20 healthy subjects and 20 patients before and after palpation and percussion; there were no statistically significant differences between the two listenings (p= 0.694).

CONCLUSION

According to both abdominal examinations and Doppler USG, the order of auscultation, whether performed before or after palpation or percussion, did not change the frequency of bowel sounds in this subject population.

摘要

目的

医学教科书表明,在触诊或叩诊后进行听诊可能会改变肠鸣音的频率。我们假设肠鸣音的频率不受腹部检查顺序的影响。

材料与方法

健康志愿者(n = 80)和患者(n = 100)均纳入本交叉随机研究。两名观察者采用两种不同的检查顺序,一种是视诊、触诊、叩诊、听诊(IPPA),另一种是视诊、听诊、触诊、叩诊(IAPP),其中一名观察者对体格检查顺序不知情,仅负责听诊。一名放射科医生使用双功能多普勒超声对40名参与者的肠动力进行分析。评估改变腹部检查顺序以及触诊 - 叩诊操作对肠鸣音频率的影响。

结果

健康患者与对照组的性别分布相似,整个研究人群的平均年龄为47岁(18 - 60岁)。对健康受试者和患者分别评估了按IPPA - IAPP顺序与IAPP - IPPA顺序进行腹部检查时肠鸣音平均频率的差异。首次听诊与第二次听诊之间无差异,两种顺序的检查之间也无差异。对20名健康受试者和20名患者在触诊和叩诊前后进行了双功能多普勒超声(USG)评估;两次听诊之间无统计学显著差异(p = 0.694)。

结论

根据腹部检查和多普勒超声检查结果,无论听诊在触诊或叩诊之前还是之后进行,该研究人群的肠鸣音频率均未改变。

相似文献

1
Abdominal palpation and percussion maneuvers do not affect bowel sounds.腹部触诊和叩诊手法不影响肠鸣音。
Turk J Surg. 2019 Dec 16;35(4):309-313. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4291. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Respiratory assessment.呼吸评估。
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(9):484-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.9.484.
7
Usefulness of bowel sound auscultation: a prospective evaluation.肠鸣音听诊的实用性:一项前瞻性评估。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
The lung exam.
Clin Chest Med. 1987 Jun;8(2):265-72.

本文引用的文献

1
Usefulness of bowel sound auscultation: a prospective evaluation.肠鸣音听诊的实用性:一项前瞻性评估。
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):768-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
3
How useful are bowel sounds in assessing the abdomen?肠鸣音在腹部评估中有多大作用?
Dig Surg. 2010;27(5):422-6. doi: 10.1159/000319372. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
4
Look, feel, listen or look, listen, feel?
Am J Med. 2007 Feb;120(2):e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.05.064.
7
Is abdominal auscultation important?
Lancet. 1982 Dec 4;2(8310):1279. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90134-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验