Sugrue M, Redfern M
Department of Surgery and Experimental Physics, University College Galway, Ireland.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994 Mar;18(2):139-44.
We assessed bowel sounds in controls and patients with acute abdominal conditions using a new computer-aided sound analysis system (C.A.S.A.S.). Sixty-three controls and 61 patients with an acute abdomen had 10-min recordings of bowel sounds in a silent environment with computer analysis of the digitized acoustic signal. Mean bowel sound length was 20 +/- 1.3 ms in controls, 32 +/- 30 ms in cholecystitis, and 37 +/- 35 ms in intestinal obstruction (p < 0.05; mean +/- sd, Mann-Whitney U test). Similar significant differences existed between controls and acute abdomens in the number of sounds generated, sound intensity, and intervals between sounds. Although they were significantly longer in intestinal obstruction, bowel sounds were reduced in number (0.6 sounds/s) as compared to controls (0.4 sounds/s; p < 0.05). Significant differences were seen in all acoustic parameters in patients stratified for the presence or absence of peritonitis. C.A.S.A.S. allowed an objective scientific assessment of bowel sounds and identified significant differences between bowel sound patterns in controls and patients with an acute abdomen.
我们使用一种新型计算机辅助声音分析系统(C.A.S.A.S.)对对照组和患有急腹症的患者的肠鸣音进行了评估。63名对照组人员和61名急腹症患者在安静环境中进行了10分钟的肠鸣音记录,并对数字化声信号进行计算机分析。对照组的平均肠鸣音时长为20±1.3毫秒,胆囊炎患者为32±30毫秒,肠梗阻患者为37±35毫秒(p<0.05;平均值±标准差,曼-惠特尼U检验)。对照组与急腹症患者在肠鸣音产生的数量、声音强度以及声音间隔方面也存在类似的显著差异。虽然肠梗阻患者的肠鸣音时长明显更长,但其肠鸣音数量(0.6次/秒)与对照组(0.4次/秒;p<0.05)相比有所减少。在根据是否存在腹膜炎进行分层的患者中,所有声学参数均存在显著差异。C.A.S.A.S.能够对肠鸣音进行客观科学的评估,并确定对照组和急腹症患者肠鸣音模式之间的显著差异。