Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Healthpoint, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jul;48(9):2129-2136. doi: 10.1177/0363546520930425. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Some studies reporting clinical outcomes after transosseous-equivalent (TOE) repair have attributed type II rotator cuff failure to excessive bridging suture tension, as it can cause overloading on the medial row. In a previous biomechanical cadaveric study, increasing bridging suture tension over 90 N did not improve the contact area and ultimate failure load of the TOE construct, despite increasing the contact force and contact pressure.
To compare the clinical outcomes of different bridging suture tensions after TOE rotator cuff repair based on the results of a previous biomechanical study.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
A total of 78 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for medium- to large-sized tears were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups according to the applied bridging suture tension: optimum tension group (96.3 ± 4.9 N) and maximum tension group (199.0 ± 20.3 N). Bridging suture tension was measured with a customized tensiometer, as used in the previous biomechanical study. The functional outcome was measured at the final follow-up (27.4 ± 5.9 months [range, 24-45 months]) using the visual analog scale for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score, and the anatomic outcome was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasonography at least 12 months after surgery.
Overall, 64 patients (32 in each group) were analyzed. The functional outcomes improved significantly compared with preoperative values (all < .05) but did not show significant differences between the 2 groups (all > .05). Regarding the anatomic outcomes, the maximum tension group (n = 1; 3.1%) had a significantly lower healing failure rate than the optimum tension group (n = 9; 28.1%) ( = .013). One patient in the maximum tension group had a type II failure.
Maximum bridging suture tension in TOE repair for medium- to large-sized rotator cuff tears provided better anatomic healing with less risk of medial rotator cuff failure, which differs from the results of a previous time-zero biomechanical study.
一些报道经皮等长修复(TOE)后临床结果的研究认为,II 型肩袖撕裂与过大的桥接缝线张力有关,因为它会导致内侧排承受过载。在之前的一项生物力学尸体研究中,尽管桥接缝线张力增加会增加接触力和接触压力,但超过 90N 并不会增加 TOE 结构的接触面积和极限失效负荷。
根据之前的一项生物力学研究结果,比较 TOE 肩袖修复后不同桥接缝线张力的临床结果。
随机对照试验;证据水平,2 级。
前瞻性纳入 78 例接受关节镜下中等至大型肩袖撕裂修复的患者,根据应用的桥接缝线张力随机分为 2 组:最佳张力组(96.3±4.9N)和最大张力组(199.0±20.3N)。桥接缝线张力采用定制张力计测量,该张力计与之前的生物力学研究中使用的相同。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛、美国肩肘外科医生评分(ASES)、简易肩部测试(SST)和 Constant 评分评估功能结局,在术后至少 12 个月时使用磁共振成像(MRI)或超声评估解剖结局。
总体而言,64 例患者(每组 32 例)纳入分析。与术前相比,所有患者的功能结局均显著改善(均<0.05),但 2 组间无显著差异(均>0.05)。在解剖结局方面,最大张力组(n=1;3.1%)的愈合失败率显著低于最佳张力组(n=9;28.1%)(=0.013)。最大张力组中有 1 例患者发生 II 型失败。
对于中等至大型肩袖撕裂,TOE 修复中使用最大桥接缝线张力可获得更好的解剖学愈合效果,并且内侧肩袖失败的风险降低,这与之前的零时生物力学研究结果不同。