Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2020 Jan-Dec;18:2280800020917326. doi: 10.1177/2280800020917326.
To compare the color stability and degree of conversion (DC) of a resin cement containing a dibenzoyl germanium derivative photo-initiator (Variolink Esthetic) to resin cements containing conventional luting agents.
Spectrophotometry and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to compare the color stability and DC, respectively, of Variolink Esthetic compared to Calibra, Variolink-N, and NX3 resin cements. Ten specimens (1 × 2 mm) of each resin cement were photo-polymerized and then subjected to color stability assessments. In addition, 30 samples of each of the four resin cements were prepared and then immersed in three staining solutions (tea, coffee, and distilled water) for two weeks. Changes in color for the immersed versus non-immersed specimens (control specimens) were determined by comparing (lightness), , and (color components), and an overall (color difference) obtained from spectrophotometry assays. One-way analysis of variance and a multiple comparison test (Tukey's test) were used to analyze color stability and DC data. NX3 and Variolink Esthetic resin cements exhibited significantly lower values compared to the dual cured resin cements (Variolink-N and Calibra).
The highest DC values were observed among the photo-polymerized samples of Variolink Esthetic (87.18 ± 2.90%), while the lowest DC values were observed among the Variolink-N samples (44.55 ± 4.33%).
The resin cement, Variolink Esthetic, containing a novel dibenzoyl germanium derivative photo-initiator exhibited superior color stability ( < 0.05) and a higher DC than other resin cements containing conventional luting agents in an in vitro setting.
比较含有二苯甲酰锗衍生物光引发剂(Variolink Esthetic)的树脂水门汀与含有传统黏结剂的树脂水门汀的颜色稳定性和转化率(DC)。
使用分光光度法和傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)分别比较 Variolink Esthetic 与 Calibra、Variolink-N 和 NX3 树脂水门汀的颜色稳定性和 DC。将每种树脂水门汀的 10 个试件(1×2mm)进行光聚合,然后进行颜色稳定性评估。此外,制备每种树脂水门汀的 30 个样本,然后将其浸泡在三种染色溶液(茶、咖啡和蒸馏水)中两周。通过比较分光光度法测定浸泡与未浸泡样本(对照样本)的 (亮度)、 (色调)和 (颜色分量)以及获得的总体 (颜色差异)来确定浸入样本的颜色变化。使用单因素方差分析和多重比较检验(Tukey 检验)分析颜色稳定性和 DC 数据。NX3 和 Variolink Esthetic 树脂水门汀的数值明显低于双固化树脂水门汀(Variolink-N 和 Calibra)。
Variolink Esthetic 光聚合样本的 DC 值最高(87.18±2.90%),而 Variolink-N 样本的 DC 值最低(44.55±4.33%)。
在体外环境下,含有新型二苯甲酰锗衍生物光引发剂的树脂水门汀 Variolink Esthetic 表现出优异的颜色稳定性(<0.05)和更高的 DC,优于含有传统黏结剂的其他树脂水门汀。