• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯和影响函数的经验似然法在诊断试验灵敏度推断中的应用。

Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity in diagnostic tests.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3457-3491. doi: 10.1177/0962280220929042. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1177/0962280220929042
PMID:32552342
Abstract

In medical diagnostic studies, a diagnostic test can be evaluated based on its sensitivity under a desired specificity. Existing methods for inference on sensitivity include normal approximation-based approaches and empirical likelihood (EL)-based approaches. These methods generally have poor performance when the specificity is high, and some require choosing smoothing parameters. We propose a new influence function-based empirical likelihood method and Bayesian empirical likelihood methods to overcome such problems. Numerical studies are performed to compare the finite sample performance of the proposed approaches with existing methods. The proposed methods are shown to perform better in terms of both coverage probability and interval length. A real data set from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ANDI) is analyzed.

摘要

在医学诊断研究中,可以根据所需的特异性来评估诊断测试的灵敏度。现有的灵敏度推断方法包括基于正态逼近的方法和基于经验似然 (EL) 的方法。当特异性较高时,这些方法的性能通常较差,并且有些方法需要选择平滑参数。我们提出了一种新的基于影响函数的经验似然方法和贝叶斯经验似然方法来克服这些问题。进行了数值研究以比较所提出的方法与现有方法的有限样本性能。结果表明,所提出的方法在覆盖概率和区间长度方面都表现更好。分析了来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议 (ANDI) 的真实数据集。

相似文献

1
Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity in diagnostic tests.贝叶斯和影响函数的经验似然法在诊断试验灵敏度推断中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Dec;29(12):3457-3491. doi: 10.1177/0962280220929042. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity to the early diseased stage in diagnostic tests.贝叶斯和影响函数的经验似然在诊断测试中对早期疾病阶段敏感性推断的应用。
Biom J. 2023 Mar;65(3):e2200021. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200021. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
3
A unified Bayesian framework for exact inference of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.一种用于精确推断受试者工作特征曲线下面积的统一贝叶斯框架。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2269-2287. doi: 10.1177/09622802211037070. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
4
Empirical likelihood-based confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity.基于经验似然的固定特异度下连续型诊断试验敏感度的置信区间。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0962280209105512. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
5
Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.贝叶斯二元诊断试验研究的综合嵌套拉普拉斯逼近的荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2010 May 30;29(12):1325-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.3858.
6
Influence function-based empirical likelihood for inference of quantile medical costs with censored data.基于影响函数的经验似然法用于对删失数据分位数医疗费用进行推断
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Jul;29(7):1913-1934. doi: 10.1177/0962280219880573. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Empirical likelihood confidence interval for sensitivity to the early disease stage.针对早期疾病阶段敏感性的经验似然置信区间。
Pharm Stat. 2022 May;21(3):566-583. doi: 10.1002/pst.2186. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
8
Empirical likelihood inference for the area under the ROC curve.受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积的经验似然推断。
Biometrics. 2006 Jun;62(2):613-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00453.x.
9
Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.当边缘敏感性和特异性是推断目标时,单变量和双变量似然比荟萃分析方法的性能相当。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.使用前后分类错误的二项式数据对干预效果进行贝叶斯估计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(1):93-108. doi: 10.1080/10543400601001493.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian and influence function-based empirical likelihoods for inference of sensitivity to the early diseased stage in diagnostic tests.贝叶斯和影响函数的经验似然在诊断测试中对早期疾病阶段敏感性推断的应用。
Biom J. 2023 Mar;65(3):e2200021. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200021. Epub 2023 Jan 15.