Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):339-354. doi: 10.1177/1556264620935223. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
The employment of Big Data as an increasingly used research method has introduced novel challenges to ethical research practices and to ethics committees (ECs) globally. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of scholars with ECs in the ethical evaluation of Big Data projects. Thirty-five interviews were performed with Swiss and American researchers involved in Big Data research in psychology and sociology. The interviews were analyzed using thematic coding. Our respondents reported lack of support from ECs, absence of appropriate expertise among members of the boards, and lack of harmonized evaluation criteria between committees. To implement ECs practices we argue for updating the expertise of board members and the institution of a consultancy model between researchers and ECs.
大数据作为一种越来越常用的研究方法,给全球的伦理研究实践和伦理委员会带来了新的挑战。本研究旨在探讨学者与伦理委员会在大数据项目的伦理评估方面的经验。对参与心理学和社会学大数据研究的 35 名瑞士和美国研究人员进行了访谈。采用主题编码对访谈进行分析。我们的受访者报告说,伦理委员会缺乏支持,委员会成员缺乏适当的专业知识,委员会之间也缺乏协调一致的评估标准。为了实施伦理委员会的实践,我们主张更新董事会成员的专业知识,并在研究人员和伦理委员会之间建立咨询模式。