Nguyen-Khac E, Sarba R, Spahr L, Staszewicz W, DeGottardi A, Storni F, Elkrief L, Dokmak S, Valla D, Pricope D, Sabbagh C, Regimbeau J M
Hepato-Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
Hepato-Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
J Visc Surg. 2021 Feb;158(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
The treatment of symptomatic hernia in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites is critical but challenging. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of the implantation of alfapump® combined with concomitant hernia repair in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites.
Using data from six European centres, we retrospectively compared patients treated with alfapump® system implantation and concomitant hernia repair [the combined treatment group (CT group, n=12)] or with intermittent paracentesis hernia repair [the standard treatment group (ST group, n=26)]. Some patients of the ST group had hernia repair in an elective setting (STel group) and others in emergency (STem group). The endpoints were requirement of peritoneal drainage, the rate of infectious complications, the in-hospital mortality, the length of stay, paracentesis-free survival.
Postoperatively, none of the patients in the CT group and 21 patients (80%) in the ST group underwent peritoneal drainage for the evacuation of ascites fluid (P<0.0001). The overall incidence of infectious complications was not different between groups but there were fewer infections in the CT group than in the STem group (33% vs. 81%; P=0.01). There was no difference for in-hospital mortality. The length of stay was shorter in the CT group (P=0.03). Paracentesis-free survival was significantly better (P=0.0003) in the CT group than in the ST group.
Implantation of alfapump combined with concomitant hernia repair seems feasible and safe in cirrhotic patients; however, larger and randomized study are required.
肝硬化合并难治性腹水患者的症状性疝治疗至关重要但具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估在肝硬化合并难治性腹水患者中植入alfapump®并同时进行疝修补术的可行性和安全性。
利用来自六个欧洲中心的数据,我们回顾性比较了接受alfapump®系统植入并同时进行疝修补术的患者[联合治疗组(CT组,n = 12)]和接受间歇性腹腔穿刺疝修补术的患者[标准治疗组(ST组,n = 26)]。ST组的一些患者在择期情况下进行疝修补术(STel组),另一些患者在急诊情况下进行(STem组)。终点指标为腹腔引流需求、感染并发症发生率、住院死亡率、住院时间、无腹腔穿刺生存期。
术后,CT组无一例患者因腹水引流而进行腹腔引流,ST组有21例患者(80%)进行了腹腔引流(P < 0.0001)。两组间感染并发症的总体发生率无差异,但CT组的感染例数少于STem组(33%对81%;P = 0.01)。住院死亡率无差异。CT组的住院时间较短(P = 0.03)。CT组的无腹腔穿刺生存期明显优于ST组(P = 0.0003)。
在肝硬化患者中植入alfapump并同时进行疝修补术似乎可行且安全;然而,需要进行更大规模的随机研究。