Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, Washington, DC, USA.
Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1513-1520. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1813-8. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
Refractory ascites (RA) is a complication of cirrhosis which is treated with large volume paracentesis (LVP) as the standard of care. Alfapump® system is a fully implantable pump system which reduces the need for LVP. The aim was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients treated with alfapump® versus LVP.
The data were collected in a multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01528410). Subjects with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class B or C accompanied by RA were randomized to receive alfapump® or LVP. The SF-36v2 and CLDQ scores were compared between the two treatment arms at screening and monthly during treatment.
Of 60 subjects randomized, HRQL data were available for 58 (N = 27 received alfapump® and N = 31 received LVP only). At baseline, no differences were seen between the treatment arms (all p > 0.05): age 61.9 ± 8.4, 79.3% male, MELD scores 11.7 ± 3.3, 85.2% Child-Pugh class B, 70.7% had alcoholic cirrhosis. The mean number of LVP events/subject was lower in alfapump® than LVP (1.1 vs. 8.6, p < 0.001). The HRQL scores showed a moderate improvement from the baseline levels in subjects treated with alfapump® (p < 0.05 for abdominal and activity scores of CLDQ) but not with LVP (all one-sided p > 0.05) in the first 3 months. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment with alfapump® was independently associated with better HRQL at 3 months (total CLDQ score: beta = 0.67 ± 0.33, p = 0.05).
As compared to LVP, the use of alfapump® system is associated with both a reduction in the number of LVP events and improvement of health-related quality of life.
难治性腹水(RA)是肝硬化的一种并发症,其治疗方法是标准的大量腹腔穿刺术(LVP)。Alfapump®系统是一种完全可植入的泵系统,可减少 LVP 的需求。目的是评估使用 alfapump®治疗的患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)与 LVP 治疗的患者相比。
数据收集于一项多中心开放标签随机对照试验(clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01528410)。伴有 RA 的 Child-Pugh 分级 B 或 C 级肝硬化患者被随机分为接受 alfapump®或 LVP 治疗。在筛查时和治疗期间每月比较 SF-36v2 和 CLDQ 评分。
在 60 名随机分组的患者中,有 58 名(N = 27 名接受 alfapump®治疗,N = 31 名仅接受 LVP 治疗)提供了 HRQL 数据。基线时,两组之间未见差异(所有 p > 0.05):年龄 61.9 ± 8.4,79.3%为男性,MELD 评分 11.7 ± 3.3,85.2%为 Child-Pugh 分级 B,70.7%为酒精性肝硬化。与 LVP 相比,接受 alfapump®治疗的患者的 LVP 事件/患者数量较低(1.1 次与 8.6 次,p < 0.001)。接受 alfapump®治疗的患者的 HRQL 评分从基线水平开始呈中度改善(CLDQ 的腹部和活动评分 p < 0.05),但接受 LVP 治疗的患者则没有(所有单侧 p > 0.05)在头 3 个月内。多变量分析显示,治疗 3 个月后,使用 alfapump®治疗与 HRQL 更好独立相关(总 CLDQ 评分:β=0.67 ± 0.33,p = 0.05)。
与 LVP 相比,使用 alfapump®系统不仅可减少 LVP 事件的次数,还可提高健康相关生活质量。