Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Aug;158(2):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
Estimate the association between non-surgical management (NSM) (e.g. hormonal or radiation therapy) and overall survival among women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) and identify patient and facility characteristics associated with receipt of NSM.
Women >45 years of age with clinical stage I EEC were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. Women treated with NSM were compared with women treated initially with hysterectomy. Patient and facility characteristics associated with NSM were evaluated using logistic regression models. Association with overall survival was examined using log-rank tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression models with and without propensity score matching (PSM).
A total of 112,469 women underwent treatment for stage I EEC between 2004 and 2016. 2776 (3%) received NSM, of whom 1987 (71%) received radiation therapy, 688 (25%) received hormonal therapy, and 101 (4%) received both. Older age, black race, higher Charlson-Deyo scores, Medicaid insurance, and low annual facility hysterectomy volume were associated with receiving NSM. The 5-year survival rate was 40% (95%CI: 37%-42%) for women with NSM compared to 89% (95%CI: 88%-89%) for hysterectomy. Women treated with NSM died at a faster rate than those who underwent primary hysterectomy (HR 7.6, 95%CI: 7.2-8.0; p < 0.001). This statistically significant difference in survival persisted in adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and after PSM.
Women treated with NSM had a significantly higher risk of death compared to those undergoing hysterectomy for stage I EEC. Caution should be used when selecting patients for NSM given its worse outcomes.
评估非手术治疗(如激素或放射治疗)与 I 期子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌(EEC)女性总生存率之间的关联,并确定与接受非手术治疗相关的患者和医疗机构特征。
本研究于 2004 年至 2016 年期间在国家癌症数据库中确定了年龄大于 45 岁的临床 I 期 EEC 患者。将接受非手术治疗的患者与初始接受子宫切除术治疗的患者进行比较。使用逻辑回归模型评估与非手术治疗相关的患者和医疗机构特征。使用对数秩检验、Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 比例风险回归模型(包括和不包括倾向评分匹配(PSM))检查与总生存率的关联。
在 2004 年至 2016 年间,共有 112469 名女性接受了 I 期 EEC 的治疗。其中 2776 名(3%)接受了非手术治疗,其中 1987 名(71%)接受了放射治疗,688 名(25%)接受了激素治疗,101 名(4%)接受了两种治疗。年龄较大、黑人、较高的 Charlson-Deyo 评分、医疗补助保险和低年度医疗机构子宫切除术量与接受非手术治疗相关。接受非手术治疗的女性 5 年生存率为 40%(95%CI:37%-42%),而接受子宫切除术的女性为 89%(95%CI:88%-89%)。接受非手术治疗的女性死亡速度快于接受子宫切除术的女性(HR 7.6,95%CI:7.2-8.0;p<0.001)。在调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型和 PSM 后,生存的这种统计学显著差异仍然存在。
与接受子宫切除术治疗 I 期 EEC 的女性相比,接受非手术治疗的女性死亡风险显著增加。在选择接受非手术治疗的患者时应谨慎,因为其结局较差。