Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Internal Medicine, Igualada Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Autoimmun Rev. 2020 Aug;19(8):102587. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102587. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
Therapy for advanced melanoma has deeply changed in the last decade with the introduction of checkpoint and BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Granulomatous reactions have been reported related to these drugs. We performed a systematic review of all the cases described in the medical literature by the search (("Melanoma"[Mesh]) AND ("Sarcoidosis"[Mesh] OR "Granuloma"[Mesh])). Ninety-one patients under immunotherapy were included in the analyses. The time from the initiation of the immunotherapy until the onset of sarcoidosis or sarcoid-like reaction (SLR) was 7.1 months (SD 9). Peripheral lymph nodes as the mode of onset were seen more frequently in patients under CTLA-4 inhibitors (p = .016) whereas in patients under BRAF/MEK inhibitors used to be in the form of specific skin lesions (p = .006). Chest X-ray stage I-II was the rule in the CTLA-4 and PD-1 groups. On the contrary, stage 0 accounted for 80% of the patients in the BRAF/MEK group examined for pulmonary involvement. Specific skin involvement was the most common manifestation apart from pulmonary involvement. It was more frequent in patients under BRAF/MEK inhibitors and especially in the form of papules. Splenic involvement was found also more frequently in patients under CTLA-4 inhibitors. Specific treatment for sarcoidosis/SLR was prescribed in 50 patients (58.8%), without differences among groups. Almost all patients presented a good prognosis independently of the decision made regarding their previous immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Physicians should bear in mind the possibility of sarcoidosis/SLR after the initiation of checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma, especially in the form of skin involvement and mediastinal and peripheral lymph nodes. It is important to achieve an accurate diagnosis to rule out the possibility of cancer involvement. What to do with these drugs is yet to be clarified. It seems reasonable to prioritize cancer treatment so it is not mandatory to stop these drugs.
在过去的十年中,随着检查点和 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂的引入,晚期黑色素瘤的治疗发生了深刻变化。已经报道了与这些药物相关的肉芽肿反应。我们通过搜索(("Melanoma"[Mesh]) AND ("Sarcoidosis"[Mesh] OR "Granuloma"[Mesh]))对医学文献中描述的所有病例进行了系统回顾。共有 91 名接受免疫治疗的患者纳入分析。从免疫治疗开始到出现结节病或结节病样反应(SLR)的时间为 7.1 个月(SD 9)。CTLA-4 抑制剂治疗的患者中更常见以外周淋巴结为首发模式(p = 0.016),而 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂治疗的患者中更常见以特定皮肤病变为首发模式(p = 0.006)。CTLA-4 和 PD-1 组的胸部 X 线分期为 I-II 期。相反,BRAF/MEK 组中有 80%的患者检查到肺受累时处于 0 期。除了肺受累外,特异性皮肤受累是最常见的表现。它在 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂治疗的患者中更为常见,特别是以丘疹的形式出现。脾受累也在 CTLA-4 抑制剂治疗的患者中更为常见。50 名患者(58.8%)接受了结节病/SLR 的特异性治疗,各组之间无差异。几乎所有患者均表现出良好的预后,与他们先前免疫治疗的决策无关。结论:在诊断为晚期黑色素瘤的患者中,启动检查点或 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂后,医生应牢记出现结节病/SLR 的可能性,尤其是以皮肤受累和纵隔及外周淋巴结形式出现时。获得准确的诊断以排除癌症受累的可能性很重要。对于这些药物该如何处理尚不清楚。优先考虑癌症治疗似乎是合理的,因此不必停止这些药物。