Suppr超能文献

激活素 A 不会导致创伤后异位骨化。

Activin A does not drive post-traumatic heterotopic ossification.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY, USA.

出版信息

Bone. 2020 Sep;138:115473. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115473. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Abstract

Heterotopic ossification (HO), the formation of ectopic bone in soft tissues, has been extensively studied in its two primary forms: post-traumatic HO (tHO) typically found in patients who have experienced musculoskeletal or neurogenic injury and in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), where it is genetically driven. Given that in both diseases HO arises via endochondral ossification, the molecular mechanisms behind both diseases have been postulated to be manifestations of similar pathways including those activated by BMP/TGFβ superfamily ligands. A significant step towards understanding the molecular mechanism by which HO arises in FOP was the discovery that FOP causing ACVR1 variants trigger HO in response to activin A, a ligand that does not activate signaling from wild type ACVR1, and that is not inherently osteogenic in wild type settings. The physiological significance of this finding was demonstrated by showing that activin A neutralizing antibodies stop HO in two different genetically accurate mouse models of FOP. In order to explore the role of activin A in tHO, we performed single cell RNA sequencing and compared the expression of activin A as well as other BMP pathway genes in tHO and FOP HO. We show that activin A is expressed in response to injury in both settings, but by different types of cells. Given that wild type ACVR1 does not transduce signal when engaged by activin A, we hypothesized that inhibition of activin A will not block tHO. Nonetheless, as activin A was expressed in tHO lesions, we tested its inhibition and compared it with inhibition of BMPs. We show here that anti-activin A does not block tHO, whereas agents such as antibodies that neutralize ACVR1 or ALK3-Fc (which blocks osteogenic BMPs) are beneficial, though not completely curative. These results demonstrate that inhibition of activin A should not be considered as a therapeutic strategy for ameliorating tHO.

摘要

异位骨化(HO),即在软组织中形成异位骨,已在其两种主要形式中得到广泛研究:创伤后 HO(tHO)通常见于经历过肌肉骨骼或神经损伤的患者,以及纤维发育不良性骨化进展症(FOP),其中它是由遗传驱动的。鉴于在这两种疾病中,HO 都是通过软骨内骨化形成的,因此推测这两种疾病的分子机制是相似途径的表现,包括那些被 BMP/TGFβ 超家族配体激活的途径。了解 FOP 中 HO 形成的分子机制的一个重要步骤是发现 FOP 致病 ACVR1 变体在受到激活素 A 的刺激时会引发 HO,而激活素 A 不会激活野生型 ACVR1 的信号,并且在野生型环境中本身也不是成骨的。这一发现的生理意义通过显示激活素 A 中和抗体在两种不同的 FOP 基因准确的小鼠模型中阻止 HO 得到了证明。为了探索激活素 A 在 tHO 中的作用,我们进行了单细胞 RNA 测序,并比较了 tHO 和 FOP HO 中激活素 A 以及其他 BMP 通路基因的表达。我们表明,在这两种情况下,激活素 A 都是在受到损伤后表达的,但由不同类型的细胞表达。鉴于野生型 ACVR1 在被激活素 A 结合时不会传递信号,我们假设抑制激活素 A 不会阻断 tHO。尽管如此,由于激活素 A 在 tHO 病变中表达,我们测试了其抑制作用,并将其与 BMP 抑制作用进行了比较。我们在这里表明,抗激活素 A 不会阻断 tHO,而诸如中和 ACVR1 或 ALK3-Fc(阻断成骨性 BMP)的抗体等药物则是有益的,尽管不是完全治愈的。这些结果表明,抑制激活素 A 不应被视为改善 tHO 的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验