Suppr超能文献

Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy 诊断膀胱癌的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic Performance of Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for the Detection of Bladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2020;104(7-8):523-532. doi: 10.1159/000508417. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in detection of bladder cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on CLE in diagnosing bladder cancer in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. A bivariate meta-regression model was used for meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled diagnostic value of CLE.

RESULTS

A total of 5 eligible studies involving 302 lesions were available for this meta-analysis. In a per-lesion analysis, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver-operating curve (SROC) area under the curve (AUC) of CLE for malignant lesions were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.94), 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.82), 3.20 (95% CI: 2.14-4.79), 0.14 (95% CI: 0.09-0.21), 23.27 (95% CI: 11.71-46.25), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. For low-grade urothelial carcinomas, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC for CLE were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.57-0.84), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.93), 5.48 (95% CI: 3.12-9.62), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.20-0.50), 17.19 (95% CI: 8.01-36.89), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), respectively. For high-grade urothelial carcinomas, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC for CLE were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.62-0.92), 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73-0.91), 4.96 (95% CI: 2.58-9.54), 0.22 (95% CI: 0.09-0.52), 22.49 (95% CI: 5.33-94.85), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CLE is a promising endoscopy technique for real-time tumor grading of bladder cancer.

摘要

目的

系统评价共聚焦激光内镜(CLE)在膀胱癌诊断中的诊断效能。

方法

在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行了系统的 CLE 诊断膀胱癌的文献检索。使用双变量 meta 回归模型进行 meta 分析,以评估 CLE 的汇总诊断价值。

结果

共纳入 5 项符合条件的研究,涉及 302 个病灶,可用于本次 meta 分析。在病灶水平的分析中,CLE 对恶性病灶的汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断比值比(DOR)和汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.90(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.85-0.94)、0.72(95% CI:0.59-0.82)、3.20(95% CI:2.14-4.79)、0.14(95% CI:0.09-0.21)、23.27(95% CI:11.71-46.25)和 0.91(95% CI:0.89-0.94)。对于低级别尿路上皮癌,CLE 的汇总敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR 和 AUC 分别为 0.72(95% CI:0.57-0.84)、0.87(95% CI:0.77-0.93)、5.48(95% CI:3.12-9.62)、0.32(95% CI:0.20-0.50)、17.19(95% CI:8.01-36.89)和 0.85(95% CI:0.82-0.88)。对于高级别尿路上皮癌,CLE 的汇总敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR 和 AUC 分别为 0.82(95% CI:0.62-0.92)、0.84(95% CI:0.73-0.91)、4.96(95% CI:2.58-9.54)、0.22(95% CI:0.09-0.52)、22.49(95% CI:5.33-94.85)和 0.89(95% CI:0.86-0.91)。

结论

CLE 是一种很有前途的实时肿瘤分级内镜技术,可用于膀胱癌的诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验