UGA Concussion Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens.
J Athl Train. 2020 Jul 1;55(7):666-672. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-340-19.
Athletic trainers (ATs) are heavily involved in concussion assessment and return-to-play (RTP) decision making. Despite ATs' crucial role, few researchers have directly examined ATs' knowledge of concussions or whether concussion knowledge or clinical experience affects clinical concussion-management practices.
To determine the overall concussion knowledge of ATs and whether concussion knowledge and clinical experience affect concussion-assessment and -management practices.
Cross-sectional study.
Online survey.
Random convenience sample of 8725 (15.0% response rate [1307/8725]; certified, 14.8 ± 10.6 years) ATs surveyed from the National Athletic Trainers' Association membership.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The survey collected demographics, concussion-assessment and -management tools used, and concussion knowledge (patient-clinician scenarios, signs and symptoms recognition). We used multiple logistic regression models to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for using assessment and management tools based on signs and symptoms recognition and years of clinical experience.
The ATs correctly identified 78.0% ± 15.1% of concussion signs and symptoms. Approximately 46% (357/770) of ATs indicated an athlete could RTP if the athlete stated he or she had a "bell rung." Every additional year of clinical experience decreased the odds of using standardized sideline-assessment tools by 3% (OR = 0.97, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 0.95, 0.99). The odds of using standardized sideline tools (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96, 0.99) and symptom checklists (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97, 0.99) for RTP assessment were significantly decreased for each additional year of clinical experience. No other tools used for RTP assessment were influenced by signs and symptoms recognition (P ≥ .136) or clinical experience (P ≥ .158).
The ATs with greater clinical experience had lower odds of using concussion-assessment and -management tools. Athletic trainers should frequently review and implement current consensus guidelines into clinical practice to improve concussion recognition and prevent improper management.
运动训练员(ATs)在脑震荡评估和重返赛场(RTP)决策中发挥了重要作用。尽管 ATs 扮演着关键角色,但很少有研究人员直接研究 ATs 对脑震荡的了解程度,或者脑震荡知识或临床经验是否会影响临床脑震荡管理实践。
确定 ATs 对脑震荡的总体认知水平,以及脑震荡知识和临床经验是否影响脑震荡评估和管理实践。
横断面研究。
在线调查。
从全国运动训练员协会会员中随机抽取 8725 名(15.0%的回复率[1307/8725];认证的,14.8±10.6 岁)ATs 进行调查。
该调查收集了人口统计学资料、使用的脑震荡评估和管理工具以及脑震荡知识(患者-临床医生场景、体征和症状识别)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,根据体征和症状识别以及临床经验年限来确定使用评估和管理工具的优势比(ORs)。
ATs 正确识别了 78.0%±15.1%的脑震荡体征和症状。大约 46%(357/770)的 ATs 表示,如果运动员说他或她“感到铃声响起”,运动员可以重返赛场。每增加一年的临床经验,使用标准化的场边评估工具的几率就会降低 3%(OR=0.97,95%置信区间[CI]:0.95,0.99)。使用标准化的场边工具(OR=0.98,95%CI:0.96,0.99)和症状检查表(OR=0.98,95%CI:0.97,0.99)进行 RTP 评估的几率也随着临床经验的增加而显著降低(每年 OR=0.98,95%CI:0.97,0.99)。没有其他用于 RTP 评估的工具受到体征和症状识别(P≥.136)或临床经验(P≥.158)的影响。
临床经验更丰富的 ATs 使用脑震荡评估和管理工具的几率较低。运动训练员应定期审查并将当前的共识指南纳入临床实践,以提高对脑震荡的认识,防止不当管理。