• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疼痛性II型舟状骨:一种标准化、可重复的分类系统介绍。

Painful type II os naviculare: introduction of a standardized, reproducible classification system.

作者信息

Kamel Sarah I, Belair Jeffrey A, Hegazi Tarek M, Halpern Ethan J, Desai Vishal, Morrison William B, Zoga Adam C

机构信息

Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Main Building 1090, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

Department of Radiology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Dec;49(12):1977-1985. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03503-y. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00256-020-03503-y
PMID:32556471
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide a novel MRI classification system for the symptomatic type II os naviculare by creating a standardized grading of associated bone marrow edema (BME) and correlating with patient symptoms.

METHODS

BME was classified on an ordinal scale: grade 1, faint signal immediately adjacent to the synchondrosis; grade 2, intermediate signal within the os and navicular tuberosity without extending to the navicular body; grade 3, intense signal extending to the navicular body. BME on 59 MRIs was independently graded by three radiologists. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed for patient and imaging characteristics predictive of subjective pain score. A cohort of 82 patients without BME represented a control group.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement of BME grade was 0.95 (CI 0.93-0.97) and intra-observer was 0.92 (CI 0.87-0.96), indicating excellent agreement. In patients with BME, predictors of more severe pain were longer duration of pain (p = 0.02) and presence of soft tissue edema overlying the os naviculare (p < 0.001). One hundred percent of subjects with BME localized their pain to the medial midfoot (59/59) versus 25.6% (21/82) of controls (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel grading system provides reliable quantification of BME associated with os naviculare, which is a specific cause of medial foot/ankle pain. Early diagnosis is important as pain severity worsens with longer duration of symptoms. Pain severity is correlated with soft tissue edema overlying the os, which may be secondary to extrinsic compression, reactive to biomechanical stress, or reflect direct trauma.

摘要

目的

通过创建相关骨髓水肿(BME)的标准化分级并与患者症状相关联,为有症状的II型舟状骨提供一种新的MRI分类系统。

方法

BME按顺序量表分类:1级,紧邻软骨结合处的微弱信号;2级,舟状骨和舟状结节内的中等信号,未延伸至舟状骨体;3级,强烈信号延伸至舟状骨体。59例MRI上的BME由三位放射科医生独立分级。使用组内相关系数分析观察者间和观察者内的一致性。单因素和多因素分析评估预测主观疼痛评分的患者和影像学特征。82例无BME的患者组成一个对照组。

结果

BME分级的观察者间一致性为0.95(CI 0.93 - 0.97),观察者内一致性为0.92(CI 0.87 - 0.96),表明一致性极佳。在有BME的患者中,疼痛更严重的预测因素是疼痛持续时间更长(p = 0.02)以及舟状骨上方存在软组织水肿(p < 0.001)。100%有BME的受试者将疼痛定位在内侧中足(59/59),而对照组为25.6%(21/82)(p < 0.001)。

结论

这种新的分级系统为与舟状骨相关的BME提供了可靠的量化,舟状骨是足内侧/踝关节疼痛的一个特定原因。早期诊断很重要,因为疼痛严重程度会随着症状持续时间延长而加重。疼痛严重程度与舟状骨上方的软组织水肿相关,这可能继发于外部压迫、对生物力学应力的反应或反映直接创伤。

相似文献

1
Painful type II os naviculare: introduction of a standardized, reproducible classification system.疼痛性II型舟状骨:一种标准化、可重复的分类系统介绍。
Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Dec;49(12):1977-1985. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03503-y. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
The relationship of MRI findings and clinical features in symptomatic and asymptomatic os naviculare.症状性与无症状性舟状骨异常的 MRI 表现与临床特征的关系。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Jan;74(1):80.e1-80.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.09.013. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
3
Do Not Judge an Ossicle by Its Size: Type 1 Ossicles Associated With Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction.勿以大小评判小骨:与胫后肌腱功能障碍相关的1型小骨
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Nov/Dec;44(6):993-997. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001089.
4
Foot and Ankle Bone Marrow Edema Assessment in Long Distance Runners.长跑运动员足踝部骨髓水肿评估
Foot Ankle Int. 2023 Dec;44(12):1231-1238. doi: 10.1177/10711007231201332. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Osteitis condensans ilii may demonstrate bone marrow edema on sacroiliac joint magnetic resonance imaging.致密性骨炎在骶髂关节磁共振成像上可能显示骨髓水肿。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;21(1):299-307. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13125. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies.疼痛性II型副舟骨的磁共振成像表现:与手术及病理研究的相关性
Korean J Radiol. 2004 Oct-Dec;5(4):274-9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.274.
7
The incidence of accessory navicular bone types in Turkish subjects.土耳其人群中副舟骨类型的发生率。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2009 Nov;31(9):675-9. doi: 10.1007/s00276-009-0502-2. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
8
The Presence and Degree of Bone Marrow Edema Influence Midterm Clinical Outcomes After Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus.骨髓水肿的存在和程度对距骨骨软骨病变微骨折术后中期临床结果的影响。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;46(10):2503-2508. doi: 10.1177/0363546518782701. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Os naviculare: the multi-ossicle configuration of a normal variant.舟骨:一种正常变异的多骨结构。
Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Jan;40(1):85-8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-0944-y. Epub 2010 May 9.
10
Predicting Bone Marrow Edema and Fracture Age in Vertebral Fragility Fractures Using MDCT.基于 MDCT 预测椎体脆性骨折骨髓水肿及骨折时间
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Oct;215(4):970-977. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22606. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The prevalence and anatomy of accessory navicular bone: a meta-analysis.副舟骨的患病率及解剖结构:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Oct;46(10):1731-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03459-x. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
2
Accessory navicular in children.儿童副舟骨
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Dec 16;11(35):8256-8262. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8256.
3
Symptomatic Patient With Two Separate Accessory Navicular Bones.患有两块独立副舟骨的有症状患者。

本文引用的文献

1
Accessory Navicular Syndrome in Athlete vs General Population.运动员与普通人群中的副舟骨综合征
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Aug;37(8):862-7. doi: 10.1177/1071100716644791. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
Simple excision vs the Kidner procedure for type 2 accessory navicular associated with flatfoot in pediatric population.单纯切除与 Kidner 手术治疗儿童 2 型副舟骨并平足
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Feb;34(2):167-72. doi: 10.1177/1071100712467616. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
3
New MRI grading system for the cervical canal stenosis.新的颈椎管狭窄症 MRI 分级系统。
Cureus. 2023 Oct 28;15(10):e47881. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47881. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Bone bruise vs. non-displaced fracture on MRI: a novel grading system for predicting return-to-play.MRI 上的骨挫伤与无移位骨折:一种预测重返赛场的新分级系统。
Skeletal Radiol. 2024 May;53(5):947-955. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04504-3. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jul;197(1):W134-40. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.5560.
4
Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular.疼痛性副舟骨与主舟骨融合的结果
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Feb;30(2):106-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0106.
5
The reliability of measuring physical characteristics of spiculated masses on mammography.乳腺钼靶摄影中测量毛刺状肿块物理特征的可靠性。
Br J Radiol. 2006 Dec;79 Spec No 2:S134-40. doi: 10.1259/bjr/96723280.
6
MR imaging findings of painful type II accessory navicular bone: correlation with surgical and pathologic studies.疼痛性II型副舟骨的磁共振成像表现:与手术及病理研究的相关性
Korean J Radiol. 2004 Oct-Dec;5(4):274-9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.4.274.
7
Imaging of the symptomatic type II accessory navicular bone.有症状的II型副舟骨的影像学表现。
Australas Radiol. 2004 Jun;48(2):267-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01286.x.
8
Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular.有症状的副舟骨手术治疗的临床结果
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 Jan;25(1):27-30. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500106.
9
The accessory tarsal scaphoid; clinical features and treatment.副舟骨;临床特征与治疗
Acta Orthop Scand. 1953;23(2):142-51. doi: 10.3109/17453675308991207.
10
The relationship between the tibialis posterior tendon and the accessory navicular.胫后肌腱与副舟骨之间的关系。
Ann Anat. 2000 Jan;182(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/s0940-9602(00)80130-2.