Suppr超能文献

山羊电解质测量:两种血气分析仪的比较及对预分析血样准备对测量结果的影响评估。

Electrolyte measurement in goats: Comparison of 2 blood gas analyzers and evaluation of the preanalytical blood sample preparation on measurement results.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere. 2020 Jun;48(3):148-155. doi: 10.1055/a-1161-7720. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

  1. To evaluate agreement for electrolyte measurements in goats between a handheld point-of-care analyzer (Abaxis VetScan i-STAT 1) (POC) and a benchtop blood gas analyzer (Opti CCA-TS2) (VBG) and 2) to evaluate effect of sample type on electrolytes values reported by both analyzers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 21 hospitalized caprine patients and 9 healthy research goats, blood samples were collected into heparin-containing tubes (Sodium Heparin 33 IU/2 ml) (TUBE) and a heparinized syringe (Sodium Heparin 430 IU/ml) (SYRINGE). Samples were analyzed using a POC analyzer as well as VBG. Analyzer results were compared using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson correlation. Comparison between samples was performed using repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS

Between analyzers, TUBE yielded a bias (95 % limits of agreement) of 0.07 mmol/l (-4.37 to 4.52) for sodium, while SYRINGE yielded a bias of -6.13 mmol/l (-11.04 to -1.22). Comparison of potassium yielded a bias of 0.09 mmol/l (-0.5 to 0.67) and 0.08 mmol/l (-0.4 to 0.56) for TUBE and SYRINGE, respectively. Comparison of ionized calcium showed a bias of 0.05 mmol/l (0.01-0.1) and -0.02 mmol/l (-0.18 to 0.14) for TUBE and SYRINGE, respectively. Between sample types, the POC yielded a bias of 5.13 mmol/l (0.18-10.09) for sodium, 0.04 mmol/l (-0.12 to 0.2) for potassium, and 0.40 mmol/l (0.12-0.68) for ionized calcium.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The POC exhibited clinically negligible bias for electrolyte analysis as compared to VBG. Ionized calcium concentrations were lower in self-prepared heparinized syringes than in heparin-containing tubes, suggesting an effect of heparin concentration on ionized calcium.

摘要

目的

1)评估手持式即时检测分析仪(Abaxis VetScan i-STAT 1)(POC)和台式血气分析仪(Opti CCA-TS2)(VBG)在山羊电解质测量方面的一致性,2)评估样本类型对两种分析仪报告的电解质值的影响。

材料与方法

在 21 例住院山羊患者和 9 只健康研究山羊中,采集肝素管(肝素钠 33 IU/2 ml)(TUBE)和肝素化注射器(肝素钠 430 IU/ml)(SYRINGE)中的血液样本。使用 POC 分析仪和 VBG 对样本进行分析。使用 Bland-Altman 分析和 Pearson 相关性比较分析仪结果。使用重复测量方差分析比较样本之间的差异。

结果

在两种分析仪之间,TUBE 产生的钠偏倚(95%一致性界限)为 0.07mmol/l(-4.37 至 4.52),而 SYRINGE 产生的偏倚为-6.13mmol/l(-11.04 至-1.22)。钾的比较结果为 TUBE 和 SYRINGE 的偏倚分别为 0.09mmol/l(-0.5 至 0.67)和 0.08mmol/l(-0.4 至 0.56)。离子钙的比较结果为 TUBE 和 SYRINGE 的偏倚分别为 0.05mmol/l(0.01-0.1)和-0.02mmol/l(-0.18 至 0.14)。在样本类型之间,POC 产生的钠偏倚为 5.13mmol/l(0.18-10.09),钾偏倚为 0.04mmol/l(-0.12 至 0.2),离子钙偏倚为 0.40mmol/l(0.12-0.68)。

结论和临床相关性

与 VBG 相比,POC 在电解质分析方面表现出临床可忽略的偏差。与肝素管相比,自制肝素化注射器中的离子钙浓度较低,提示肝素浓度对离子钙有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验