Suppr超能文献

在健康成年猫群体中比较即时检测 NOVA CCX 血气分析仪与实验室分析仪。

Comparison of point-of-care NOVA CCX blood gas analyzer to laboratory analyzer in a population of healthy adult cats.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois, 1008 W Hazelwood Drive, Urbana, Illinois, 61802, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2022 Mar;32(2):173-180. doi: 10.1111/vec.13155. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the level of agreement of measurement of analytes (sodium, chloride, potassium, urea nitrogen [UN], creatinine, glucose) in a population of healthy adult cats between the point-of-care (POC) analyzer and laboratory analyzer. To establish reference intervals for the POC analyzer in healthy adult cats.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Fifty-five cats were screened. Seven cats were excluded due to aggression that prohibited phlebotomy, and 1 cat was excluded due to prolonged restraint; 47 cats were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In this patient population, reference intervals for the POC analyzer were calculated: sodium 145-157 mmol/L; chloride 116-124 mmol/L; potassium 3.4-5.5 mmol/L; UN 5.71-13.9 mmol/L (16-39 mg/dl); creatinine 74.3-189.2 mmol/L (0.84-2.14 mg/dl); and glucose 4-11.8 mmol/L (72-213 mg/dl). Comparison between the POC analyzer and laboratory analyzer using the Bland-Altman method was performed. The bias for each analyte is as follows: sodium 1.55 mmol/L; chloride 0.99 mmol/L; potassium 0.21 mmol/L; UN -0.25 mmol/L (-0.7 mg/dl); creatinine 9.73 mmol/L (0.11 mg/dl); and glucose 0.5 mmol/L (9.79 mg/dl).

CONCLUSIONS

Reference intervals for each analyte were similar to other chemistry analyzers. There was no significant difference between the POC and laboratory analyzers in analysis of UN, with a statistically significant difference observed with sodium, potassium, chloride, creatinine, and glucose. However, the values are likely not sufficiently different to alter initial clinical decisions regarding patient care.

摘要

目的

比较健康成年猫群体中即时检测(POC)分析仪与实验室分析仪检测分析物(钠、氯、钾、尿素氮[UN]、肌酐、葡萄糖)的一致性水平。为健康成年猫的 POC 分析仪建立参考区间。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

设置

大学教学医院。

动物

筛选了 55 只猫。由于采血时的攻击性而无法进行静脉切开术,有 7 只猫被排除在外,由于长时间的约束,有 1 只猫被排除在外;最终有 47 只猫被纳入研究。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在该患者人群中,计算了 POC 分析仪的参考区间:钠 145-157mmol/L;氯 116-124mmol/L;钾 3.4-5.5mmol/L;UN 5.71-13.9mmol/L(16-39mg/dl);肌酐 74.3-189.2mmol/L(0.84-2.14mg/dl);葡萄糖 4-11.8mmol/L(72-213mg/dl)。使用 Bland-Altman 法比较 POC 分析仪和实验室分析仪。每个分析物的偏差如下:钠 1.55mmol/L;氯 0.99mmol/L;钾 0.21mmol/L;UN -0.25mmol/L(-0.7mg/dl);肌酐 9.73mmol/L(0.11mg/dl);葡萄糖 0.5mmol/L(9.79mg/dl)。

结论

每个分析物的参考区间与其他化学分析仪相似。POC 分析仪和实验室分析仪在分析 UN 时无显著差异,钠、钾、氯、肌酐和葡萄糖则有统计学显著差异。然而,这些差异值可能不足以改变患者治疗的初始临床决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验