Department of Physical Therapy/Motion Analysis Center, Central Michigan University, United States.
Department of Physical Therapy/Motion Analysis Center, Central Michigan University, United States.
Gait Posture. 2020 Jul;80:260-267. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
Reaction time task performance using electromyography (EMG) has been widely studied in the evaluation of motor responses. However, specific testing conditions with tray usage and the reliability of the bilateral trunk muscle reactions have not been proven.
Are there internal consistencies of the reaction times for a particular condition, such as a handheld task, among the examiners? Is there a delayed reaction time on the dominant abdominal muscle in response to a treadmill-induced slip perturbation while holding or not holding a tray?
One hundred and nineteen right upper and lower limb dominant individuals (71 female and 48 male subjects) were exposed to a treadmill-induced slip perturbation (0.24 m/s velocity for 1.2 cm) for 0.10 s in standing. The EMG electrodes were placed on both sides of the rectus abdominis (RA) and erector spinae (ES) muscles. The reliability of the test was established by using Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and the standard error of measurements.
The results for holding a tray indicated a high degree of consistency based on Cronbach's alpha for the left RA (0.79), right RA (0.86), left ES (0.82), and right ES (0.73) muscles. However, there was a significant reaction time difference among trunk muscles (F = 10.58, p = 0.002) while not holding a tray. The post-hoc results indicated that the right RA muscle was delayed more than the bilateral ES muscles, although there was no significant difference with the left RA muscle.
Overall, the EMG analyses for the reaction times were highly consistent with and without tray usage. The reaction times of the dominant abdominal muscles were delayed while not holding a tray. Given the high reliability, compensatory strategies by trunk dominance might be considered with a tray usage task.
使用肌电图(EMG)进行反应时间任务表现已广泛应用于运动反应评估。然而,对于使用托盘的特定测试条件以及双侧躯干肌肉反应的可靠性尚未得到证实。
在特定条件下(例如手持任务),不同检查者之间的反应时间是否具有内部一致性?在手持或不手持托盘的情况下,对跑步机引起的滑动扰动的反应中,优势侧腹肌的反应时间是否会延迟?
119 名右上肢和下肢优势个体(71 名女性和 48 名男性)在站立位接受跑步机引起的滑动扰动(速度为 0.24m/s,持续 1.2cm)0.10s。在双侧腹直肌(RA)和竖脊肌(ES)肌肉上放置 EMG 电极。使用 Cronbach's alpha、组内相关系数(ICC)和测量标准误差来确定测试的可靠性。
在手持托盘的情况下,根据左侧 RA(0.79)、右侧 RA(0.86)、左侧 ES(0.82)和右侧 ES(0.73)肌肉的 Cronbach's alpha 分析,结果表明具有高度一致性。然而,在不持托盘的情况下,躯干肌肉的反应时间存在显著差异(F=10.58,p=0.002)。事后检验结果表明,右侧 RA 肌肉的反应时间延迟大于双侧 ES 肌肉,尽管与左侧 RA 肌肉没有显著差异。
总体而言,在使用和不使用托盘的情况下,EMG 分析对反应时间的一致性都很高。在不持托盘的情况下,优势侧腹肌的反应时间会延迟。鉴于高度的可靠性,在使用托盘任务时可能需要考虑躯干优势的代偿策略。