Suppr超能文献

有无慢性下腰痛受试者在滑移动作后使用托盘时的踝关节反应时间。

Ankle reaction times with tray usage following a slip perturbation between subjects with and without chronic low back pain.

机构信息

Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Indiana Wesleyan University, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Medical College of Hallym University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gait Posture. 2022 Sep;97:196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.07.260. Epub 2022 Aug 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abnormal stepping strategies have been associated with handheld tasks in subjects with chronic low back pain (LBP). However, the dominant ankle reactions of subjects with LBP remain unclear following a perturbation during handheld tasks.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are there differences in the reaction times of the ankle muscles during handheld tasks between subjects with and without LBP following a treadmill-induced slip perturbation?

METHODS

Thirty-seven right limb dominant subjects with LBP and 37 subjects without LBP participated in the study. Each subject was introduced to a slip perturbation (1.37 m/sec velocity for 8.22 cm) with and without a handheld tray in random order. Subjects were allowed to recover by stepping forward for a 0.12 s duration while bilateral tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GA) muscle reaction times were measured by electromyography (EMG).

RESULTS

The EMG results indicated that the groups demonstrated significant interactions on the limb sides and muscles (F = 4.86, p = 0.03). The dominant TA reaction time was significantly faster in the LBP group (t = 2.14, p = 0.03) while holding a tray.

SIGNIFICANCE

The LBP group demonstrated faster reaction times on the dominant TA muscles during perturbations. Clinicians need to consider dominance-dependent compensatory ankle dorsiflexion strategies in LBP patients to help enhance dynamic balance and control.

摘要

背景

在慢性下背痛(LBP)患者进行手持任务时,异常的迈步策略与手持任务有关。然而,在手持任务中受到干扰后,LBP 患者的主导踝关节反应仍不清楚。

研究问题

在手持任务中,LBP 患者和无 LBP 患者在跑步机诱发的滑倒干扰后,踝关节肌肉的反应时间是否存在差异?

方法

37 名右肢优势的 LBP 患者和 37 名无 LBP 患者参与了研究。每个患者以随机顺序接受无托盘和有托盘的滑倒干扰(速度为 1.37m/s,距离为 8.22cm)。当患者被允许向前迈出 0.12 秒以恢复时,通过肌电图(EMG)测量双侧胫骨前肌(TA)和腓肠肌(GA)肌肉的反应时间。

结果

EMG 结果表明,组间在肢体侧和肌肉上存在显著的相互作用(F=4.86,p=0.03)。在持托盘时,LBP 组的主导 TA 反应时间明显更快(t=2.14,p=0.03)。

意义

LBP 组在受到干扰时,主导 TA 肌肉的反应时间更快。临床医生需要考虑 LBP 患者中依赖优势的补偿性踝关节背屈策略,以帮助增强动态平衡和控制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验