Department of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Molecules. 2020 Jun 17;25(12):2797. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122797.
Biocomposites can be both environmentally and economically beneficial: during their life cycle they generally use and generate less petroleum-based carbon, and when produced from the byproduct of another industry or recycled back to the manufacturing process, they will bring additional economic benefits through contributing to a circular economy. Here we investigate and compare the environmental performance of a biocomposite composed of a soybean oil-based resin (epoxidized sucrose soyate) and flax-based reinforcement using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. We evaluate the main environmental impacts that are generated during the production of the bio-based resin used in the biocomposite, as well as the biocomposite itself. We compare the life cycle impacts of the proposed biocomposite to a functionally similar petroleum-based resin and flax fiber reinforced composite, to identify tradeoffs between the environmental performance of the two products. We demonstrate that the bio-based resin (epoxidized sucrose soyate) compared to a conventional (bisphenol A-based) resin shows lower negative environmental impacts in most studied categories. When comparing the biocomposite to the fossil fuel derived composite, it is demonstrated that using epoxidized sucrose soyate versus a bisphenol A (BPA)-based epoxy resin can improve the environmental performance of the composite in most categories except eutrophication and ozone layer depletion. For future designs, considering an alternative cross-linker to facilitate the bond between the bio-based resin and the flax fiber, may help improve the overall environmental performance of the biocomposite. An uncertainty analysis was also performed to evaluate the effect of variation in LCA model inputs on the environmental results for both the biocomposite and composite. The findings show a better overall carbon footprint for the biocomposite compared to the BPA-based composite at almost all times, demonstrating a good potential for marketability especially in the presence of incentives or regulations that address reducing the carbon intensity of products. This analysis allowed us to pinpoint hotspots in the biocomposite's supply chain and recommend future modifications to improve the product's sustainability.
在其生命周期内,它们通常使用和产生更少的基于石油的碳,并且当它们由另一个行业的副产品或回收回制造过程中生产时,它们将通过为循环经济做出贡献带来额外的经济效益。在这里,我们使用生命周期评估 (LCA) 方法研究和比较了由基于大豆油的树脂(环氧蔗糖大豆)和基于亚麻的增强材料组成的生物复合材料的环境性能。我们评估了在生物基树脂生产过程中产生的主要环境影响,以及生物复合材料本身。我们将所提出的生物复合材料的生命周期影响与功能相似的基于石油的树脂和亚麻纤维增强复合材料进行了比较,以确定两种产品的环境性能之间的权衡。我们证明,与传统的(双酚 A 基)树脂相比,生物基树脂(环氧蔗糖大豆)在大多数研究类别中显示出较低的负面环境影响。当将生物复合材料与源自化石燃料的复合材料进行比较时,证明与双酚 A(BPA)基环氧树脂相比,使用环氧蔗糖大豆可以提高复合材料在大多数类别中的环境性能,除了富营养化和臭氧消耗。对于未来的设计,考虑使用替代的交联剂来促进生物基树脂和亚麻纤维之间的结合,可能有助于提高生物复合材料的整体环境性能。还进行了不确定性分析,以评估 LCA 模型输入的变化对生物复合材料和复合材料的环境结果的影响。研究结果表明,在几乎所有情况下,与基于 BPA 的复合材料相比,生物复合材料的整体碳足迹更好,尤其是在存在针对降低产品碳强度的激励措施或法规的情况下,具有很好的市场潜力。这项分析使我们能够确定生物复合材料供应链中的热点,并建议未来进行修改以提高产品的可持续性。