Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7A 4K9, Canada.
Alberta Environment and Parks, Operations Division - Resource Management, Grande Prarie, Alberta, T8V 6J4, Canada.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 1;269:110800. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110800. Epub 2020 May 22.
Borrow pits, dug by industry to provide substrate for infrastructure such as roads and well sites, are prevalent throughout the boreal forest of western Canada yet little is known about their use by wildlife. During field surveys in Rainbow Lake, Alberta, we found that beavers (Castor canadensis) used inundated borrow pits extensively for foraging and over wintering, suggesting that borrow pits increase beaver populations above their natural carrying capacity in industrial landscapes. We visited a random sample of 90 borrow pits in the field and categorized them as having active beaver lodges with caches (n = 16), inactive lodges (n = 13), cutting (n = 29), no activity (n = 13), or as not inundated or not a borrow pit (n = 19). We then used this sample to model where beavers established lodges versus where they were inactive or were only cutting. We found that borrow pits with active lodges had unique characteristics from other pits in our sample and were closer to streams, marshes, and swamps and had greater vegetation concealment from roads. These models can be used by managers to develop methods for increasing or decreasing the abundance of beavers living at borrow pits. Wildlife managers might want to use borrow pits to increase beaver abundance because of the positive effects beavers can have on ecosystems and because beavers are an important source of food for boreal carnivores. For example, we found that wolverines (Gulo gulo) used borrow pits as hunting grounds for beavers and one wolverine denned within a beaver lodge at a borrow pit. Conversely, managers might want to reduce beaver populations living at borrow pits because of the damage that beavers can cause to infrastructure and because subsidized beaver populations might alter predator-prey dynamics. To accomplish this, we suggest reducing available vegetation around borrow pits, isolating new borrow pits from natural beaver habitats, digging borrow pits where there is less chance of having surface water, filling in borrow pits with substrate, or not creating borrow pits and using a centralized gravel pit or mine for substrate.
借土坑是工业部门为了给道路和井场等基础设施提供基底而挖掘的,在加拿大西部的北方森林中非常普遍,但野生动物对其的利用情况却知之甚少。在艾伯塔省彩虹湖的实地调查中,我们发现海狸(Castor canadensis)广泛地利用淹没的借土坑觅食和越冬,这表明借土坑使工业景观中海狸的数量超过了其自然承载能力。我们随机访问了 90 个借土坑,并将其分为有海狸窝和贮藏物的活跃窝点(n=16)、不活跃窝点(n=13)、砍伐区(n=29)、无活动区(n=13)或未被淹没或非借土坑区(n=19)。然后,我们利用这个样本模型来确定海狸建立窝点的位置,以及它们不活跃或仅在砍伐的位置。我们发现,有活跃窝点的借土坑与样本中的其他借土坑有独特的特征,它们更靠近溪流、沼泽和沼泽地,并且从道路上的植被隐蔽性更好。这些模型可被管理者用于制定增加或减少借土坑中海狸数量的方法。野生动物管理者可能希望利用借土坑来增加海狸的数量,因为海狸对生态系统有积极的影响,而且海狸是北方肉食动物的重要食物来源。例如,我们发现狼獾(Gulo gulo)利用借土坑作为猎捕海狸的狩猎场,并且在一个借土坑的海狸窝中发现了一个狼獾巢穴。相反,管理者可能希望减少借土坑中海狸的数量,因为海狸可能会对基础设施造成破坏,并且补贴的海狸种群可能会改变捕食者-猎物的动态。为了实现这一目标,我们建议减少借土坑周围的可用植被,将新的借土坑与自然海狸栖息地隔离开来,在地表水可能性较小的地方挖掘借土坑,用基底填充借土坑,或者不挖掘借土坑,使用集中的砾石坑或矿山作为基底。