• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于欧洲医院药剂科肠外药物标签强化方法的调查。

A survey about label enhancement methods for parenteral medication in European hospital pharmacies.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025, AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Unit of Pharmacotherapy, Epidemiology & Pharmacoeconomics (PTE2), Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;76(11):1567-1571. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02916-x. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-020-02916-x
PMID:32562003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7560909/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Unclear labeling has been recognized as an important cause of look-alike medication errors. Little is known about which labeling practices are currently used in European hospitals. The aim of this article is to obtain an overview of the labeling practices for parenteral medications, in relation to national guidelines, in the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted using the Qualtrics® software. The survey was distributed to hospital pharmacists in the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK. The results were downloaded from Qualtrics and exported to Microsoft Excel. Data were categorized into groups and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

In total, 104 responses were received. The response rate was 63% (n = 48) in the Netherlands and 11% (n = 41) for Germany; for the UK, 15 responses were received. In general almost 90% of the respondents followed the National guidelines concerning labeling of pharmacy-prepared parenteral products. The use of label enhancement techniques was relatively low in all countries. On average, the use of "Tall Man" lettering was 19%, the use of color coding was 29%, and the use of a barcode on the label was 27%.

CONCLUSION

Label-enhancement methods for parenteral medication in hospital pharmacies do not seem to be widely implemented and acknowledged in European hospitals, but response rates were limited for two countries. Greater standardization in conjunction with research for evidence-based enhancement techniques is needed to guide improvement in labeling practices across Europe.

摘要

目的

标签不清晰已被认为是造成类似药物错误的一个重要原因。目前,人们对欧洲医院使用的哪些标签标注做法知之甚少。本文旨在概述荷兰、德国和英国的医院在标签标注方面的实践,涉及国家指南。

方法

使用 Qualtrics®软件进行在线调查。该调查分发给荷兰、德国和英国的医院药剂师。从 Qualtrics 下载结果并导出到 Microsoft Excel。将数据分类并进行描述性分析。

结果

共收到 104 份回复。荷兰的回复率为 63%(n=48),德国为 11%(n=41);英国收到了 15 份回复。总体而言,近 90%的受访者遵循了国家关于药剂科制备的肠外产品标签的指南。在所有国家,标签增强技术的使用都相对较低。平均而言,“Tall Man”字体的使用比例为 19%,颜色编码的使用比例为 29%,标签上条形码的使用比例为 27%。

结论

医院药剂科的肠外药物标签增强方法似乎在欧洲医院并未得到广泛实施和认可,但有两个国家的回复率有限。需要更大程度的标准化,并结合基于证据的增强技术研究,以指导欧洲各地的标签标注实践的改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b9/7560909/c4b775141a51/228_2020_2916_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b9/7560909/9d4c0ca58bb2/228_2020_2916_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b9/7560909/c4b775141a51/228_2020_2916_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b9/7560909/9d4c0ca58bb2/228_2020_2916_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/91b9/7560909/c4b775141a51/228_2020_2916_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A survey about label enhancement methods for parenteral medication in European hospital pharmacies.一项关于欧洲医院药剂科肠外药物标签强化方法的调查。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;76(11):1567-1571. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-02916-x. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels.关于避免标签相似错误的策略的系统文献回顾。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;74(8):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2471-z. Epub 2018 May 12.
3
Development of a list of look-alike drug names with recommended tall man letters.制定一份带有推荐大写字母的相似药品名称清单。
Farm Hosp. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31.
4
A comparison of the effects of different typographical methods on the recognizability of printed drug names.不同排版方法对印刷药品名称可识别性影响的比较。
Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0156-9.
5
Parenteral nutrition in hospital pharmacies.医院药房中的肠外营养
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):664-74. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2015-0104.
6
ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Prescribing and transcribing-2016.美国卫生系统药师协会医院药学实践全国性调查:处方开具与转录 - 2016年
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Sep 1;74(17):1336-1352. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170228. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
7
Tall Man lettering and potential prescription errors: a time series analysis of 42 children's hospitals in the USA over 9 years.醒目大字书写与潜在处方错误:对美国42家儿童医院9年期间的时间序列分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):233-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004562. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: monitoring and patient education--2003.美国卫生系统药师协会医院药学实践全国性调查:监测与患者教育——2003年
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Mar 1;61(5):457-71. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.5.457.
9
National survey of quality assurance activities for pharmacy-compounded sterile preparations.全国药房配制无菌制剂质量保证活动调查。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Dec 15;60(24):2567-76. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.24.2567.
10
ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: Dispensing and administration-2017.美国卫生系统药师协会医院药房实践全国性调查:调配与给药 - 2017年
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Aug 15;75(16):1203-1226. doi: 10.2146/ajhp180151. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
EAHP European Statements Survey 2017, focusing on sections 2 (Selection, Procurement and Distribution), 5 (Patient Safety and Quality Assurance) and 6 (Education and Research).2017年欧洲医院药剂师协会(EAHP)声明调查,重点关注第2部分(选择、采购与分发)、第5部分(患者安全与质量保证)以及第6部分(教育与研究)。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Sep;25(5):237-244. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001659. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of microbial contamination of parenteral medication prepared in a clinical versus pharmacy environment.临床环境与药剂环境制备的肠外药物的微生物污染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 May;75(5):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02631-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels.
关于避免标签相似错误的策略的系统文献回顾。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;74(8):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2471-z. Epub 2018 May 12.
4
Oncology nurses' beliefs and attitudes towards the double-check of chemotherapy medications: a cross-sectional survey study.肿瘤专科护士对化疗药物双重核对的信念与态度:一项横断面调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 17;18(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2937-9.
5
Medication double-checking procedures in clinical practice: a cross-sectional survey of oncology nurses' experiences.临床实践中的用药双重核对程序:一项关于肿瘤护理人员经验的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 13;6(6):e011394. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011394.
6
Tall Man lettering and potential prescription errors: a time series analysis of 42 children's hospitals in the USA over 9 years.醒目大字书写与潜在处方错误:对美国42家儿童医院9年期间的时间序列分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):233-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004562. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Interventions to reduce nurses' medication administration errors in inpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以减少住院环境中护士的给药错误:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Jan;53:342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
A national survey of inpatient medication systems in English NHS hospitals.一项针对英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院住院用药系统的全国性调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 27;14:93. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-93.
9
Causes of medication administration errors in hospitals: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.医院给药错误的原因:定量和定性证据的系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;36(11):1045-67. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0090-2.
10
Does colour-coded labelling reduce the risk of medication errors?颜色编码标签能否降低用药错误的风险?
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2009 Mar;62(2):154-6. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v62i2.446.