ISGlobal, Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique; Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
ISGlobal, Hospital Clinic-Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça, Maputo, Mozambique; Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jul;8(7):e965-e972. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30236-9.
Although an increasing number of pregnant women in resource-limited areas deliver in health-care facilities, maternal mortality remains high in these settings. Inadequate diagnosis and management of common life-threatening conditions is an important determinant of maternal mortality. We analysed the clinicopathological discrepancies in a series of maternal deaths from Mozambique and assessed changes over 10 years in the diagnostic process. We aimed to provide data on clinical diagnostic accuracy to be used for improving quality of care and reducing maternal mortality.
We did a retrospective analysis of clinicopathological discrepancies in 91 maternal deaths occurring from Nov 1, 2013, to March 31, 2015 (17 month-long period), at a tertiary-level hospital in Mozambique, using complete diagnostic autopsies as the gold standard to ascertain cause of death. We estimated the performance of the clinical diagnosis and classified clinicopathological discrepancies as major and minor errors. We compared the findings of this analysis with those of a similar study done in the same setting 10 years earlier.
We identified a clinicopathological discrepancy in 35 (38%) of 91 women. All diagnostic errors observed were classified as major discrepancies. The sensitivity of the clinical diagnosis for puerperal infections was 17% and the positive predictive value was 50%. The sensitivity for non-obstetric infections was 48%. The sensitivity for eclampsia was 100% but the positive predictive value was 33%. Over the 10-year period, the performance of clinical diagnosis did not improve, and worsened for some diagnoses, such as puerperal infection.
Decreasing maternal mortality requires improvement of the pre-mortem diagnostic process and avoidance of clinical errors by refining clinical skills and increasing the availability and quality of diagnostic tests. Comparison of post-mortem information with clinical diagnosis will help monitor the reduction of clinical errors and thus improve the quality of care.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Instituto de Salud Carlos III.
尽管越来越多的资源有限地区的孕妇选择在医疗机构分娩,但这些地区的孕产妇死亡率仍然很高。不能充分诊断和处理常见的危及生命的病症是导致孕产妇死亡的一个重要因素。我们分析了莫桑比克一系列孕产妇死亡的临床病理差异,并评估了 10 年来诊断过程的变化。我们旨在提供有关临床诊断准确性的数据,用于改善护理质量和降低孕产妇死亡率。
我们对 2013 年 11 月 1 日至 2015 年 3 月 31 日期间在莫桑比克一家三级医院发生的 91 例孕产妇死亡病例进行了回顾性临床病理差异分析,使用完整的诊断性尸检作为金标准来确定死亡原因。我们估计了临床诊断的表现,并将临床病理差异分类为主要和次要错误。我们将这项分析的结果与 10 年前在同一地点进行的一项类似研究进行了比较。
我们发现 91 名妇女中有 35 名(38%)存在临床病理差异。所有观察到的诊断错误均被归类为主要差异。临床诊断产后感染的敏感性为 17%,阳性预测值为 50%。非产科感染的敏感性为 48%。子痫的敏感性为 100%,但阳性预测值为 33%。在 10 年期间,临床诊断的性能没有改善,对于一些诊断,如产后感染,甚至恶化了。
降低孕产妇死亡率需要改善产前诊断过程,通过提高临床技能并增加诊断检测的可用性和质量来避免临床错误。将死后信息与临床诊断进行比较将有助于监测临床错误的减少,从而提高护理质量。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会和西班牙卡洛斯三世卫生研究所。