• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用欧洲自然驾驶数据评估红灯停车时的次要任务参与情况。

Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.

机构信息

Technische Universität Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany.

Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.007
PMID:32563398
Abstract

PROBLEM

Some evidence exists that drivers choose to engage in secondary tasks when the driving demand is low (e.g., when the car is stopped). While such a behavior might generally be considered as rather safe, it could be argued that the associated diversion of attention away from the road still leads to a reduction of situational awareness, which might increase collision risk once the car regains motion. This is especially relevant for texting, which is associated with considerable eyes-off-the-road-time. Nonetheless, it seems that previous research has barely addressed the actual engagement in secondary tasks while waiting at a red light (as compared to just addressing the tasks' mere prevalence).

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated secondary task engagement while stopped at a red light using European naturalistic driving data collected through the UDRIVE project. Attention was given to the whole engagement process, including simple prevalence and the tasks' relation (in terms of start/end) to the red light period. Moreover, given that texting is one of the most problematic forms of distraction, it was characterized in more detail regarding glance behavior.

METHOD

Videos of 804 red light episodes from 159 drivers were annotated. Glance behavior was also coded for a sub-set of 75 texting events and their matched baselines. Results, conclusions and practical applications: Drivers engaged in at least one secondary task across almost half of the annotated red light episodes. Drivers who texted while stopped spent most of the time looking at their cell phone. Consequently, drivers might not have been prepared for potentially unexpected events once the light turned green. Further, drivers concluded texting a considerable number of times well after the red light period, which has potential implications for traffic safety.

摘要

问题

有证据表明,当驾驶需求较低(例如,汽车停止时)时,驾驶员会选择从事次要任务。虽然这种行为通常被认为是相当安全的,但可以说,注意力从道路上转移仍然会导致情境意识降低,一旦汽车恢复运动,碰撞风险可能会增加。这对于发短信尤其相关,因为发短信会导致相当长的视线离开道路的时间。尽管如此,似乎以前的研究几乎没有涉及在红灯等待时实际从事次要任务(与仅仅解决任务的普遍存在相比)。

目的

本研究使用 UDRIVE 项目收集的欧洲自然驾驶数据,调查了红灯停车时从事次要任务的情况。关注的是整个参与过程,包括简单的流行率以及任务与红灯期的关系(就开始/结束而言)。此外,由于发短信是最具问题的分心形式之一,因此对其注视行为进行了更详细的描述。

方法

对 159 名驾驶员的 804 个红灯事件视频进行了注释。还对 75 个短信事件及其匹配的基线的注视行为进行了编码。结果、结论和实际应用:驾驶员在几乎一半的注释红灯事件中从事了至少一项次要任务。在红灯停车时发短信的驾驶员大部分时间都在看手机。因此,一旦绿灯亮起,驾驶员可能没有为潜在的意外事件做好准备。此外,驾驶员在红灯期结束后相当多次数地结束了发短信,这对交通安全有潜在影响。

相似文献

1
Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.利用欧洲自然驾驶数据评估红灯停车时的次要任务参与情况。
J Safety Res. 2020 Jun;73:235-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
2
Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.使用SHRP 2自然驾驶数据评估驾驶员在进行不同次要任务时的速度选择。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 6.
3
Texting at the light and other forms of device distraction behind the wheel.在信号灯前发短信以及开车时其他形式的设备干扰行为。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 26;15:968. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2343-8.
4
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
5
Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.驾驶环境会影响驾驶员参与视觉手动电话任务的决策:来自自然驾驶研究的证据。
J Safety Res. 2015 Jun;53:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.青少年分心驾驶行为:流行率和预测因素。
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:157-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
7
The prevalence of distraction among passenger vehicle drivers: a roadside observational approach.乘用车驾驶员分心行为的流行率:一种路边观察方法。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(2):140-6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.916797. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
Real-world effects of using a phone while driving on lateral and longitudinal control of vehicles.驾驶时使用手机对车辆横向和纵向控制的实际影响。
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Drivers' phone use at red traffic lights: a roadside observation study comparing calls and visual-manual interactions.交通信号灯红灯时驾驶员使用手机情况:一项比较通话与视觉手动交互的路边观察研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
10
A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.城市道路环境中突发制动事件中基于语音和手持输入的事故风险比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165675.