University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9248; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
Department of Thoracic Surgery.
Acad Radiol. 2021 Jun;28(6):753-766. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Examine the accuracy of clinical non-small cell lung cancer staging and tumor length measurements, which are critical to prognosis and treatment planning.
Compare clinical and pathological staging and lengths using 10,320 2016 National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and 559 2010-2018 non-SEER single-institute surgically-treated cases, and analyze modifiable causes of disagreement.
The SEER clinical and pathological group-stages agree only 62.3% ± 0.9% over all stage categories. The lymph node N-stage agrees much better at 83.0% ± 1.0%, but the tumor length-location T-stage agrees only 57.7% ± 0.8% with approximately 29% of the cases having a greater pathology than clinical T-stage. Individual T-stage category agreements with respect to the number of pathology cases are Tis, T1a, T1b, T2a, T2b, T3, T4: 89.9% ± 10.0%; 78.7% ± 1.7%; 51.8% ± 1.9%; 46.1% ± 1.3%; 40.5% ± 3.1%; 44.1% ± 2.2%; 56.4% ± 4.7%, respectively. Most of the single-institute results statistically agree with SEER's. Excluding Tis cases, the mean difference in SEER tumor length is ∼1.18 ± 9.26 mm (confidence interval: 0.97-1.39 mm) with pathological lengths being longer than clinical lengths except for small tumors; the two measurements correlate well (Pearson-r >0.87, confidence interval: 0.86-0.87). Reasons for disagreement include the use of family-category descriptors (e.g., T1) instead of their subcategories (e.g., T1a and T1b), which worsens the T-stage agreement by over 15%. Disagreement is also associated with higher tumor grade, larger resected specimens, higher N-stage, patient age, and periodic biases in clinical and pathological tumor size measurements.
By including preliminary non-small cell lung cancer clinical stage values in their evaluation, diagnostic radiologists can improve the accuracy of staging and standardize tumor-size measurements, which improves patient care.
研究临床非小细胞肺癌分期和肿瘤长度测量的准确性,这对预后和治疗计划至关重要。
比较 10,320 例 2016 年国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)和 559 例 2010-2018 年非 SEER 单机构手术治疗病例的临床和病理分期及长度,并分析可修改的不一致原因。
SEER 临床和病理组分期在所有分期类别中的一致性仅为 62.3%±0.9%。淋巴结 N 分期的一致性要好得多,为 83.0%±1.0%,但肿瘤 T 分期的位置仅为 57.7%±0.8%,约 29%的病例病理 T 分期大于临床 T 分期。根据病理病例数,各 T 分期类别的一致性为Tis、T1a、T1b、T2a、T2b、T3、T4:89.9%±10.0%;78.7%±1.7%;51.8%±1.9%;46.1%±1.3%;40.5%±3.1%;44.1%±2.2%;56.4%±4.7%,分别。大多数单机构的结果与 SEER 的统计结果一致。排除Tis 病例后,SEER 肿瘤长度的平均差异约为 1.18±9.26mm(置信区间:0.97-1.39mm),病理长度长于临床长度,除了小肿瘤外;这两种测量方法相关性良好(Pearson-r>0.87,置信区间:0.86-0.87)。不一致的原因包括使用家族类别描述符(例如,T1)而不是其子类别(例如,T1a 和 T1b),这会使 T 分期的一致性恶化超过 15%。不一致也与肿瘤分级较高、切除标本较大、N 分期较高、患者年龄以及临床和病理肿瘤大小测量的周期性偏差有关。
诊断放射科医生在评估时纳入初步非小细胞肺癌临床分期值,可以提高分期的准确性,规范肿瘤大小测量,从而改善患者护理。