School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):458-466.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.111. Epub 2020 May 7.
Despite growing evidence of comparable outcomes in recipients of donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death donor lungs, donation after circulatory death allografts continue to be underused nationally. We examined predictors of nonuse.
All donors who donated at least 1 organ for transplantation between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry and stratified by donation type. The primary outcome of interest was use of pulmonary allografts. Organ disposition and refusal reasons were evaluated. Multivariable regression modeling was used to assess the relationship between donor factors and use.
A total of 15,458 donation after circulatory death donors met inclusion criteria. Of 30,916 lungs, 3.7% (1158) were used for transplantation and 72.8% were discarded primarily due to poor organ function. Consent was not requested in 8.4% of donation after circulatory death offers with donation after circulatory death being the leading reason (73.4%). Nonuse was associated with smoking history (P < .001), clinical infection with a blood source (12% vs 7.4%, P = .001), and lower PaO/FiO ratio (median 230 vs 423, P < .001). In multivariable regression, those with PaO/FiO ratio less than 250 were least likely to be transplanted (adjusted odds ratio, 0.03; P < .001), followed by cigarette use (0.28, P < .001), and donor age >50 (0.75, P = .031). Recent transplant era was associated with significantly increased use (adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; P < .001).
Nontransplantation of donation after circulatory death lungs was associated with potentially modifiable predonation factors, including organ procurement organizations' consenting behavior, and donor factors, including hypoxemia. Interventions to increase consent and standardize donation after circulatory death donor management, including selective use of ex vivo lung perfusion in the setting of hypoxemia, may increase use and the donor pool.
尽管在接受循环死亡供体和脑死亡供体供肺的受者中,有越来越多的证据表明其结果相当,但循环死亡供体的同种异体移植物在全国范围内仍未得到充分利用。我们研究了不使用的预测因素。
在美国器官共享网络登记处确定了 2005 年至 2019 年间至少捐献 1 个器官用于移植的所有供者,并按捐献类型进行分层。主要研究结果是肺同种异体移植物的使用情况。评估器官处理和拒绝原因。使用多变量回归模型评估供者因素与使用之间的关系。
共有 15458 名循环死亡供者符合纳入标准。在 30916 个肺中,3.7%(1158 个)用于移植,72.8%因器官功能不良而主要被丢弃。在 8.4%的循环死亡供者中未请求同意,而循环死亡是主要原因(73.4%)。未使用与吸烟史有关(P<0.001)、有血液来源的临床感染(12%比 7.4%,P=0.001)和较低的 PaO/FiO 比值(中位数 230 比 423,P<0.001)。多变量回归分析显示,PaO/FiO 比值小于 250 的患者最不可能进行移植(调整后优势比,0.03;P<0.001),其次是吸烟(0.28,P<0.001)和供者年龄>50 岁(0.75,P=0.031)。最近的移植时代与显著增加的使用相关(调整后优势比,2.28;P<0.001)。
循环死亡供肺未移植与潜在可改变的供前因素有关,包括器官获取组织的同意行为,以及供者因素,包括低氧血症。增加同意和规范循环死亡供者管理的干预措施,包括在低氧血症情况下选择性使用体外肺灌注,可能会增加使用和供者库。