Suppr超能文献

使用安非他命类兴奋剂使用障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍患者的动机。

Use Motives of Patients with Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Use Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

机构信息

Psychiatric Outpatient Department, Mental Health District Hospital Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany,

Department of Psychology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany,

出版信息

Eur Addict Res. 2020;26(4-5):254-262. doi: 10.1159/000508871. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a frequent comorbidity of amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) use disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The assumption that this patient group "self-medicate" suggests that there are different use motives for ATS addicted patients with and without ADHD.

OBJECTIVE

Our study investigates these potential differences in use motives.

METHODS

Within a mixed-method approach, we examined the use motives of adults with ATS use disorder with and without ADHD in the first and latest month of their use. For this purpose, we used the 12-item Amphetamine-Type Stimulants Motive Questionnaire (AMQ) and a mind mapping technique after verifying that these tools are applicable to adults with ADHD.

RESULTS

The mixed-method approach showed that enhancement motives were the most important motives in the first month of use (e.g., fun/kick/rush/desire, and curiosity/interest in the drug/appeal), and over time, the incidence of coping motives increased (e.g., repression and freeing the mind/not having to think/switching off). There were no differences between adults with and without ADHD in the AMQ data, while the qualitative data showed that adults with ADHD used ATS less often out of social motives. In particular, the results showed no differences in the coping dimension and, thus, did not suggest that self-medication is an important factor for patients with ADHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with and without ADHD show very similar motive patterns for ATS use. This indicates that ATS treatment programs addressing use motives do not necessarily have to be different for patients with and without ADHD.

摘要

简介

安非他命类兴奋剂(ATS)使用障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)经常共病。假设该患者群体“自我治疗”表明,ATS 成瘾患者和无 ADHD 的患者的使用动机不同。

目的

我们的研究调查了这些潜在的使用动机差异。

方法

在混合方法的基础上,我们检查了有和没有 ADHD 的 ATS 使用障碍成年人在使用的第一个月和最后一个月的使用动机。为此,我们使用了 12 项安非他命类兴奋剂动机问卷(AMQ)和思维导图技术,在验证这些工具适用于 ADHD 成年人之后。

结果

混合方法表明,增强动机是使用第一个月最重要的动机(例如,乐趣/刺激/兴奋/渴望和对药物/吸引力的好奇/兴趣),随着时间的推移,应对动机的发生率增加(例如,压抑和解放思想/不去想/关闭)。在 AMQ 数据中,有和没有 ADHD 的成年人之间没有差异,而定性数据表明,由于社交动机,患有 ADHD 的成年人使用 ATS 的频率较低。特别是,结果表明在应对维度上没有差异,因此,这并不表明自我治疗是 ADHD 患者的一个重要因素。

结论

有和没有 ADHD 的患者对 ATS 的使用表现出非常相似的动机模式。这表明,针对使用动机的 ATS 治疗方案不一定需要针对有和没有 ADHD 的患者有所不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验