Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Abteilung für Pneumologie, Fachklinik für Lungenerkrankungen Donaustauf, Donaustauf, Germany.
Respiration. 2020;99(6):521-542. doi: 10.1159/000509104. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
Against the background of the pandemic caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the German Respiratory Society has appointed experts to develop therapy strategies for COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Here we present key position statements including observations about the pathophysiology of (ARF). In terms of the pathophysiology of pulmonary infection with SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 can be divided into 3 phases. Pulmonary damage in advanced COVID-19 often differs from the known changes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Two types (type L and type H) are differentiated, corresponding to early- and late-stage lung damage. This differentiation should be taken into consideration in the respiratory support of ARF. The assessment of the extent of ARF should be based on arterial or capillary blood gas analysis under room air conditions, and it needs to include the calculation of oxygen supply (measured from the variables of oxygen saturation, hemoglobin level, the corrected values of Hüfner's factor, and cardiac output). Aerosols can cause transmission of infectious, virus-laden particles. Open systems or vented systems can increase the release of respirable particles. Procedures in which the invasive ventilation system must be opened and endotracheal intubation carried out are associated with an increased risk of infection. Personal protective equipment (PPE) should have top priority because fear of contagion should not be a primary reason for intubation. Based on the current knowledge, inhalation therapy, nasal high-flow therapy (NHF), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be performed without an increased risk of infection to staff if PPE is provided. A significant proportion of patients with ARF present with relevant hypoxemia, which often cannot be fully corrected, even with a high inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) under NHF. In this situation, the oxygen therapy can be escalated to CPAP or NIV when the criteria for endotracheal intubation are not met. In ARF, NIV should be carried out in an intensive care unit or a comparable setting by experienced staff. Under CPAP/NIV, a patient can deteriorate rapidly. For this reason, continuous monitoring and readiness for intubation are to be ensured at all times. If the ARF progresses under CPAP/NIV, intubation should be implemented without delay in patients who do not have a "do not intubate" order.
在由 SARS-CoV-2 病毒感染引起的大流行背景下,德国呼吸学会已任命专家制定 COVID-19 急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者的治疗策略。在这里,我们提出了关键的立场声明,包括对(ARF)病理生理学的观察。就 SARS-CoV-2 肺部感染的病理生理学而言,COVID-19 可分为 3 个阶段。晚期 COVID-19 的肺部损伤通常与急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的已知变化不同。区分了两种类型(L 型和 H 型),分别对应于早期和晚期的肺部损伤。在 ARF 的呼吸支持中应考虑这种分化。ARF 程度的评估应基于在空气条件下进行的动脉或毛细血管血气分析,并且需要包括氧供的计算(根据氧饱和度、血红蛋白水平、Hüfner 因子校正值和心输出量的变量来测量)。气溶胶会导致传染性、载有病毒的颗粒传播。开放系统或通风系统会增加可吸入颗粒的释放。必须打开侵入性通气系统并进行气管插管的程序与感染风险增加有关。个人防护设备(PPE)应优先考虑,因为对感染的恐惧不应成为插管的主要原因。根据目前的知识,如果提供个人防护设备,吸入治疗、鼻高流量治疗(NHF)、持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或无创通气(NIV)可在不增加工作人员感染风险的情况下进行。相当一部分 ARF 患者存在相关低氧血症,即使在 NHF 下给予高吸入氧分数(FiO2),也常常无法完全纠正。在这种情况下,当不符合气管插管标准时,可将氧疗升级为 CPAP 或 NIV。在 ARF 中,应由经验丰富的人员在重症监护病房或类似环境中进行 NIV。在 CPAP/NIV 下,患者可能会迅速恶化。因此,应始终确保连续监测并随时准备插管。如果 CPAP/NIV 下的 ARF 进展,应毫不拖延地对没有“不插管”医嘱的患者进行插管。