• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性围产期感染与宫内诊断性检测的循证风险:系统综述。

Acute Perinatal Infection and the Evidenced-Based Risk of Intrauterine Diagnostic Testing: A Structured Review.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary/Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada,

出版信息

Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(9):653-664. doi: 10.1159/000508042. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1159/000508042
PMID:32564035
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of perinatal infection from maternal exposure is increasing. The prevalence of acute maternal infections identifies cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, toxoplasmosis, and varicella as the most common organisms and in the order of frequency. Maternal informed consent and understanding is required before intrauterine testing for fetal infectious and possible genetic risk assessment.

METHODS

This structured review of the reproductive published literature focuses on the risks of amniocentesis and cordocentesis diagnostic procedure-related fetal loss rates and fetal vertical transmission (VT) rates from published infected pregnant cohorts.

RESULTS

The total postprocedure fetal loss rate for diagnostic amniocentesis procedures, in limited infectious cohorts, is 1.5% and does not appear to be increased compared to "noninfected" amniocentesis cohorts using an estimated background spontaneous fetal loss rate (no procedure) of 0.65%. The "pooled" unintended fetal loss rate is from small infected population cohorts, but can be used for counseling purposes. Postcordocentesis fetal loss risk, in an infected cohort, is not possible to estimate due to limited data. The "biological spontaneous fetal loss rate" risk with a perinatal infection (positive or negative fetal anomalies) and no diagnostic procedure before 20 weeks of gestation is reviewed. The risk of VT in acute infection cohorts as a result of the intra-amniotic diagnostic procedure is not found to be increased.

CONCLUSION

The unintended "fetal loss" rate after amniocentesis for perinatal infected cohorts is similar to that of noninfected cohorts, but the estimate is based on limited infected cohorts. There was no procedure-based risk of fetal VT in the infected cohorts, but identification of postprocedure maternal bleeding into the amniotic cavity increases the potential risk. Maternal knowledge translation and an informed consent process with risk-benefit maternal/fetal risk counseling are required prior to any diagnostic amniocentesis procedure.

摘要

背景

母婴暴露所致围产期感染的患病率正在上升。急性母体感染的患病率确定巨细胞病毒、细小病毒 B19、弓形虫病和水痘带状疱疹病毒为最常见的病原体,按频率顺序排列。在对胎儿进行宫内感染和可能的遗传风险评估之前,需要获得母体知情同意和理解。

方法

本研究对已发表的生殖文献进行了系统回顾,重点关注羊膜腔穿刺术和脐带穿刺术诊断性操作相关的胎儿丢失率以及来自已发表的感染孕妇队列的胎儿垂直传播 (VT) 率。

结果

在有限的感染队列中,诊断性羊膜腔穿刺术的总术后胎儿丢失率为 1.5%,与使用估计的背景自发性胎儿丢失率(无操作)为 0.65%的“非感染”羊膜腔穿刺术队列相比,似乎并未增加。“汇总”意外胎儿丢失率来自小的感染人群队列,但可用于咨询目的。由于数据有限,无法估计感染队列中脐带穿刺术后的胎儿丢失风险。回顾了围产期感染(阳性或阴性胎儿异常)且在妊娠 20 周前无诊断性操作时的“生物学自发性胎儿丢失”风险。在急性感染队列中,由于羊膜腔内诊断性操作而导致的 VT 风险并未增加。

结论

对于围产期感染队列,羊膜腔穿刺术后的意外“胎儿丢失”率与非感染队列相似,但估计值基于有限的感染队列。在感染队列中,没有因操作而导致胎儿 VT 的风险,但在羊膜腔内检测到术后母体出血会增加潜在风险。在进行任何羊膜腔穿刺术之前,需要对母体进行知识转化并进行知情同意过程,对母体/胎儿风险进行风险-效益比的咨询。

相似文献

1
Acute Perinatal Infection and the Evidenced-Based Risk of Intrauterine Diagnostic Testing: A Structured Review.急性围产期感染与宫内诊断性检测的循证风险:系统综述。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(9):653-664. doi: 10.1159/000508042. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
Prenatal Diagnosis Procedures and Techniques to Obtain a Diagnostic Fetal Specimen or Tissue: Maternal and Fetal Risks and Benefits.获取诊断性胎儿标本或组织的产前诊断程序和技术:母婴风险与益处
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Jul;37(7):656-668. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30205-X.
3
Feasibility of predicting the outcome of fetal infection with cytomegalovirus at the time of prenatal diagnosis.产前诊断时预测巨细胞病毒感染胎儿结局的可行性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):342.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.052. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
4
Amniocentesis羊膜穿刺术
5
Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: prevention, screening, and treatment.妊娠期弓形虫病:预防、筛查与治疗
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jan;35(1):78-81. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)31053-7.
6
Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal management of maternal-fetal congenital parvovirus B19 infection.母婴先天性细小病毒B19感染的产前诊断与围产期管理
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;46(4):417-22. doi: 10.1016/s1028-4559(08)60014-5.
7
Prevention and treatment of fetal cytomegalovirus infection with cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin: a multicenter study in Madrid.巨细胞病毒高效价免疫球蛋白预防和治疗胎儿巨细胞病毒感染:马德里的一项多中心研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;32(4):617-625. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1387890. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
8
Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in twin pregnancies.双胎妊娠先天性巨细胞病毒感染的产前诊断及结局
BJOG. 2006 Mar;113(3):295-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00854.x.
9
[Parvovirus B19 infection in pregnancy: a cause of non-immune hydrops fetalis].[孕期细小病毒B19感染:非免疫性胎儿水肿的一个病因]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Jan 2;143(1):3-7.
10
Outcome of pregnancies with vertical transmission of primary cytomegalovirus infection.原发性巨细胞病毒感染垂直传播的妊娠结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep;100(3):428-33. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02091-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Parvovirus B19 in Pregnancy-Do We Screen for Fifth Disease or Not?孕期感染细小病毒B19——我们是否要筛查传染性红斑?
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 16;14(12):1667. doi: 10.3390/life14121667.
2
An Overview of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy.妊娠期巨细胞病毒感染概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 7;12(10):2429. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102429.