Suppr超能文献

基于衰弱指标(缺陷积累法)衡量的强化生活方式干预对心血管疾病风险的影响是否存在差异?

Does the Impact of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Vary According to Frailty as Measured via Deficit Accumulation?

机构信息

Department of Mathematics, Winston-Salem State University, North Carolina.

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):339-345. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa153.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals are often counseled to use behavioral weight loss strategies to reduce risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We examined whether any benefits for CVD risk from weight loss intervention extend uniformly to individuals across a range of underlying health states.

METHODS

The time until first occurrence of a composite of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke, hospitalized angina, or CVD death was analyzed from 8 to 11 years of follow-up of 4,859 adults who were overweight or obese, aged 45-76 years with Type 2 diabetes. Individuals had been randomly assigned to either an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) or diabetes support and education (DSE). Participants were grouped by intervention assignment and a frailty index (FI) based on deficit accumulation, ordered from fewer (first tertile) to more (third tertile) deficits.

RESULTS

Baseline FI scores were unrelated to intervention-induced weight losses and increased physical activity. The relative effectiveness of ILI on CVD incidence was inversely related to baseline FI in a graded fashion (p = .01), with relative benefit (hazard ratio = 0.73 [95% CI 0.55,0.98]) for individuals in the first FI tertile to no benefit (hazard ratio = 1.15 [0.94,1.42]) among those in the third FI tertile. This graded relationship was not seen for individuals ordered by age tertile (p = .52), and was stronger among participants aged 45-59 years (three-way interaction p = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

In overweight/obese adults with diabetes, multidomain lifestyle interventions may be most effective in reducing CVD if administered before individuals have accrued many age-related health deficits. However, these exploratory analyses require confirmation by other studies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00017953.

摘要

背景

个体经常被建议采用行为性减重策略以降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险。我们研究了减重干预对 CVD 风险的益处是否会均匀地扩展到处于不同健康状态的个体。

方法

对 4859 名超重或肥胖、年龄 45-76 岁且患有 2 型糖尿病的成年人进行了 8-11 年的随访,分析了首次发生致命性和非致命性心肌梗死和中风、住院心绞痛或 CVD 死亡的复合终点的时间。个体被随机分配到强化生活方式干预(ILI)或糖尿病支持和教育(DSE)组。根据缺陷累积情况,根据脆弱性指数(FI)将参与者分组,分为缺陷较少(第一三分位数)到缺陷较多(第三三分位数)的组。

结果

基线 FI 评分与干预引起的体重减轻和增加体力活动无关。ILI 对 CVD 发生率的相对有效性与基线 FI 呈梯度相关(p=0.01),FI 处于第一三分位数的个体的相对益处(危险比=0.73[95%CI 0.55,0.98])与 FI 处于第三三分位数的个体无益处(危险比=1.15[0.94,1.42])。这种梯度关系在按年龄三分位数排序的个体中未观察到(p=0.52),并且在年龄 45-59 岁的参与者中更强(三因素交互作用 p=0.04)。

结论

在患有糖尿病的超重/肥胖成年人中,如果在个体积累了许多与年龄相关的健康缺陷之前给予多领域生活方式干预,那么干预可能最有效地降低 CVD 风险。然而,这些探索性分析需要其他研究的证实。

临床试验注册

NCT00017953。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验