Ford Joseph, Thomas Felicity, Byng Richard, McCabe Rose
University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Nov;30(13):2146-2159. doi: 10.1177/1049732320924625. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
We analyze the use of nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), an instrument that is widely used in diagnosing and determining the severity of depression. Using conversation analysis, we show how the doctor deploys the PHQ-9 in response to the patient's doubts about whether she is depressed. Rather than relaying the PHQ-9 verbatim, the doctor deviates from the wording so that the response options are selectively offered to upgrade the severity of the patient's symptoms. This works in favor of a positive diagnosis and is used to justify a treatment recommendation that the patient previously resisted. This contrasted with the rest of the data set, where diagnosis was either not delivered (as patients are presenting with ongoing problems) or delivered without using the PHQ-9. When clinician-administered, the PHQ-9 can be influenced by how response items are presented. This can lead to either downgrading or upgrading the severity of depression.
我们分析了九项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)的使用情况,该工具广泛用于诊断和确定抑郁症的严重程度。通过会话分析,我们展示了医生如何使用PHQ - 9来回应患者对自己是否患有抑郁症的疑虑。医生并非逐字照搬PHQ - 9,而是偏离了其措辞,以便有选择地提供回答选项,从而提高患者症状的严重程度。这有助于做出肯定的诊断,并被用于为患者之前拒绝的治疗建议提供依据。这与数据集中的其他部分形成对比,在其他部分中,要么未做出诊断(因为患者呈现的是持续存在的问题),要么在不使用PHQ - 9的情况下做出诊断。当由临床医生实施时,PHQ - 9可能会受到回答项目呈现方式的影响。这可能导致对抑郁症严重程度的低估或高估。