a Department of Sociology , University of California Los Angeles.
b School of Social and Community Medicine , University of Bristol.
Health Commun. 2018 Nov;33(11):1335-1344. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2017.1350913. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
From the earliest studies of doctor-patient interaction (Byrne & Long, 1976), it has been recognized that treatment recommendations may be expressed in more or less authoritative ways, based on their design and delivery. There are clear differences between I'm going to start you on X and We can give you X to try and Would you like me to give you X? Yet little is known about this variation, its contexts, or its consequences. In this paper, we develop a basic taxonomy of treatment recommendations in primary care as a first step toward a more comprehensive investigation. We take as our point of departure the observation that treatment recommendations such as those above represent not only different formulations but also different social actions. We distinguish five main treatment recommendation actions: pronouncements, suggestions, proposals, offers, and assertions. We ask: what are the main dimensions on which these recommendations vary and to what end? And what sorts of factors shape a clinician's use of one action type over another with respect to recommending a medication in the primary care context?
从最早的医患互动研究(Byrne & Long,1976)开始,就已经认识到,治疗建议的表达方式可能或多或少是权威的,这取决于它们的设计和传递方式。在我要给你开 X 和我们可以给你 X 试试和你想让我给你 X 吗之间有明显的区别。然而,对于这种变化、其背景或后果知之甚少。在本文中,我们开发了一个初级保健中治疗建议的基本分类法,作为更全面调查的第一步。我们以这样一个观察为出发点,即上述治疗建议不仅代表了不同的表述方式,也代表了不同的社会行为。我们区分了五种主要的治疗建议行为:宣告、建议、提议、提供和断言。我们要问的是:这些建议在哪些主要方面存在差异,其目的是什么?在初级保健环境中推荐药物时,哪些因素会影响临床医生选择使用一种行为类型而不是另一种行为类型?