Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e035414. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035414.
Practice arrangements in physician offices were characterised by examining the share of visits that involved physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). The hypothesis was that collaborative practice (ie, care delivered by a dyad of physician-PA and/or physician-NP) was increasing.
Temporal ecological study.
Non-federal physician offices.
Patient visits to a physician, PA or NP, spanning years 2007-2016.
A stratified random sample of visits to office-based physicians was pooled through the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey public use linkage file. Among 317 674 visits to physicians, PAs or NPs, solo and collaborative practices were described and compared over two timespans of 2007-2011 and 2012-2016. Weighted patient visits were aggregated in bivariate analyses to achieve nationally representative estimates. Survey statistics assessed patient demographic characteristics, reason for visit and visit specialty by provider type.
Within years 2007-2011 and 2012-2016, there were 4.4 billion and 4.1 billion physician office visits (POVs), respectively. Comparing the two timespans, the rate of POVs with a solo PA (0.43% vs 0.21%) or NP (0.31% vs 0.17%) decreased. Rate of POVs with a collaborative physician-PA increased non-significantly. Rate of POVs with a collaborative physician-NP (0.49% vs 0.97%, p<0.01) increased. Overall, collaborative practice, in particular physician-NP, has increased in recent years (p<0.01), while visits handled by a solo PA or NP decreased (p<0.01). In models adjusted for patient age and chronic conditions, the odds of collaborative practice in years 2012-2016 compared with years 2007-2011 was 35% higher (95% CI 1.01 to 1.79). Furthermore, in 2012-2016, NPs provided more independent primary care, and PAs provided more independent care in a non-primary care medical specialty. Preventive visits declined among all providers.
In non-federal physician offices, collaborative care with a physician-PA or physician-NP appears to be a growing part of office-based healthcare delivery.
通过考察涉及医师助理(PA)和执业护士(NP)的就诊比例,描述医师办公室的实践安排。假设合作实践(即由医师-PA 和/或医师-NP 组成的二人组提供的护理)正在增加。
时间生态研究。
非联邦医师办公室。
2007 年至 2016 年间就诊于医师、PA 或 NP 的患者。
通过国家门诊医疗保健调查公共使用链接文件对基于办公室的医师就诊进行分层随机抽样。在 317674 次就诊于医师、PA 或 NP 的患者中,描述了 2007-2011 年和 2012-2016 年两个时间段的单人实践和合作实践,并对其进行了比较。在双变量分析中,汇总加权患者就诊情况,以获得全国代表性估计值。调查统计数据评估了患者人口统计学特征、就诊原因和就诊科室。
在 2007-2011 年和 2012-2016 年期间,分别有 440 亿次和 410 亿次医师办公室就诊(POV)。比较两个时间段,单人 PA(0.43%比 0.21%)或 NP(0.31%比 0.17%)就诊率下降。单人医师-PA 联合就诊率略有增加。单人医师-NP 联合就诊率(0.49%比 0.97%,p<0.01)显著增加。总体而言,近年来合作实践,特别是医师-NP 合作实践有所增加(p<0.01),而单人 PA 或 NP 处理的就诊率则有所下降(p<0.01)。在调整患者年龄和慢性疾病的模型中,与 2007-2011 年相比,2012-2016 年合作实践的可能性高 35%(95%CI 1.01 至 1.79)。此外,在 2012-2016 年,NP 提供了更多独立的初级保健,而 PA 提供了更多非初级保健医学专业的独立护理。所有提供者的预防就诊都有所下降。
在非联邦医师办公室,与医师-PA 或医师-NP 的合作护理似乎是基于办公室的医疗服务提供的一个不断增长的部分。