Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 May 22;2020:7265487. doi: 10.1155/2020/7265487. eCollection 2020.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined as increased mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) above 25 mmHg, measured at rest by right heart catheterization. The exact global prevalence of PH is difficult to estimate, mainly due to the complex aetiology, and its spread may be underestimated. To date, numerous studies on the aetiology and pathophysiology of PH at molecular level were conducted. Simultaneously, some clinical studies have shown potential usefulness of well-known and widely recognized cardiovascular biomarkers, but their potential clinical usefulness in diagnosis and management of PH is poor due to their low specificity accompanied with numerous other cardiovascular comorbidities of PH subjects. On the other hand, a large body of basic research-based studies provides us with novel molecular pathomechanisms, biomarkers, and drug targets, according to the evidence-based medicine principles. Unfortunately, the simple implementation of these results to clinical practice is impossible due to a large heterogeneity of the PH pathophysiology, where the clinical symptoms constitute only a common denominator and a final result of numerous crosstalking metabolic pathways. Therefore, future studies, based mostly on translational medicine, are needed in order to both organize better the pathophysiological classification of various forms of PH and define precisely the optimal diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets in particular forms of PH. This review paper summarizes the current state of the art regarding the molecular background of PH with respect to its current classification. Novel therapeutic strategies and potential biomarkers are discussed with respect to their limitations in use in common clinical practice.
肺动脉高压(PH)定义为右心导管测量的静息状态下平均肺动脉压(mPAP)升高至 25mmHg 以上。PH 的全球确切患病率难以估计,主要是由于其病因复杂,其传播可能被低估。迄今为止,已有大量关于 PH 分子水平病因和病理生理学的研究。同时,一些临床研究表明,众所周知和广泛认可的心血管生物标志物具有潜在的用途,但由于其特异性低,同时伴有 PH 患者的许多其他心血管合并症,因此其在 PH 的诊断和管理中的潜在临床用途较差。另一方面,根据循证医学原则,大量基于基础研究的研究为我们提供了新的分子发病机制、生物标志物和药物靶点。不幸的是,由于 PH 病理生理学的异质性很大,这些结果在临床实践中的简单实施是不可能的,其中临床症状仅构成众多相互作用的代谢途径的共同基础和最终结果。因此,需要进行未来的研究,主要基于转化医学,以便更好地组织各种形式 PH 的病理生理学分类,并明确特定形式 PH 的最佳诊断标志物和治疗靶点。本文综述了 PH 的分子背景及其目前分类的最新研究进展。讨论了新的治疗策略和潜在的生物标志物,以及它们在常见临床实践中的使用局限性。