Suppr超能文献

呼气比例指数在肥胖患者中预测气道狭窄是否仍然具有预测价值?

Does the Expiratory Disproportion Index Remain Predictive of Airway Stenosis in Obese Patients?

机构信息

The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, U.S.A.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):606-609. doi: 10.1002/lary.28850. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The expiratory disproportion index (EDI) is the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by peak expiratory flow rate multiplied by 100. An elevated EDI (>50) can help differentiate upper airway stenosis from other dyspnea etiologies, but this has not been verified when considering body habitus. We hypothesize that the predictive value of elevated EDI in diagnosing airway stenosis will be lower in obese patients as compared to nonobese patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old with recorded pulmonary function test values, body mass index (BMI), and airway imaging were reviewed retrospectively from January 2011 to October 2018. EDI was recorded for four cohorts: nonobese and nonstenotic, obese and nonstenotic, nonobese and stenotic, and obese and stenotic, to determine the mean EDI and the sensitivity and specificity of an elevated EDI.

RESULTS

Mean EDI values were 66.53 ± 17.66 and 49.55 ± 2.04 in the nonobese stenotic and nonstenotic groups, respectively (P < .01). They were 58.00 ± 10.79 and 45.02 ± 1.42 in the obese stenotic and nonstenotic groups, respectively (P < .01). At a threshold of >50, EDI had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 56.2% in differentiating between stenotic and nonstenotic cases in the nonobese cohort and 50.0% and 71.9% in the obese cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

As previously established, mean EDI values were significantly different in stenotic and nonstenotic patients in both BMI cohorts. However, at the established threshold of >50, EDI was not as sensitive at identifying stenotic cases in obese patients as in nonobese patients. This suggests that the EDI remains useful in obese patients when elevated but should not be relied upon to rule out stenosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:606-609, 2021.

摘要

目的/假设:呼气不匹配指数(EDI)是第 1 秒用力呼气量除以最高呼气流量再乘以 100 的比值。EDI 升高(>50)有助于区分上气道狭窄与其他呼吸困难病因,但尚未在考虑身体形态时对此进行验证。我们假设,与非肥胖患者相比,肥胖患者中 EDI 升高对诊断气道狭窄的预测价值较低。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 10 月期间记录了肺功能检查值、体重指数(BMI)和气道影像学的>18 岁患者。记录了四个队列的 EDI:非肥胖且非狭窄、肥胖且非狭窄、非肥胖且狭窄和肥胖且狭窄,以确定平均 EDI 以及 EDI 升高的敏感性和特异性。

结果

非肥胖狭窄组和非狭窄组的平均 EDI 值分别为 66.53±17.66 和 49.55±2.04(P<.01)。肥胖狭窄组和非狭窄组的平均 EDI 值分别为 58.00±10.79 和 45.02±1.42(P<.01)。在>50 的阈值下,非肥胖组 EDI 对狭窄和非狭窄病例的鉴别具有 83.3%的敏感性和 56.2%的特异性,而肥胖组的敏感性和特异性分别为 50.0%和 71.9%。

结论

如前所述,在 BMI 两个队列的狭窄和非狭窄患者中,平均 EDI 值差异显著。然而,在>50 的既定阈值下,与非肥胖患者相比,EDI 识别肥胖患者狭窄病例的敏感性较低。这表明,在肥胖患者中,当 EDI 升高时,它仍然有用,但不应依赖它来排除狭窄。

证据水平

4 Laryngoscope, 131:606-609, 2021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验