• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症医疗保健系统的相对效率:使用数据包络分析进行的国际比较。

The relative efficiency of schizophrenia health care systems: an international comparison using data envelopment analysis.

机构信息

H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2020 Oct;23(10):1186-1192. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1786393. Epub 2020 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2020.1786393
PMID:32573296
Abstract

AIM

To compare the health economic efficiency of health care systems across nations, within the area of schizophrenia, using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach.

METHODS

The DEA was performed using countries as decision-making units, schizophrenia disease investment (cost of disease as a percentage of total health care expenditure) as the input, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per patient due to schizophrenia as the output. Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study, the World Bank Group, and a literature search of the PubMed database.

RESULTS

Data were obtained for 44 countries; of these, 34 had complete data and were included in the DEA. Disease investment (percentage of total health care expenditure) ranged from 1.11 in Switzerland to 6.73 in Thailand. DALYs per patient ranged from 0.621 in Lithuania to 0.651 in Malaysia. According to the DEA, countries with the most efficient schizophrenia health care were Lithuania, Norway, Switzerland and the US (all with efficiency score 1.000). The least efficient countries were Malaysia (0.955), China (0.959) and Thailand (0.965).

LIMITATIONS

DEA findings depend on the countries and variables that are included in the dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

In this international DEA, despite the difference in schizophrenia disease investment across countries, there was little difference in output as measured by DALYs per patient. Potentially, Lithuania, Norway, Switzerland and the US should be considered 'benchmark' countries by policy makers, thereby providing useful information to countries with less efficient systems.

摘要

目的

使用数据包络分析(DEA)方法,在精神分裂症领域内,比较各国医疗保健系统的健康经济效益。

方法

以国家为决策单元,将精神分裂症疾病投资(疾病成本占总医疗支出的百分比)作为投入,每个患者因精神分裂症导致的残疾调整生命年(DALY)作为产出,对各国进行 DEA 分析。数据来自 2017 年全球疾病负担研究、世界银行集团和 PubMed 数据库的文献检索。

结果

共获得 44 个国家的数据;其中 34 个国家的数据完整,纳入 DEA 分析。疾病投资(占总医疗支出的百分比)范围从瑞士的 1.11%到泰国的 6.73%。每个患者的 DALY 范围从立陶宛的 0.621 到马来西亚的 0.651。根据 DEA,精神分裂症医疗保健最有效的国家是立陶宛、挪威、瑞士和美国(效率得分均为 1.000)。效率最低的国家是马来西亚(0.955)、中国(0.959)和泰国(0.965)。

局限性

DEA 结果取决于数据集包含的国家和变量。

结论

在这项国际 DEA 中,尽管各国的精神分裂症疾病投资存在差异,但以每个患者的 DALY 衡量的产出差异很小。政策制定者可能会将立陶宛、挪威、瑞士和美国视为“基准”国家,为效率较低的系统的国家提供有用信息。

相似文献

1
The relative efficiency of schizophrenia health care systems: an international comparison using data envelopment analysis.精神分裂症医疗保健系统的相对效率:使用数据包络分析进行的国际比较。
J Med Econ. 2020 Oct;23(10):1186-1192. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1786393. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
2
Measuring the efficiency of health systems in Asia: a data envelopment analysis.亚洲卫生系统效率的衡量:数据包络分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 27;9(3):e022155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022155.
3
Efficiency evaluation of 28 health systems by MCDA and DEA.通过多准则决策分析(MCDA)和数据包络分析(DEA)对28个卫生系统进行效率评估。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00538-y.
4
Use of an operational model of community care to assess technical efficiency and benchmarking of small mental health areas in Spain.运用社区护理运作模型评估西班牙小型心理健康领域的技术效率及进行标杆管理。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Jun;10(2):87-100.
5
Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems.带有柔性措施的交叉效率评价及其在医疗保健系统中的应用。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Sep;22(3):512-533. doi: 10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Non-homogeneity in the efficiency evaluation of health systems.卫生系统效率评价中的非一致性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 10;23(1):1237. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10246-8.
7
Efficiency Determinants in Healthcare: A Systematic Review With an Integrated Canonical Correlation Analysis-Data Envelopment Analysis/Assurance Region Model.医疗保健中的效率决定因素:一项结合典型相关分析-数据包络分析/保证区域模型的系统评价
J Healthc Manag. 2023;68(5):356-375. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-22-00086.
8
Hospitals' efficiency in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗医院的效率:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:126. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_393_18. eCollection 2019.
9
Technical efficiency of peripheral health units in Pujehun district of Sierra Leone: a DEA application.塞拉利昂普杰洪区基层医疗卫生单位的技术效率:数据包络分析应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2005 Dec 14;5:77. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-5-77.
10
Measuring and Benchmarking Technical Efficiency of Public Hospitals in Tianjin, China: A Bootstrap-Data Envelopment Analysis Approach.中国天津公立医院技术效率的测度与标杆管理:一种基于Bootstrap的数据包络分析方法
Inquiry. 2015 Sep 21;52. doi: 10.1177/0046958015605487. Print 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Relative efficiency of psychiatric clinics in treating cases without coercion and achieving symptom reduction.精神科诊所在无强制手段治疗病例及实现症状减轻方面的相对效率。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;68(1):e76. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10034.
2
The efficiency of provincial government health care expenditure after China's new health care reform.中国新医改后省级政府医疗卫生支出效率
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258274. eCollection 2021.