• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录文本挖掘工具收集真实世界药物治疗结局:转移性肾细胞癌患者的验证研究。

An Electronic Health Record Text Mining Tool to Collect Real-World Drug Treatment Outcomes: A Validation Study in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):644-652. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1966. Epub 2020 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1002/cpt.1966
PMID:32575147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7484987/
Abstract

Real-world evidence can close the inferential gap between marketing authorization studies and clinical practice. However, the current standard for real-world data extraction from electronic health records (EHRs) for treatment evaluation is manual review (MR), which is time-consuming and laborious. Clinical Data Collector (CDC) is a novel natural language processing and text mining software tool for both structured and unstructured EHR data and only shows relevant EHR sections improving efficiency. We investigated CDC as a real-world data (RWD) collection method, through application of CDC queries for patient inclusion and information extraction on a cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving systemic drug treatment. Baseline patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and treatment outcomes were extracted and these were compared with MR for validation. One hundred patients receiving 175 treatments were included using CDC, which corresponded to 99% with MR. Calculated median overall survival was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.7-24.8) vs. 21.7 months (95% CI 18.6-24.8) and progression-free survival 8.9 months (95% CI 5.4-12.4) vs. 7.6 months (95% CI 5.7-9.4) for CDC vs. MR, respectively. Highest F1-score was found for cancer-related variables (88.1-100), followed by comorbidities (71.5-90.4) and adverse drug events (53.3-74.5), with most diverse scores on international metastatic RCC database criteria (51.4-100). Mean data collection time was 12 minutes (CDC) vs. 86 minutes (MR). In conclusion, CDC is a promising tool for retrieving RWD from EHRs because the correct patient population can be identified as well as relevant outcome data, such as overall survival and progression-free survival.

摘要

真实世界证据可以缩小药品上市许可研究与临床实践之间的推论差距。然而,目前用于从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取治疗评估用真实世界数据的标准是手动审查(MR),这种方法既耗时又费力。临床数据采集器(CDC)是一种新颖的自然语言处理和文本挖掘软件工具,可用于处理结构化和非结构化的 EHR 数据,仅显示相关的 EHR 部分,从而提高了效率。我们研究了 CDC 作为一种真实世界数据(RWD)采集方法,通过在接受系统药物治疗的转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)患者队列中应用 CDC 查询进行患者纳入和信息提取。提取了基线患者特征、疾病特征和治疗结局,并与 MR 进行了验证比较。使用 CDC 纳入了 100 名接受 175 种治疗的患者,与 MR 对应率为 99%。计算得出的中位总生存期为 21.7 个月(95%置信区间[CI]18.7-24.8)与 21.7 个月(95% CI 18.6-24.8),无进展生存期为 8.9 个月(95% CI 5.4-12.4)与 7.6 个月(95% CI 5.7-9.4),分别为 CDC 与 MR 比较的结果。癌症相关变量的最高 F1 得分为 88.1-100,其次是合并症(71.5-90.4)和药物不良事件(53.3-74.5),国际转移性 RCC 数据库标准的评分差异最大(51.4-100)。平均数据采集时间为 12 分钟(CDC)与 86 分钟(MR)。总之,CDC 是从 EHR 中检索 RWD 的有前途的工具,因为可以正确识别患者人群以及总生存期和无进展生存期等相关结局数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/1b71f0227b41/CPT-108-644-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/87260789556e/CPT-108-644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/428af4621a65/CPT-108-644-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/476a178445e0/CPT-108-644-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/ea4c9d6c5784/CPT-108-644-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/1b71f0227b41/CPT-108-644-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/87260789556e/CPT-108-644-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/428af4621a65/CPT-108-644-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/476a178445e0/CPT-108-644-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/ea4c9d6c5784/CPT-108-644-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf42/7484987/1b71f0227b41/CPT-108-644-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
An Electronic Health Record Text Mining Tool to Collect Real-World Drug Treatment Outcomes: A Validation Study in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.电子健康记录文本挖掘工具收集真实世界药物治疗结局:转移性肾细胞癌患者的验证研究。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Sep;108(3):644-652. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1966. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
2
Genomically annotated risk model for advanced renal-cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.基因组注释风险模型在晚期肾细胞癌中的应用:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1688-1698. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30648-X. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
3
Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the UK: insights from the RECCORD registry.英国肾细胞癌患者的治疗模式与临床结局:来自RECCORD注册研究的见解
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):159-65. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv504. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
4
Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World and Clinical Trials Data.舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌:真实世界和临床试验数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Target Oncol. 2019 Aug;14(4):405-416. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00653-5.
5
Real-World Evidence Data on Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Treatment in Austria: The RELACS Study.奥地利转移性肾细胞癌治疗的真实世界证据数据:RELACS 研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e957-e967. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
Comparative Survival Associated With Use of Targeted vs Nontargeted Therapy in Medicare Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.比较医保患者转移性肾细胞癌使用靶向治疗与非靶向治疗的生存情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195806. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5806.
7
An Italian, multicenter, real-world, retrospective study of first-line pazopanib in unselected metastatic renal-cell carcinoma patients: the 'Pamerit' study.一项意大利、多中心、真实世界、回顾性研究,评估一线帕唑帕尼治疗未经选择的转移性肾细胞癌患者:'Pamerit'研究。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):484-491. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa193.
8
Survival outcomes associated with different sunitinib dosing regimens in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌中不同舒尼替尼给药方案的生存结局
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):67-73. doi: 10.1177/1078155219837333. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
[Comparison of efficacy between sorafenib and sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and analyze prognostic factors for survival].索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效比较及生存预后因素分析
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018 May 23;40(5):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.05.012.
10
Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial.阿昔替尼对比索拉非尼作为晚期肾细胞癌的二线治疗:一项随机 3 期临床试验的总生存分析及更新结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):552-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70093-7. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenetic Implementation Studies-Lessons Learned From the PREPARE Study.药物遗传学实施研究——从PREPARE研究中汲取的经验教训。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Oct;118(4):803-812. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3749. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Automated derivation of diagnostic criteria for lung cancer using natural language processing on electronic health records: a pilot study.利用电子健康记录中的自然语言处理自动推导肺癌诊断标准:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02790-y.
3
Riboflavin transporter deficiency, the search for the undiagnosed: a retrospective data mining study.

本文引用的文献

1
Real world evidence in cardiovascular medicine: ensuring data validity in electronic health record-based studies.心血管医学中的真实世界证据:确保电子健康记录研究中的数据有效性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1189-1194. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz119.
2
An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate.基于缓解率这一代谢终点的美国食品和药物管理局批准的癌症药物概述。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jul 1;179(7):915-921. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0583.
3
The Revival of the Notes Field: Leveraging the Unstructured Content in Electronic Health Records.
核黄素转运蛋白缺陷症,探寻未确诊病例:一项回顾性数据挖掘研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Nov 1;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03428-y.
4
Development and Portability of a Text Mining Algorithm for Capturing Disease Progression in Electronic Health Records of Patients With Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.开发并实现一种用于从电子健康记录中捕获 IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者疾病进展情况的文本挖掘算法。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Oct;8:e2400053. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00053. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Women have a higher risk of hospital admission associated with hyponatremia than men while using diuretics.在使用利尿剂时,女性因低钠血症而住院的风险高于男性。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1409271. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1409271. eCollection 2024.
6
Use of proxy indicators for automated surveillance of severe acute respiratory infection, the Netherlands, 2017 to 2023: a proof-of-concept study.使用代理指标对严重急性呼吸道感染进行自动化监测,荷兰,2017 年至 2023 年:概念验证研究。
Euro Surveill. 2024 Jul;29(27). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.27.2300657.
7
An innovative method to strengthen evidence for potential drug safety signals using Electronic Health Records.利用电子健康记录加强潜在药物安全信号证据的创新方法。
J Med Syst. 2024 May 16;48(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10916-024-02070-2.
8
Reliability and Efficiency of the CAPRI-3 Metastatic Prostate Cancer Registry Driven by Artificial Intelligence.由人工智能驱动的CAPRI-3转移性前列腺癌登记系统的可靠性和效率
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;15(15):3808. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153808.
9
Outcomes and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent curable surgery: a protocol for a real-world, retrospective, population-based and nationwide Chinese National Lung Cancer Cohort (CNLCC) study.可治愈性手术治疗非小细胞肺癌患者的结局和预后:一项真实世界、回顾性、基于人群和全国性的中国国家肺癌队列研究(CNLCC)方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 28;13(6):e070188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070188.
10
A text-mining approach to study the real-world effectiveness and potentially fatal immune-related adverse events of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in older patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer.一种文本挖掘方法,用于研究 PD-1 和 PD-L1 抑制剂在 III/IV 期非小细胞肺癌老年患者中的真实世界疗效和潜在致命免疫相关不良事件。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Mar 14;23(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10701-z.
注释字段的复兴:利用电子健康记录中的非结构化内容
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Apr 17;6:66. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.
4
Real-World Data for Regulatory Decision Making: Challenges and Possible Solutions for Europe.用于监管决策的真实世界数据:欧洲面临的挑战与可能的解决方案
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):36-39. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1426. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Real-World Data and Clinical Pharmacology: A Regulatory Science Perspective.真实世界数据与临床药理学:监管科学视角
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):67-71. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1413. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Complexities, variations, and errors of numbering within clinical notes: the potential impact on information extraction and cohort-identification.临床记录中编号的复杂性、变化性和错误:对信息提取和队列识别的潜在影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 4;19(Suppl 3):75. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0784-1.
7
Innovation in oncology clinical trial design.肿瘤临床试验设计的创新。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 Mar;74:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
8
The use of real-world data in cancer drug development.真实世界数据在癌症药物研发中的应用。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Sep;101:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.036. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Mining Electronic Health Records to Extract Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Prostate Cancer Treatment.挖掘电子健康记录以提取前列腺癌治疗后的以患者为中心的结果。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:876-882. eCollection 2017.
10
Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review.临床信息提取应用:文献综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jan;77:34-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 21.