Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmuehlestrasse 14, 8050, Zurich, Switzerland.
AI Cure, New York, USA.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02728-4.
Though lifetime exposure to traumatic events is significant, only a minority of individuals develops symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Post-trauma alterations in neurocognitive and affective functioning are likely to reflect changes in underlying brain networks that are predictive of PTSD. These constructs are assumed to interact in a highly complex way. The aim of this exploratory study was to apply machine learning models to investigate the contribution of these interactions on PTSD symptom development and identify measures indicative of circuit related dysfunction.
N = 94 participants admitted to the emergency room of an inner-city hospital after trauma exposure completed a battery of neurocognitive and emotional tests 1 month after the incident. Different machine learning algorithms were applied to predict PTSD symptom severity and clusters after 3 months based.
Overall, model accuracy did not differ between PTSD clusters, though the importance of cognitive and emotional domains demonstrated both key differences and overlap. Alterations in higher-order executive functioning, speed of information processing, and processing of emotionally incongruent cues were the most important predictors.
Data-driven approaches are a powerful tool to investigate complex interactions and can enhance the mechanistic understanding of PTSD. The study identifies important relationships between cognitive processing and emotion recognition that may be valuable to predict and understand mechanisms of risk and resilience responses to trauma prospectively.
尽管一生中接触创伤性事件的程度很重要,但只有少数人会出现创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状。创伤后神经认知和情感功能的改变可能反映了潜在大脑网络的变化,这些变化可以预测 PTSD。这些结构被认为以一种高度复杂的方式相互作用。本探索性研究的目的是应用机器学习模型来研究这些相互作用对 PTSD 症状发展的贡献,并确定与回路功能障碍相关的指标。
94 名参与者在创伤后被收入市内医院的急诊室,1 个月后完成了一系列神经认知和情绪测试。应用不同的机器学习算法预测 3 个月后的 PTSD 症状严重程度和聚类。
总体而言,基于不同 PTSD 聚类的模型准确性没有差异,尽管认知和情绪领域的重要性显示出关键差异和重叠。高阶执行功能、信息处理速度和处理情绪不一致线索的改变是最重要的预测因素。
数据驱动方法是研究复杂相互作用的有力工具,可以增强对 PTSD 的机制理解。该研究确定了认知加工和情绪识别之间的重要关系,这些关系可能有助于前瞻性地预测和理解创伤后风险和恢复力反应的机制。