• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗对心血管和呼吸道疾病住院费用的影响:使用工具变量法在美国退伍军人人群中 5 个呼吸道季节的经济评估。

Comparing the impact of high-dose versus standard dose influenza vaccines on hospitalization cost for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases: Economic assessment in the US Veteran population during 5 respiratory seasons using an instrumental variable method.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Vaccine Epidemiology and Modelling, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2021 Mar 15;39 Suppl 1:A51-A55. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.080. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.080
PMID:32576459
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Cost savings associated with high-dose (HD) as compared to standard-dose (SD) influenza vaccination in the United States (US) Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) population have been attributed to better protection against hospitalization for cardiac and respiratory diseases. The relative contribution of each of these disease categories to the reported savings remains to be explored.

METHODS

During a recently completed study of HD versus SD vaccine effectiveness (conducted in the VHA over five respiratory seasons from 2010/11 through 2014/15), we collected cost data for all healthcare services provided at both VHA and Medicare-funded facilities. In that analysis, we compared the costs of vaccination and hospital care for patients admitted with either cardiovascular or respiratory disease. Treatment selection bias and other confounding factors were adjusted using an instrumental variable (IV) method. In this brief report we use the same study cohort and methods to stratify the results by patients admitted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those admitted for respiratory disease.

RESULTS

We analyzed 3.5 million SD and 0.16 million HD person-seasons. The IV-adjusted rVEs were 14% (7-20%) against hospitalizations for CVD and 15% (5-25%) against respiratory hospitalizations. Net cost savings per HD recipient were $138 ($66-$200) for CVD related hospitalizations and $62 ($10-$107) for respiratory disease related hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

In the US VHA population, the reduction in hospitalizations for CVD over five respiratory seasons contributed twice the cost savings (per HD recipient) of the reduction in hospitalizations for respiratory disease.

摘要

目的

与标准剂量(SD)流感疫苗相比,高剂量(HD)疫苗在美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)人群中节省成本,这归因于更好地预防心脏和呼吸道疾病住院治疗。这些疾病类别中每一种对报告的节省的相对贡献仍有待探讨。

方法

在最近一项关于 HD 与 SD 疫苗有效性的研究中(在 2010/11 年至 2014/15 年的五个呼吸道季节期间在 VHA 进行),我们收集了 VHA 和医疗保险资助设施提供的所有医疗保健服务的成本数据。在该分析中,我们比较了因心血管或呼吸道疾病入院的患者的疫苗接种和住院治疗费用。使用工具变量(IV)方法调整治疗选择偏差和其他混杂因素。在本简要报告中,我们使用相同的研究队列和方法,根据因心血管疾病(CVD)和因呼吸道疾病入院的患者对结果进行分层。

结果

我们分析了 350 万 SD 和 16 万 HD 人季。IV 调整后的相对疫苗效力(rVE)分别为 14%(7-20%)针对 CVD 住院治疗和 15%(5-25%)针对呼吸道住院治疗。每例 HD 接受者的净成本节省为 CVD 相关住院治疗的 138 美元(66-200 美元)和呼吸道疾病相关住院治疗的 62 美元(10-107 美元)。

结论

在美国 VHA 人群中,五个呼吸道季节中 CVD 住院治疗的减少贡献了(每例 HD 接受者)比呼吸道疾病住院治疗的减少贡献了两倍的成本节省。

相似文献

1
Comparing the impact of high-dose versus standard dose influenza vaccines on hospitalization cost for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases: Economic assessment in the US Veteran population during 5 respiratory seasons using an instrumental variable method.比较高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗对心血管和呼吸道疾病住院费用的影响:使用工具变量法在美国退伍军人人群中 5 个呼吸道季节的经济评估。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 15;39 Suppl 1:A51-A55. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.080. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Economic assessment of a high-dose versus a standard-dose influenza vaccine in the US Veteran population: Estimating the impact on hospitalization cost for cardio-respiratory disease.美国退伍军人中高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗的经济学评估:估计对心肺疾病住院费用的影响。
Vaccine. 2019 Jul 26;37(32):4499-4503. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.066. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
3
Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method.采用工具变量法分析高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗的相对效果。
Vaccine. 2019 Mar 7;37(11):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.063. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
4
Economic Assessment of High-Dose Versus Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine: An Evaluation of Hospitalization Costs Based on a Cohort Study.高剂量流感疫苗与佐剂流感疫苗的经济学评估:基于队列研究的住院费用评估
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 24;9(10):1065. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101065.
5
Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination in community-dwelling veterans.高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗接种在社区居住退伍军人中的比较效果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 15;61(2):171-6. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ261. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
6
Relative vaccine efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing probable influenza in a Medicare Fee-for-Service population.高剂量与标准剂量流感疫苗在医疗保险按服务收费人群中预防疑似流感的相对疫苗效力。
Vaccine. 2020 Jun 15;38(29):4548-4556. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Comparative effectiveness of high dose versus adjuvanted influenza vaccine: A retrospective cohort study.高剂量与佐剂流感疫苗的疗效比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):372-379. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.105. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
8
High-dose influenza vaccination and mortality among predominantly male, white, senior veterans, United States, 2012/13 to 2014/15.2012/13 年至 2014/15 年期间,美国以男性、白人、老年退伍军人为主要对象的高剂量流感疫苗接种与死亡率。
Euro Surveill. 2020 May;25(19). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.19.1900401.
9
A retrospective cohort study assessing relative effectiveness of adjuvanted versus high-dose trivalent influenza vaccines among older adults in the United States during the 2018-19 influenza season.一项回顾性队列研究评估了在美国 2018-19 流感季节中,老年人中使用佐剂疫苗与高剂量三价流感疫苗的相对效果。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2396-2407. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
10
High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine for Prevention of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Hospitalizations in Older Adults.高剂量四价流感疫苗预防老年人心血管和呼吸道疾病住院治疗的效果
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2024 Apr;18(4):e13270. doi: 10.1111/irv.13270.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaccination in Multiple Myeloma: Challenges and Strategies.多发性骨髓瘤的疫苗接种:挑战与策略
Eur J Haematol. 2025 Oct;115(4):334-343. doi: 10.1111/ejh.70013. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
2
The challenges and benefits of public health in smart cities from a 4 M perspective.从 4M 视角看智慧城市公共卫生的挑战和益处。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 3;12:1361205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1361205. eCollection 2024.
3
The Impact of Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine on Disease Severity in the US: A Stochastic Model.佐剂流感疫苗对美国疾病严重程度的影响:一个随机模型
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;11(10):1525. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101525.
4
High-dose influenza vaccine in older adults by age and seasonal characteristics: Systematic review and meta-analysis update.按年龄和季节特征分析老年人高剂量流感疫苗:系统评价与Meta分析更新
Vaccine X. 2023 Jun 5;14:100327. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100327. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
The feasibility of pragmatic influenza vaccine randomized controlled real-world trials in Denmark and England.在丹麦和英国开展实用型流感疫苗随机对照真实世界试验的可行性。
NPJ Vaccines. 2022 Feb 23;7(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41541-022-00444-6.
6
Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine compared with a standard-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in healthy people aged 60 years or older: a randomized Phase III trial.在 60 岁及以上健康人群中,与标准剂量四价流感疫苗相比,四价高剂量流感灭活疫苗的免疫原性和安全性:一项随机 III 期试验。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Dec 2;17(12):5475-5486. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1983387. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Influenza Vaccination for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Americas: Consensus document of the Inter-American Society of Cardiology and the Word Heart Federation.《美洲地区预防心血管疾病的流感疫苗接种:美洲心脏病学会与世界心脏联盟共识文件》。
Glob Heart. 2021 Aug 5;16(1):55. doi: 10.5334/gh.1069. eCollection 2021.