Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Vaccine Epidemiology and Modelling, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 15;39 Suppl 1:A51-A55. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.080. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
Cost savings associated with high-dose (HD) as compared to standard-dose (SD) influenza vaccination in the United States (US) Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) population have been attributed to better protection against hospitalization for cardiac and respiratory diseases. The relative contribution of each of these disease categories to the reported savings remains to be explored.
During a recently completed study of HD versus SD vaccine effectiveness (conducted in the VHA over five respiratory seasons from 2010/11 through 2014/15), we collected cost data for all healthcare services provided at both VHA and Medicare-funded facilities. In that analysis, we compared the costs of vaccination and hospital care for patients admitted with either cardiovascular or respiratory disease. Treatment selection bias and other confounding factors were adjusted using an instrumental variable (IV) method. In this brief report we use the same study cohort and methods to stratify the results by patients admitted for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those admitted for respiratory disease.
We analyzed 3.5 million SD and 0.16 million HD person-seasons. The IV-adjusted rVEs were 14% (7-20%) against hospitalizations for CVD and 15% (5-25%) against respiratory hospitalizations. Net cost savings per HD recipient were $138 ($66-$200) for CVD related hospitalizations and $62 ($10-$107) for respiratory disease related hospitalizations.
In the US VHA population, the reduction in hospitalizations for CVD over five respiratory seasons contributed twice the cost savings (per HD recipient) of the reduction in hospitalizations for respiratory disease.
与标准剂量(SD)流感疫苗相比,高剂量(HD)疫苗在美国退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)人群中节省成本,这归因于更好地预防心脏和呼吸道疾病住院治疗。这些疾病类别中每一种对报告的节省的相对贡献仍有待探讨。
在最近一项关于 HD 与 SD 疫苗有效性的研究中(在 2010/11 年至 2014/15 年的五个呼吸道季节期间在 VHA 进行),我们收集了 VHA 和医疗保险资助设施提供的所有医疗保健服务的成本数据。在该分析中,我们比较了因心血管或呼吸道疾病入院的患者的疫苗接种和住院治疗费用。使用工具变量(IV)方法调整治疗选择偏差和其他混杂因素。在本简要报告中,我们使用相同的研究队列和方法,根据因心血管疾病(CVD)和因呼吸道疾病入院的患者对结果进行分层。
我们分析了 350 万 SD 和 16 万 HD 人季。IV 调整后的相对疫苗效力(rVE)分别为 14%(7-20%)针对 CVD 住院治疗和 15%(5-25%)针对呼吸道住院治疗。每例 HD 接受者的净成本节省为 CVD 相关住院治疗的 138 美元(66-200 美元)和呼吸道疾病相关住院治疗的 62 美元(10-107 美元)。
在美国 VHA 人群中,五个呼吸道季节中 CVD 住院治疗的减少贡献了(每例 HD 接受者)比呼吸道疾病住院治疗的减少贡献了两倍的成本节省。