Suppr超能文献

重新定义第二产程:用力宫缩次数

Redefining Second Stage of Labor: Number of Pushing Contractions.

作者信息

Bok Serin M, Carmona Gabriela E Pena, Crawford Jake, Eskander Ramy, Desai Mina, Ross Michael G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California.

出版信息

AJP Rep. 2020 Apr;10(2):e183-e186. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709982. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Abstract

Despite time standards for second stage labor, "delayed pushing," uterine contraction frequency, and alternate contraction pushing may alter the effective maternal effort. We sought to quantify the number of pushing contractions needed for a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) among primipara and multipara patients.  Deliveries at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center in 2017 were selected for SVD of singleton, term newborns. The first 100 primipara and 100 multipara deliveries were analyzed and monitor tracings quantified for pushing contractions.  Significantly more pushing contractions were required by primiparas versus multiparas (17.3 ± 1.7 vs. 5.5 ± 0.7;  < 0.001) in accord with a longer second stage (86.7 ± 7.8 vs. 27.2 ± 4.9 min;  < 0.001) and epidural was associated with greater number of pushing contractions among both primipara (18.5 ± 1.8 vs. 10.8 ± 0.8) and multipara women (6.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 0.3). Newborn weight (<3000, 3000-3500, >3500 g) demonstrated a trend for increased pushing contractions among primipara (16.9, 16.5, 19.8 pushes, respectively) though not multiparas.  Although correlated with the absolute duration of the second stage, the number of pushing contractions eliminates ambiguities of "delayed pushing," pushing every-other, and frequency of contractions. Examination of larger databases and patients with second stage "arrest disorders" may provide pushing contraction criteria predictive of SVD and prevention of morbidity.

摘要

尽管有第二产程的时间标准,但“延迟用力”、子宫收缩频率和交替收缩用力可能会改变产妇的有效用力。我们试图量化初产妇和经产妇自然阴道分娩(SVD)所需的用力收缩次数。

选取2017年在哈伯-加州大学洛杉矶分校医学中心分娩的单胎足月新生儿进行SVD分析。对前100例初产妇和100例经产妇的分娩情况进行分析,并对监测记录的用力收缩情况进行量化。

与经产妇相比,初产妇需要显著更多的用力收缩(17.3±1.7次 vs. 5.5±0.7次;P<0.001),这与更长的第二产程一致(86.7±7.8分钟 vs. 27.2±4.9分钟;P<0.001),并且硬膜外麻醉与初产妇(18.5±1.8次 vs. 10.8±0.8次)和经产妇(6.1±0.8次 vs. 4.1±0.3次)中更多的用力收缩次数相关。新生儿体重(<3000g、3000 - 3500g、>3500g)显示初产妇中有用力收缩次数增加的趋势(分别为16.9次、16.5次、19.8次用力),但经产妇中没有。

尽管与第二产程的绝对持续时间相关,但用力收缩次数消除了“延迟用力”、每隔一次用力和收缩频率的模糊性。对更大数据库和有第二产程“停滞障碍”的患者进行检查,可能会提供预测SVD和预防发病的用力收缩标准。

相似文献

1
Redefining Second Stage of Labor: Number of Pushing Contractions.重新定义第二产程:用力宫缩次数
AJP Rep. 2020 Apr;10(2):e183-e186. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709982. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
3
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2.
6
Maternal heart rate patterns in the first and second stages of labor.产妇分娩第一和第二产程的心率变化模式。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 May;91(5):598-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01371.x. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
7
Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance.分娩时用力:靠的是发力技巧而非耐力。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1339-44. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.122402.

本文引用的文献

4
Association of the Duration of Active Pushing With Obstetric Outcomes.有效用力时间与产科结局的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;127(4):667-673. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001354.
6
OS030. Hypertension and labor duration: Does it take longer?
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2012 Jul;2(3):192. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor.产程延长对母婴结局的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):57-67. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000278.
8
Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.安全预防初次剖宫产。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
10
Maternal body mass index and duration of labor.产妇体重指数与产程时长。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Nov;171(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验