• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扁桃体周围脓肿切开引流致颈内动脉损伤风险。

Risk of internal carotid injury due to peritonsillar abscess drainage.

机构信息

University Of Health Sciences, Evliya Celebi Training and Research Hospital, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kütahya 43000, Turkey.

Mersin City Hospital, Department Radiology, Mersin, Turkey.

出版信息

Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Dec;47(6):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2020.06.001
PMID:32580906
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) is one of the most commonly seen ear nose and throat (ENT) emergencies. The most catastrophic complication that may occur due to surgical treatment of PTA is injury of internal carotid artery. The aim of this study is to determine distance and angle between PTA with ICA; and to prevent possible complications.

METHODS

A total of 34 adult patients with PTA were enrolled in this study. Neck computed tomographies of the patients with PTA were evaluated by a radiologist. The distance between PTA and ICA (DIP), and contralateral tonsil side and ICA (DIT) were measured and compared with each other. Also angle between PTA and ICA (AIP) was examined.

RESULTS

This study contained 20 (58.8%) males and 14 (41.2%) females with a mean age of 32.20 ± 12.75 years (range 18-60 years). Mean DIP and DIT scores were 13.39 ± 3.7 mm (min: 5.32, max: 19.07) and 9.61 ± 3.17 mm (min: 4.95, max: 16.35) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Mean distance between anterior border of PTA and ICA was 36.18 ± 6.42 mm (min: 17.12 max: 47.43). The AIP was 33.40 ± 2.29° (min: 30.10° and max: 40.71°). According to risk classification system, the 28 (82.4%) patients constituted low risk, and 6 (%17.6) patients constituted moderate risk.

CONCLUSION

According to the distance between the PTA and ICA, the risk of ICA injury was found to be mild and moderate in PTA patients. It is crucial for the surgeon to pay attention to the depth and angle of the incision during drainage of the abscess.

摘要

目的

扁桃体周脓肿(PTA)是耳鼻喉科(ENT)最常见的急症之一。由于 PTA 的手术治疗,可能发生的最灾难性的并发症是颈内动脉损伤。本研究的目的是确定 PTA 与颈内动脉(ICA)之间的距离和角度;并预防可能发生的并发症。

方法

共纳入 34 例 PTA 成年患者。由放射科医生对 PTA 患者的颈部计算机断层扫描进行评估。测量并比较 PTA 与 ICA(DIP)之间、对侧扁桃体侧与 ICA(DIT)之间的距离。还检查了 PTA 与 ICA 之间的角度(AIP)。

结果

本研究包含 20 名(58.8%)男性和 14 名(41.2%)女性,平均年龄为 32.20±12.75 岁(范围 18-60 岁)。平均 DIP 和 DIT 评分分别为 13.39±3.7mm(最小值:5.32,最大值:19.07)和 9.61±3.17mm(最小值:4.95,最大值:16.35),差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。PTA 前边界与 ICA 之间的平均距离为 36.18±6.42mm(最小值:17.12,最大值:47.43)。AIP 为 33.40±2.29°(最小值:30.10°,最大值:40.71°)。根据风险分类系统,28 例(82.4%)患者为低危,6 例(17.6%)患者为中危。

结论

根据 PTA 与 ICA 之间的距离,发现 PTA 患者的 ICA 损伤风险为轻度和中度。对于外科医生来说,在脓肿引流过程中,注意切口的深度和角度至关重要。

相似文献

1
Risk of internal carotid injury due to peritonsillar abscess drainage.扁桃体周围脓肿切开引流致颈内动脉损伤风险。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Dec;47(6):1027-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
2
Peritonsillar abscess: clinical aspects of microbiology, risk factors, and the association with parapharyngeal abscess.扁桃体周围脓肿:微生物学的临床方面、危险因素以及与咽旁脓肿的关联
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
3
[Evaluation of safe surgical treatment of peritonsillar abscess using computed tomography].[使用计算机断层扫描评估扁桃体周围脓肿的安全手术治疗]
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2002 Mar;105(3):249-56. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.105.249.
4
[Application of enhanced CT in the differential diagnosis of peritonsillar abscess and intratonsillar abscess].增强CT在扁桃体周脓肿与扁桃体内脓肿鉴别诊断中的应用
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;49(2):131-5.
5
Comparison of needle aspiration versus incision and drainage under local anaesthesia for the initial treatment of peritonsillar abscess.局麻下经皮穿刺抽脓与切开引流术治疗扁桃体周围脓肿的疗效比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Sep;276(9):2595-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05542-1. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
Cranial tonsillotomy for peritonsillar abscess: what a relief!扁桃体周围脓肿的颅骨扁桃体切除术:多么令人宽慰啊!
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;273(12):4507-4513. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4158-3. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
7
MRI evaluation of distance between tonsillary fossa and internal carotid artery in children.MRI 评估儿童扁桃体窝与颈内动脉之间的距离。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Oct;137:110209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110209. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
8
Predictors of intratonsillar versus peritonsillar abscess: A case-control series.扁桃体内脓肿与扁桃体周脓肿的预测因素:一项病例对照研究系列
Laryngoscope. 2019 Jun;129(6):1354-1359. doi: 10.1002/lary.27615. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
9
Peritonsillar abscess after tonsillectomy: a review of the literature.扁桃体切除术后扁桃体周围脓肿:文献综述
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Jul;93(5):353-5. doi: 10.1308/003588411X579793.
10
Needle aspiration versus incision and drainage for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess.针吸术与切开引流术治疗扁桃体周围脓肿的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 23;12(12):CD006287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006287.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Advantage of Using Video Laryngoscope in Puncture and Incisional Drainage of Peritonsillar Abscess: A Case Report.视频喉镜在扁桃体周围脓肿穿刺切开引流术中的应用优势:1例病例报告
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31;10(1):V22-V24. doi: 10.21980/J8G935. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Ubi pus, ibi evacua: a review of 601 peritonsillar abscess adult cases.有脓处,即排脓处:601 例成人扁桃体周脓肿病例回顾。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Aug;191(4):1849-1853. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02796-9. Epub 2021 Oct 6.