Suppr超能文献

利用 MBSAQIP 数据库比较男性和女性患者接受 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后的短期结局。

Comparison of short-term outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in male and female patients using the MBSAQIP database.

机构信息

Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Sep;16(9):1236-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.04.045. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Male sex has long been identified as a risk factor for adverse outcomes, including mortality, after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB based on biologic sex.

SETTING

Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing RYGB in the 2015, 2016, and 2017 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database were propensity matched 1:1 to compare 30-day outcomes between male and female sex.

RESULTS

A total 47,906 patients were included (23,953 men/23,953 women). The overall complication rate was higher in female patients (11.5% versus 10.2%; P < .001) with no difference in mortality related to RYGB at 30 days. No significant differences were seen between sexes for organ space surgical site infection or septic shock. Women had significantly more superficial surgical site infections (P = .002), urinary tract infections (P < .001), readmissions (P < .001), and reinterventions (P < .001). Men had significantly more episodes of unplanned intubation (P = .008), extended ventilator use (P = .01), progressive renal insufficiency (P = .01), acute renal failure (P = .008), cardiac arrest (P = .005), intensive care unit admission (P < .001), all-cause 30-day mortality (P = .038), and inpatient mortality rate (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex has been identified as a risk factor for adverse events and mortality after RYGB in several risk models. This study demonstrates an overall increased risk of both all-cause mortality and inpatient mortality. The study, however, did not demonstrate a difference in bariatric-related mortality. The prevalence of both major and minor complications was mixed between sexes, while women had a higher overall complication rate after RYGB. The abundance of data available within the MBSAQIP Participant Use Data File facilitates the creation of tools like risk models for bariatric surgery, such as the MBSAQIP Risk calculator.

摘要

背景

长期以来,男性性别一直被认为是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)后不良结局(包括死亡率)的一个危险因素。

目的

本研究旨在比较基于生物学性别的腹腔镜 RYGB 患者的短期结果。

地点

宾夕法尼亚州丹维尔的 Geisinger 医疗中心。

方法

在 2015 年、2016 年和 2017 年代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划(MBSAQIP)数据库中接受 RYGB 的患者,通过倾向匹配 1:1 比较男性和女性性别之间 30 天的结果。

结果

共有 47906 名患者入组(23953 名男性/23953 名女性)。女性患者的总体并发症发生率较高(11.5%比 10.2%;P<.001),30 天与 RYGB 相关的死亡率无差异。在器官空间手术部位感染或败血症性休克方面,男女之间没有显著差异。女性患者有显著更多的浅表手术部位感染(P=0.002)、尿路感染(P<.001)、再入院(P<.001)和再干预(P<.001)。男性患者出现计划外插管(P=0.008)、延长呼吸机使用(P=0.01)、进行性肾功能不全(P=0.01)、急性肾衰竭(P=0.008)、心脏骤停(P=0.005)、重症监护病房入院(P<.001)、全因 30 天死亡率(P=0.038)和住院死亡率(P<.001)的次数明显更多。

结论

在几个风险模型中,男性性别被确定为 RYGB 后不良事件和死亡率的危险因素。本研究表明,RYGB 后总体全因死亡率和住院死亡率均有升高的风险。然而,该研究并未显示与减重相关的死亡率存在差异。男女之间主要和次要并发症的发生率混合,而女性在 RYGB 后总体并发症发生率更高。MBSAQIP 参与者使用数据文件中提供的大量数据,便于创建减重手术风险模型等工具,例如 MBSAQIP 风险计算器。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验